Jump to content

Panthic Ekta And Non Amritdharis


SikhKosh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Patit means someone who took Amrit and later broke Rehat. Most of the moneh Sikhs are not in that category.

veer ji

to be a sikh one has always had to follow rehit , give bheta of your all to Guru ji, have amrit (charan or Khande di pahul) receive naam... only those who were in other faiths but then followed Guru ji were known as Sehajdhari. If one has not committed oneself to Guru ji how can one say I am a sikh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Money are not even sikhs to begin with. Khalsa is only Amritdhari

The above poster is not making the remark all Amritdharis have reached the state of Khalsa, but are on the path of the Khalsa, which makes them apart of the Khalsa Panth. People want to make the definition of Khalsa Panth and Sikh, among other terms ambiguous to allow the confusion to continue in the Panth of who a person is. The biggest crime in religion is to not let anyone know where they stand currently and what they need to achieve. Take the example of going through school for a full year without the teacher telling you which grade you are in. This would drive a person to rejecting the whole concept of school and the person will look to something else for achieving similar means. Achievement is measured by progress, which holds true in religion and secular education. A student who believes he is already in med school will not work to achieve marks to be accepted in med school. He doesn't need too and won't have the desire to achieve what he so called already has achieved. Similarly, in Sikhi the line of who is a Sikh has been made blurry by the secular-religious fanatics to take away progress and achievement from majority of the Sikhs. They are literally robbing you of Sikhi. The med student who believes to be in med school will only come to reality when he get's kicked out of the class for not being on the list. For the med school student the reality is quick and painless. He doesn't get a practicing licence and moves on. The same can't be said for the person who has been told to be a Sikh his whole life. Because of these secular-religious fanatics this person lost the game of life and will have to suffer again through hell and the reincarnation cycle of birth and death.

Simply look at Christianity. The followers are being misled everyday of their lives, so the secular-religious fanatical leaders of this religion can keep control over the mass population and make an easy profit. It is prevalent in Islam as well. Look closer to home and its in the religion of the Hindus. Sikhi is being misused in the same way by the secular-religious fanatics. Sikhi is not about titles, but progress and achievement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a very good explanation of relationship between Khalsa and Sikh is done by Paramjeet Singh Khalsa Anandpur sahib wale.

I will find it and post it. it is in the series of sukhmani sahib khatha.

After listening to this my view of Sikh and Khalsa and I can be totally wrong on this :blush2: :

Sikh is not a bounded religion but a community religion, believes in humanity and freedom.

"Jo mein kiya, So mein paya" |

"Dosh kya dije awar jana"|

If you do nitname, keep rehat, restrain yourself, keep kesh, accordingly you will reap great spiritual and material rewards.

Sikhism gives freedom, openness, well-being and acceptance of all the humanity despite of cast, religion and intelligence as one being.

Any person Hindu\Jew\Christian can read, learn and follow SGGS ji, do the seva will attain the param-pad.

In Sikh-History many great GurSikhs are not in the fold of khalsa, but are respected lot and even have yaadgari gurudwaras in their name.

Bhai Makan Shah Lubana, Bhai Moti Mehra, Bhai Todar Mal and many more.

Any Sikh that follow Guru's learning, do simran can become BrahmGyani. But Not Khalsa

To become khalsa one has to partake Amrit and follow a conduct that can be broken if you don't follow it:

Therefore Khalsa is a bounded religion with specific code of conduct for lifestyle.

Khalsa is a commitment not only from our side but from the Guru's side as well.

"Jab lag khalsa rahe niyara, Tab lag tej diyo mein sara"

Khalsa is an Army to protect the Divine light of Sikhism. Also the Management of Gurudwaras and other sikh religios matters are the responsibilty of khalsa to manage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a very good explanation of relationship between Khalsa and Sikh is done by Paramjeet Singh Khalsa Anandpur sahib wale.

I will find it and post it. it is in the series of sukhmani sahib khatha.

After listening to this my view of Sikh and Khalsa and I can be totally wrong on this :blush2: :

Sikh is not a bounded religion but a community religion, believes in humanity and freedom.

"Jo mein kiya, So mein paya" |

"Dosh kya dije awar jana"|

If you do nitname, keep rehat, restrain yourself, keep kesh, accordingly you will reap great spiritual and material rewards.

Sikhism gives freedom, openness, well-being and acceptance of all the humanity despite of cast, religion and intelligence as one being.

Any person Hindu\Jew\Christian can read, learn and follow SGGS ji, do the seva will attain the param-pad.

In Sikh-History many great GurSikhs are not in the fold of khalsa, but are respected lot and even have yaadgari gurudwaras in their name.

Bhai Makan Shah Lubana, Bhai Moti Mehra, Bhai Todar Mal and many more.

Any Sikh that follow Guru's learning, do simran can become BrahmGyani. But Not Khalsa

To become khalsa one has to partake Amrit and follow a conduct that can be broken if you don't follow it:

Therefore Khalsa is a bounded religion with specific code of conduct for lifestyle.

Khalsa is a commitment not only from our side but from the Guru's side as well.

"Jab lag khalsa rahe niyara, Tab lag tej diyo mein sara"

Khalsa is an Army to protect the Divine light of Sikhism. Also the Management of Gurudwaras and other sikh religios matters are the responsibilty of khalsa to manage.

Veer ji ,

OK the examples you gave were not Khalsa in 1699 sense , but they were all gursikhs followed rehit , read a nitnem of banis and so gave their all to Guru ji, and got charanamrit and naam ...that is why they got parampad ... without guru ji's acceptance we cannot progress

Khalsa rehit is the final code for Gursikhs, ALL Gursikhs should follow it since they have been given the title of Guru Panth in that state. Sikhs are Gursikhs otherwise whose Sikhs are they?

The Khalsa accepts Guru ji's Hukam and hukham is other religions do exist , we also accept Guru ji's jot is in every sentient being thus we accept that jot makes all one , it doesn't mean we agree with other religions or should follow any of their traditions just accept their existence.

Before Khalsa saajna, Guru ji always had covenant with his Gursikhs think Makhan Shah Lubhana and all the other sakhis where Gursikhs wishes and prayers for darshan were granted .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sarbloh granth sahib also explains as Guru khalsa at the physical and 3rd for of patshahi 10vi

if you say a collection of money to be in khalsa panth then you are mistaken ,


there is not if or but on this, khalsa panth are the only ones for meetings

4 muhe toh kya hua jivat kai hazar

also there is khalsa mahima , we are not talking about spirituality aspect here, ofcourse it has a play but only little
one has to be amritdhari for sarbat khalsa meeting ,

but if a panthic meeting is held then nirmale and other jathebandiyan are welcomed, but patit money are strict no no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use