Leaderboard

The list of traitors is too long to list but these are the names that come to mind when thinking of our gadhaars since the 80s -Gen Brar -Zail Singh -CM Beanta -KPS Gill -Badals And currently Capt Amerinder Singh is also fast approaching this list of traitors since he wants to appease his Hindu voters very much by offending Sikhs at every turn.

Sarbloh!! Maharaj describes Akaal Purakh as sarbloh in Dasam Granth. And a whole Granth by paathshah is called Sarbloh Granth. the batta to make Amrit is sarbloh. Maharaj could have chosen any other metal or even glass but chose sarbloh. All of maharaj and shaheed Singh shastars are sarbloh. Also maharajs kadda and baba deep Singh kada is sarbloh. To make food, eat and drink from sarbloh is rehat. Sarbloh is fundamental to sikhi as without it there’s no panth. No sarbloh batta/ Khanda = no Amrit = no Khalsa panth. Sarbloh ki rachha hamnai.

Thanks for that, bro. 5. Sunder Singh Majithia 4. Master Tara Singh, Akali Dal head 3. Sant Harchand Singh Longowal, Akali Dal head 2. Giani Jail Singh, President of India 1. Parkash Singh Badal, Chief Minister

i didnt get that straight away now i get it LOL! yh simran in punjab ? Simran as a female name is annoying lol think coz iv seen it in so many 90s cheesy hindi movies lol and the few "simrans" iv known were far from simran lol

Apart from Punjabi speaking areas that Punjab (doaba) lost to Himachal Pradesh, Punjab (malwa) lost a lot of historic as well as new Punjabi speaking areas to Haryana and Rajasthan. Historically the northern areas of Sirsa district was Punjab speaking areas which had been annexed by Patiala in the 1780s. Just a the Misls from Majha were taking over areas of Gujranwala and Sialkot, the Patiala state was taking over areas in southern Punjab. In Sirsa the Patiala Sikhs were in a constant struggle with the Bhatti Muslims. Some areas of Patiala state which we hilly areas like Morni were given to Himachal Pradesh in 1966 reorganisation of Punjab. The Malwai Sikhs did not have any Misls apart from the Phulkian states but these had historically been kingdoms before the kingdom of Maharaja Ranjit was established. The Majhail Sikhs had through the Misls conquered parts of Malwa and Haryana. The Phulkian states survived in the 20th century while the Majhail states in Malwa apart from Kalsia such as Kaithal, Ferozepur and Rupar were over annexed by the British. The territories of he Sikh states although they included heavily Hindi speaking areas which were given to them by the British in 1857, other areas which had mixed Punjabi and Hindi speaking areas such as Kaithal, Tohana, Jind were technically a part of Malwa until an old and ill defined historic area called Haryana was resurrected in 1966 and these area given to Haryana. Other areas such as Ganganagar district which was a part of Bikaner state had been settled by Sikhs in the 1920s when the Gang canal was built. This area although never a part of Malwa can still be considered an extension of Malwa as many of the farmers here were from Malwa.

It's interesting that the Uggardanti written before the Misls and then Maharaja Ranjit Singh set up Sikh rule in Punjab predicted that the victory of the Sikhs would lead to the destruction of both Islam and Hinduism in the areas where the Sikhs ruled. It is interesting to speculate what the Punjab would be like today had the Sikhs between 1770s to 1849 actively persecuted the Muslims, especially the intolerant Qazis and Mullahs. I mean for Muslims the fact that Muslim rule has been replaced by Sikh rule is enough of an 'oppression' then why did the Sikhs of that era not give the Muslims something to really complain about. It's quite surprising that Maharaja Ranjit Singh who has been presented as a secular ruler still know that allowing the Azan is a Muslim declaration of supremacy against other faiths and as such banned it in his kingdom. One of the chief reasons that the Qadianis urged Muslims to support British rule was that under their rule the Azan had again been allowed to be called from the minarets.

Yhh obviously not possible where I live but it doesn’t mean we can’t keep our own sodh. Just keep bibek to the upmost extent you can maharaj knows the rest enit

You obviously don't understand how debates work. It's not up to me to find something that you have used to defend your stance, it's up to you to find it and post it and with that we can look at the context of why Santji (if he did) built the Mandir. So if Gurmukhs are meant to be going around building the places of worship of non-Sikhs then surely in history you should able to provide thousands if not hundreds of examples, did Bhai Gurdas build non-Sikh places of worship, how about Baba Budha Ji, How about Baba Deep Singh etc. If should also come across countless Guru Ki Maseets and Guru Ka Mandirs in all the towns founded by the Gurus. The rest of your post is just a diversion technique. You want that Sikhs should not be criticising the SJW and leftists of KA but should instead be leaving them alone. Also since you seem to be an expert in bringing historic evidence to back up your points, then tell us how you justify KA's subversion of Langar by taking it to places where there is no Gurdwara or Guru Granth Sahib. Also Daswand was always used for Panthic causes, so why is KA asking for Sikhs to give them Daswand which they know that they give the vast majority 90% to non-Sikhs. Also can Daswand be used to provide a salary to someone like Ravi Singh who is not undertaking a Panthic service and the same goes for the amount of £200,000 a year that is used for all salaries and benefits that KA gives to its employees.

so put it on airplane mode at night? ok

I think that the Panth has reached a stage now where either we allow the SJW and leftist liberals to run amok and drain the Panth of all resources and empower other communities while the Panth descends into the void. It is now a case of survival and not just self interest. Look at Punjab it is fast becoming a lost cause. You only have to read the news from Punjab, 99 negatives occur against one positive. It has come to a stage where even the negatives are used by the SJWs to create more negatives. It is interesting how these SJW will make all sorts of judgements on Sikhs and accuse them to bring about their own ruin. If it's the farmers, the oft repeated lie that farmers borrow to show off while the truth is that farmers either borrow to be able to farm their land or sit at home and die of starvation. But on non-Sikhs it's never their fault and we should be helping them no matter if their situation was self inflicted.

Unfortunately when a great man is gone so many stories are made up about him even when these stories are used as justification to undo all the great work that he did in his life. What are the circumstance of Santji having built a Mandir? Did he allow that Mandir as is the norm to restrict lower castes from going to the Mandir? If you have so much knowledge that you can bring something obscure like this up then come up with the whole story. Do you actually not understand the idiocy of your statement there? So a Gurmukh should be building a mosque because there is no mosque in his village. So he builds a Mosque, a Sunni Mosque, what about if there is a Shia family in his village? Should he then build a Shia Mosque for them? How about Qadianis, who spread such falsehood about Guru Nanak that he was a Muslim? Should the Gurmukh also build them a Mosque, a Mosque where clear falsehoods about Guru Nanak would be taught. Where does your idiocy reach such a stage where there is no more idiocy you can partake in, will you then start to see some sense? Among the Sunnis there are Barelvi and Deobandis, so would you then have to build another Mosque for them? What about the Salafis/Wahabis who hate all non-Muslims, would ne duty bound as a Gurmukh to provide a <Edited> family their own Mosque in the village?