Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/30/2022 in all areas

  1. Sunni vs Shia is very different to muslim vs non muslim. With all of the Islamic terrorism these days there is no doubt that an undivided Punjab would be a bloodbath. We just needed a land where we were the overwhelming majority. It makes me laugh when apne think the break up of the greater East Punjab which included Haryana and parts of Himachal was a bad thing. It finally gave us a state where we were the majority, made Punjabi and Gurmukhi the official language. Even then we've messed that up and are now barely a majority. We aren't even a majority in the major cities of Punjab. Amritsar, Ludhiana, Jalandhar, Patiala all have more Hindus than Sikhs, I find that a joke! I would hate to live in a sul majority greater Punjab with curly writing everywhere. Demographics matter.
    5 points
  2. There is also a thread from last year about a Hindu fighting to get legislation passed to get ‘Jhatka meat’ labelled similar to Halal Meat in eateries in Punjab. I know this is controversial, but at least by doing this, individuals will get a choice of whether they wish to line the pockets of Muslim businesses, that effectively will end up funding their religious cause and agenda. I can see this being a positive step which would drive our peoples businesses and if applied to Milk this would open up opportunities for Punjabi Sikhs who wish to enter the dairy industry. A simple identifiable mark would enable them to this and rid Punjab of negative foreign invaders.
    4 points
  3. Well, there are a few things the "Rehitdharis" could learn from "monas": 1) be physically strong 2) breed. Of course, old Sikhs did both of these things. The current crop of weakling Sikhs who do nothing but listen to Kirtan don't. Because they're too "smart" for that.
    4 points
  4. So, I'm gonna take up footy again soon. Under Kachera can I wear compression shorts (help with the hamstrings) or wear over the keshera (whereby they'll be less effective). Views please.
    3 points
  5. I have always said the biggest battle will not be between us and non-Sikhs, it will be between us and the comrades and dhimmis like Ravi Singh who will always try and align with our enemies against the Panth. It is interesting that Khalsa Aid kept away from this village, either they knew that when the truth comes out about what had gone on there that they also would be attacked for being a part of the problem by helping Muslims and not our people. These Muslay attempted to defame the Sikh kisans by alleging that their boys had been harassing the Gujjar girls but now even they have had to admit that this wasn't true, even though this was what was alleged in the FIR. They have been shown to be liars. The Gujjars in one of the other videos said that they are from Jammu and they came to Punjab because here can get pathay for their animals. These people have been evicted from the forest department's land that they had been encroaching on and now they have started to come to Punjab. The Hindus of Jammu are getting rid of their gand and that gand is now settling in Punjab. While Jammu is decreasing it's Muslim population, Punjab is increasing its Muslim population. Left homeless after demolition drive, Gujjar Bakarwal community calls it selective targeting (milligazette.com) A few months ago the Jammu Hindus also started to harass the Rohingyas that had set up refugees camps there and even burned one of these camps. Now guess where these Rohingyas are going to come to? Fire In Jammu’s Rohingya Refugee Camp, 18 Encampments Reduced To Ashes (thecognate.com) It is not like these Gujjar bring anything positive to Punjab. They spit in the milk. Spread their gandgi everywhere, allow their buffalos to destroy the crops of the Kisans and present a danger to our majority in Punjab. The leftists and Ravi Singh bhaichara types have tried their best present this as a small matter of a village clash which happens almost everyday so that the issue could be swept under the carpet and we would go back to sleep. It looks like their efforts would have worked initially especially as the mainstream media accepted the Gujjars' lies and had presented the incidents as an attack by aggressive Jats against poor Gujjars but is good to see that many Panthic jathebandias have come to the aid of the kisans and the truth has come out. The awakening to this danger that is happening in Punjab is something that was sorely needed. Now we have videos like this with people are openly calling for the social boycott and ousting of the Gujjars from Punjab's villages. Such a strong and adamant view would never have been espoused before this incident.
    3 points
  6. Few Jathas of Singhs have been camping in the village and feeding the cows. They've openly challenged the Gujjars and said they will kick out Gujjars even if this issue gets settled. Luckily this incident woke up some in our nation. See the Muslims chickening and using taqiyaa to ease the tensions and safeguard their future in Punjab... And foolish Sikhs are falling for it (nearly 7k likes). Also shame on the commie farm leaders who 'regret' the killing of the 2 attacker Muslim Gujjars and are being cucks to these gujjars. 5:21... there you have the magical word coming from the 'Sikh' farmer unionist. Bhaichara.............
    3 points
  7. https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/birmingham-teachers-trauma-after-boyfriend-23498272 Birmingham teacher's trauma after boyfriend tears pen.is and punches head in row over pakoras Victim speaks out on abuse after suffering punches to his head and a laceration to his genitals in an assault at his Moseley flat By Stephanie Balloo 05:30, 30 MAR 2022 A Birmingham teacher whose pen.is was torn in an attack after a row over pakoras has spoken out to highlight the 'taboo of homosexual domestic abuse'. The victim was left with a painful laceration after his genitals were repeatedly yanked by his boyfriend, Luke Lal. The 32-year-old told how the 'throbbing' wound had to be glued at hospital following an assault at his former home in Alcester Road, Moseley. As an argument erupted over dinner plans, he also suffered three punches to his head.... "I came back from playing tennis, it was around 9pm, Luke and I had been texting about what to have for dinner. I told him that I was going to have veggie fingers as I was trying to cut down on junk food at the time," he recalled. "He suggested: 'Let's get pakoras'. When I returned home, he said he was going to the shop to collect food and when he came back he had bought pakoras. "I said that I didn't want to eat it. He started getting angry saying I'm not following what he wants to do, that I need to listen. "He punched me, then he pulled my pen.is five times. He did calm down and I said: 'I need to leave.'"
    3 points
  8. Punjab would be a very different place if Maharaja Ranjit Singh had the same strategy as the Spanish monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella had in Spain in 1492. They expelled the Muslims from Spain and only allowed those to stay who were prepared to convert to Catholicism. When some of these converts rebelled over the next century, the Spanish expelled them as well. Estimates of the number expelled are about 3 million out of a total population of 8 million, the majority of these were native Spanish speaking Muslims and not all were descendants of the Muslims invaders from north Africa. So nearly 40% of the population expelled and what was the result, the Spanish golden age in which Spain managed to build up an empire across the oceans and create 'New Spains' all over the world. Can you imagine what Spain would have been like if they had kept all the Muslims in their country? Just look at Bosnia and Kosovo.
    3 points
  9. You talking about Mohammedans, bro? ਮਹਾਦੀਨ ਤਬਿ ਪ੍ਰਭ ਉਪਰਾਜਾ ॥ ਅਰਬ ਦੇਸ ਕੋ ਕੀਨੋ ਰਾਜਾ ॥੨੬॥ ਤਿਨ ਭੀ ਏਕੁ ਪੰਥੁ ਉਪਰਾਜਾ ॥ ਲਿੰਗ ਬਿਨਾ ਕੀਨੇ ਸਭ ਰਾਜਾ ॥ Bachittar Natak ਅ. ੬ - ੨੭/੨ - ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ Then the Lord created Mahadeen (Mohammed). He made him King of Arabia. He also created a Panth. He made them all kings without peni ses.
    3 points
  10. Never heard it before and it caught my attention on a radio station, I'm guessing its from Dasam Granth
    2 points
  11. I’ve seen Pal Kharod and his organisation on YouTube exposing this disgusting behaviour. There is simple solution to ridding Punjab from this Kanjar tribe without resorting to violent agitation against them. The Gujjars are in Punjab because they earn their living from selling Milk to Punjabi Sikh and Hindus. Stop buying Milk from the Gujjars and they will no longer reside in Punjab. They are nomadic people and will move on to the next sucker who buys their product. The same goes for Bihari Bhaye, they moved back to Bihar during Covid lockdown when manual labour was restricted. Completely boycott their services and watch them run from Punjab.
    2 points
  12. Watch this videos. There is a Singh called Pal Kharod who has been active with a small jathebandi of Singhs who raid Gujjar Deras and recue mentally challenged people who they have abducted and forced to work for them and kept them in slavish conditions. These Gujjars have also been accused of striking people normal people on the head so that they suffer brain injuries and they can then be kept as slaves to do manual labour for them. He also raids Gaushalas as well where there are people also kept like the Gujjars keep.
    2 points
  13. Some immediate steps our villages can take: 1. Stop purchasing gujjar milk 2. Pass village (panchayat) resolutions to prevent anyone from leasing/selling land to gujjars in the future 3. Terminate current leases with gujjars 4. Offer to purchase back lands sold to gujjars 5. Push to get police raids done on their deras to rescue mentally challenged and trafficed people and FIRs on the culprits 6. Stop selling fodder to the ones who don't have land Some long term plans: 1. Advocate to have land purchase laws similar to Himachal Pardesh to prevent non-punjabis from purchasing land in Punjab 2. Ban the gujjars from wild grazing. This is a huge problem as they take hundreds of their cattle and use public land to graze them on the roadsides. This also ends up damaging huge amounts of adjoining farmland crops. This public grazing also casues many many accidents and anyone that objects to them gets attacked by their whole kabeela.
    2 points
  14. muslims got pakistan and it just became a failed state. Just look how many attacks happen there. Its good we got separated. Alot of people who talk about undivided Punjab dont know what it is like to live in muslim majority areas.
    2 points
  15. So the BBC, CNN, Western politicians, western elites, western celebs, western media are telling you the truth suddenly. By all means wave you virtue signalling Ukraine flags as support this lot Ah but Zelensky and his oligarchs are good folks, who aren't scamming the ukrainian people. https://www.axios.com/pandora-papers-politicians-countries-d8ca46fc-8422-4d39-b354-aa1de2a24a9f.html Oh there definitely weren't any USA funded bio labs in Ukraine, right on Russia's border in contravention of many treaties. But yes, the usual suspects are now telling you the truth, just as they did over the last 2 yrs over Rona.
    2 points
  16. Maybe people should not wear kesh if they aren't willing to fight?
    2 points
  17. Are there any limits to this magnanimous policy of yours? Mia Khalifa tweets "Khalistan Zindabad" will have you recommending her for a siropa from the Akal Takhat? Lana Rhoades wears a dastaar and the clothes of a Gursikhni for an Instagram post on Baisakhi, and you'd be championing her bringing attention to Sikhi saroop?
    2 points
  18. Today we would be around 10% of the population of that Empire, I highly doubt we would still be in charge to this day if we didn't lose to the British. Also a lot of modern day East Punjab wasn't even in Ranjit Singh's empire for example Ludhiana, Patiala. At the end of the day we had an empire that lasted a mere 50 years. The suls ruled over a lot of India for several hundred years, the British were in India for 250 years and in Punjab for 100 years, so even the Brits ruled Punjab for double the time we did. It's sad but true.
    2 points
  19. Yeah, but then if we had to leave Pakistan 100%, what about Nankana Sahib? The real solution, that I see, would have been to not let the British win in the first place. Then we have all the major Gurdawaras, and make treaties with Patna Sahib and Hazur Sahib areas. (The Maharaja was friendly with the Nizam of Hyderabad.)
    2 points
  20. Yeah, you're right about the culture. But what hurts is it was built on Punjabi villages, and then populated by outsiders. That's why I want to give it back to the original villagers. (India wants reparations from UK doesn't it? Fair play.)
    2 points
  21. Well, it would be best if it were just Punjabi Hindus who were members of RSS. Then we wouldn't need to "drive them out". After they accomplish their task, they'll just go back to their normal boring shopkeeper lives.
    2 points
  22. I'm just trying to understand what happened. This was a sudden attack by someone who burst into a room unexpectedly.
    2 points
  23. because they did not go to the family's aid immediately or even locate the cowering and frightened wife and child in the hotel grounds when they couldn't find her in the room , despite her calls from there. Initial noises which woke them was around 2 am and Amritpal was killed around three am, what do you reckon five star hotel standard of care????
    2 points
  24. As long as we're playing alternative history, forget 1947. We should never have lost our kingdom, then we wouldn't have to begging from anybody. Also, why didn't Sardar Baghel Singh simply take over the weakened Mughal Empire instead of just building a few Gurdwaras when he had hoisted the Nishan Sahib over the Red Fort in Delhi?
    1 point
  25. What I am pointing out is that our community would have been in a much better position had the complete migration of Muslims been enforced. You are replaying what happened after 1947 without understanding what effect having no Muslims have on the politics of India after 1947. My personal feeling is that it would have been more regional focussed than religion focussed. There would have been no Hindutva, because it thrives on the fact that a large number of Hindus believe that Muslims are a pampered minority which harbours malice to them. Would the Hindus have been able to paint the Sikhs as such in the absence of Muslims, possibly but it would have been much more difficult because you can't paint a people as being your own one minute and then claim they present a existential threat to you the next minute. You can see this being playing out by Hindutva keyboard warriors online and they are getting nowhere.
    1 point
  26. 1 point
  27. islamists just hate to your face...they are not cunning/smart like hindus who are backstabbers and fake 'dhramic brotherhood to you face' and stab you in the back ...islamists say it to your face 'kill the kaffirs'...you can deal with them face to face...hindus are snakes and cunning
    1 point
  28. With respect to politics and why panthic politicians never get elected, people overlook the divisions with the Sikh community. First of all, less than 60% of the population of Punjab is Sikh. That alone makes it extremely difficult to elect any politician who will be portrayed as putting Sikh issues first. Then you have to understand that most of the "Sikh" politicians prioritize issues that matter to jatts. And even if one argues that they don't prioritize those issues that much, non-jatt Sikhs have the perception that "panthic" politicians put jatt issues first. I blame jatts for their tribalism and for being jerks to Sikhs from other groups.
    1 point
  29. I see where you are coming from. But what I witnessed when I went to India (pathological dishonesty, materialism, corruption, casteism, etc.) makes it difficult for me to sympathize much with them. These people were handed a religion to free them from so much of what plagues them, and they squandered that good fortune. How can it make any sense that the "Sikh" community has huge problems with alcohol, drug use, female infanticide, huge spending on lavish weddings that leave families financially crippled, and caste-based discrimination? It is disgraceful.
    1 point
  30. I dont see any unity with hindus. They took our land away in Gujarat why do you think they couldnt have done the same in case the above scenario happened? Water would still be diverted. Hindi would still be imposed. History would still be distorted. I think you are under estimating what would have happened in this scenario. We would be prime target of Hindus. If they could easily take our land and kick us out of gujurat without any uproar they would do many worse things given we are the prime target. I personally dont believe the above scenario would be better. The things that led to 1984 was because they want to finish us off not some excuses that congress incited it or so and so did it. They use the terrorist bhindranwala excuse to hide their hatred for sikhs. They want to finish us off. These other excuses are just a cover up.
    1 point
  31. I am kind of offended that you suggested that I only have issues with Sikh women. I dislike all monay, men or women (and some non-monay).
    1 point
  32. I don't agree. Let's just say that all the Muslims from northern India had been evicted then the results would have been-; 1. The amount of Muslim owned land left in India would have been greater than the land left behind by Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan. Muslim land in UP and Rajasthan could have been given to Sikhs and Hindus and there would have been no need for Sikhs and Hindus to be allotted less land that the amount they left behind in Pakistan. So, there would have been no crisis in agriculture with landholdings being divided and becoming uneconomic or at least this would have been delayed by a few decades as the land with each farming family would have been more than what it was in reality. 2. Kashmir could have been cleared of Muslims just as Jammu was. The Sikhs and Hindus of the areas around Rawalpindi/Kahuta/Murree who have many cultural similarities with Kashmiri Pandits and Sikhs could have been settled in the Kashmir valley to replace the Muslims kicked out of there. 3. The extra 25-30 Million Muslims which Pakistan would have had to resettle and rehabilitate in 1947 would have caused them to have an economic crisis which would have caused their economy to stagnate and they would not have reached the economic level that they have now and would have been far behind India. Also because of their having such a large population from the start they would have had to out of necessity institute some kind of population control measures otherwise the Pakistan of today instead of having a population of 220 million would have a population of 375 million which the country can never support. 4. The power we had in united Punjab and in British India was due to our having been the largest landholders in Punjab. This would have been transferred to an India devoid of most Muslims. Having such landholdings would have ensured that we kept our population increasing at a good level as well. Also our diaspora and migration would have been much lower as there would have been no need for Sikhs to migrate abroad if their landholdings were sufficient to feed many generations of their families. The only migration would perhaps have been more from urban or professional Sikhs.
    1 point
  33. If its such a good idea having the muslims in India why did we eliminate them from Punjab? They are now coming to Punjab in large numbers, mosques are opening everywhere. Open your eyes.
    1 point
  34. The Hindus really messed up big time in 1947. That was their time to remove all Muslims from India (like we did in Punjab) and claim their Ram temple in Ayodhya but they and their leaders bottled it big time. It is because of their failings that muslims from UP and Bihar have come to Punjab.
    1 point
  35. Great. I hope the Badal "Akali" Dal does do so to cement its decline. Meanwhile the "real" Akali Dal, Akali Dal Amritsar, created in Amritsar in 1994 or so at the behest of the Akal Takhat Jathedar can come to the fore as the representative of Sikhs. In addition, please remember that the electorate of Punjab is barely majority Sikh. This was not Sikhs voting among themselves.
    1 point
  36. Bro, I agree it would be great to have an observant Sikh leader of our political unit. But our political unit is not Sarkar-e-Khalsa (the Sikh Raj). It is a province in the Hindu dominated "Republic of India". For a while we had incompetent, sell-out keshadhari "Sikhs" as CMs because that's all the system would allow. Any non-sellout would be dismissed and President's Rule imposed. In addition, there wasn't a choice between a reform candidate with cut beard and a reform candidate with a 2 ft beard and kirpan. The others were just the same rishvatkhor (bribe-takers) that we've seen over the past 50 years. I completely agree that not cutting hair needs to be encouraged among Sikhs, but what is your plan to do so?
    1 point
  37. Don't worry confused bootha, I got you. Trying to think how to make this simpler... the pamphlet DARPA handed out to researchers who might want to join the LifeLog program did point to LifeLog's potential as a surveillance tool. "LifeLog will be able … to infer the user’s routines, habits and relationships with other people, organizations, places, and objects," the pamphlet explained, "and to exploit these patterns to ease its task." https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vice.com/amp/en/article/vbqdb8/15-years-ago-the-military-tried-to-record-whole-human-lives-it-ended-badly
    1 point
  38. Except it wasn't. LifeLog was a project of the Information Processing Techniques Office of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). Nobody would go for it, it was too shady, so they released facebook instead and had people download it themselves.
    1 point
  39. The women seems to be a retard. She had a teenager daughter - and she was considering suicide because of this........ And certain women (usually ones who consider themselves to be attractive) need to use some brains and realise 'attention whoring' on social media isn't a good look for brown women.
    1 point
  40. I have also seen Sikh men marrying non sikhs who are interested in sikhi but not converts and then having kids teaching them sikhi but as soon as the child grows up they just are not attached to sikhi and are confused about their identity. For some reason sikhs are unable to hold onto sikhi. Maybe it's TRUE all the good sikhs became shaheed, now we are only left with not so good leftovers who probably converted for gains or other reason. Need new converts who are very strong in their conviction. I think somebody here posted an article about a french sikh convert who moved to punjab I dont remember where I read it but how many sikhs wilp move back to punjab for sikhi? Negligible. We have become a very materialistic people for some reason. Maybe our ancestors converted to sikhi for gains and now we are just following their footsteps.
    1 point
  41. 90% of sikhs too dumb to understand this. Which is why we need to have converts who are very strong in their conviction and don't believe in this liberalistic nonsense. Other wise what's the point of having converts too if they just marry non sikhs? I was reading this post from a convert having a non sikh partner and asking about relationship advice as to whether he should marry her or not. What's the point of becoming Sikh when you won't even pass it on? Sikhs of the past got their skulls scalped but did not leave sikhi and these present day so called sikhs will throw sikhi away in a heartbeat when someone from another group shows them some attention. They suffer from inferiority complex. Even Sikh men are useless at this point in spreading Sikhi through intermarriage.
    1 point
  42. It was when they started to close-off parts of the internet using platform-specific eco-systems (Apple, Android, etc) is when this kicked into second gear. It "focused" the attention of the masses into very specific avenues that were designed for certain purposes depending on the app in question. The launch of the iPhone was definitely a watershed moment, because that's when an affordable personal smartphone became a must-have accessory. Soon afterwards you see the launch of Twitter, which is where any retard with a half-baked thought could share it with the world and be lead to believe that there were millions of like-minded id1ots out there. Another key phase was the dating apps; the promotion of degeneracy. It's amazing that they took things that were already in practice in the "analog" world, and created their "digital" counterparts for the tech age. Objectively, it's beautifully evil.
    1 point
  43. Like social media wasn't invented to exactly achieve what's happened. C'mon man, nothing is accidental on this scale.
    1 point
  44. One person can not follow two or more religions at the same time. By following religion I mean that you do your nitnem everyday. and try to follow the panthic rehat maryada. If you really know all these religions than you know for a fact that you can't follow all of them at the same time. You can't have one foot in one boat and other foot in another boat. An amritdhari cant be worshiping idol like in Hinduism and Christianity. That is what he meant by hodge podge. the kids are usually confused and can't really commit to one religion. it does happen but its every rare when both parents accept one religion. I have seen it happen but rare.
    1 point
  45. I dont know man. Mixed race kids face many issues. From identity issues to language barriers to having a hodge podge religion. And the kids will be part of globalixation and culture will erode over time. White and black ppl have undergone this in america and it has terrible consequences. Only if 1 culture/religion/language is allowed to be dominant will it work.
    1 point
  46. Someone got too much time on their hands
    1 point
  47. It's very complicated. You run the risk of cucking yourself if you try to come across as a mahapurash, even moreso if the girl is nowhere near that level. It would work in Satjug, but currently you'd end up putting yourself at a huge disadvantage in many subtle ways. There's not much more I can say without getting graphic and detailed, and I don't want to go down that route with the low iq brainlets on this forum. ??
    1 point
  48. Vague and unhelpful. Life isn't a movie where things magically work themselves out just because someone wishes it were so. Anything he says in an attempt to curb her habits and behaviours at this early juncture will be misconstrued as so-called controlling behaviour. She's well within her rights to ask, "Who are you to me?" Why bother with that hassle when it's certain someone of that mindset and mentality is incapable of modifying their behaviour? Those habits are now set in stone. They'll never change. Any guy with a mind that functions even slightly beyond the superficial will understand this. Find someone whose inner state of being matches their external saroop. It's not the Singh's job to coach her, guide her, etc. These girls delight in telling the world how incredibly in control and awake they are. So be it.
    1 point
  49. Too much social media use is a bad sign.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use