Jump to content

alias

Members
  • Content Count

    793
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by alias

  1. i think this is in the janam sakhis about dasam paatshah if im not mistaken.
  2. anyone have sudharam marag granth??? as pdf? looking for it...
  3. and r there any other pothis? (pran sangli) I have come across 4 in my reading. 1. goindwal pothi - i only have this one 2. guru harsahai pothi 3. ahiyarpur pothi 4. pothi harjas are these the 4 pothis that mcauliffe wrote about, or did he write about 5? if not, what are they and where can i find these pothis published in their complete form? ive come accross damdama sahib pothi, kartarpur pothi, patna pothi, and amritsar pothi. Ive have assumed that these are the full aad granth. am i right? I have also come across "MS 1245" manuscript 1245, amongst many other manuscripts. does an
  4. and the guru har sahai pothi, and the Ahiyapur Vali Pothi, and the harjas pothi where can i get these plzzzz thanks
  5. yes i know it does, but i cannot find it in the sau sakhi. i have the pdf version. i dont see y the pdf should be different. i want the punjabi version, and i cannot find it in this pdf of sau sakhi. b 38037869-Sri-Gur-Ratan-Mal-Sau-Sakhi-Punjabi.pdf
  6. y doesnt anyone reply to this? i cannot find the raj nama in the sau sakhi. everyone quotes sau sakhi as the source. its not in there. if its in the janam sakhi, which JS? and what about the other writings?
  7. where can i get raj nama, kakaar vichar and bihangam ban from? theres also a bani assiciated with p:10 called bani bihangam. i have this. is this the same as bihangam ban (whihc is associated to gru nanak dev ji)?
  8. I need help in finding the apocryphal bani called - raj nama - kakar vichar - bihangam ban ive looked in the cummingham book on 340, its in english (below) anyone have a punjabi source or is it just in the janam sakhis? which janam sakhi? i have naseehat nama and karni nama, hazarnama etc... i am stuck on where to find these three. thanks APPENDIX XX THE ADMONITORY LETTERS OF NANAK TO THE FABULOUS MONARCH KARUN; AND THE PRESCRIPTIVE LETTERS OF GOBIND FOR THE GUIDANCE OF THE SIKHS. Note.—Two letters to Karun are attributed to Nanak. The first is styled the 'Na
  9. ok, so where could i find them? bala JS? or which JS? im looking for specifically the raj nama
  10. yes but is it in the sau sakhi as everyone claims! ive sent a link on page 1 of this thread, is it the same sau sakhi?? if so, y is there no karni nama and raj nama in there??? thanks. i am basically lookig for the bani of karni nama (besides the one in beant bania da sundar gutka_, and THE RAJ NAMA (NON ENGLISH). if anyone can help, please do. i cannot find it online.
  11. HI, so ive found a pdf of sau sakhi, but no raj nama or karni nama in there! is it just that i cant see it and its actually in there, or is it not?? http://www.globalsikhstudies.net/pdf/sau%20sakhi.pdf
  12. their basis for questioning dasam bani is always flawed. letters etc have stated and listed guru G's bani from bhai mani singh to mata G. so if you think dasam granth can be questioned, please think again. and again. and yes, guru g wrote bani, lots of it. and which bani are you talkin about when you say "open you doors.." ? dasam bani?
  13. well, i've found the bani and it mentions guru nanak dev ji's travels to srilanka and raja shiv nabh in a dohra. it also mentions paintees akhri. it also mentions daya singh as well a few times. i have not found where this bani is from tho. re bhramanik mentality, in the "pooranmashi katha", it mentions q few times to keep varat on puranmashi. this is a blatant anti gurmat statement made again and again. people may say, bhookhe bhagat na keejai, but, we can understand the varat to mean, the daan to god i.e. meditate. Sarbloh granth says "jathasakat daan >bhookai< kahu; padpankaj mehe
  14. alias

    Naam Dhirr

    Sure it is josh. I agree with that. But what should be josh, soon turns into hype over anything. Thats not the meaning of naam. The confusion comes from people who dont know what they're doing going on about getting drirta and feeling josh. I'd say to them, ever heard of trying to anhad vuj your feelings and cone to unison with urself?.. to me, thats the true drirta. And apologies! !!! Hajoori of **GURU GRANTH SAhIB**!!!.. was a typo saying hajoori of punj.
  15. alias

    Naam Dhirr

    "naam drir" is commercialized now! naam can only be given by your guru or wherever guru is prakash! which is why amrit sunchaar is always done in the hajoori of punj piyaare. naam drir comes after viraag stage. a true traveller, has naam "drirta"! if someone shouts at you, your heart shudders! that aint no drir matie! same goes with " naam drir" wrt akjs. i myself go to plenty of rensabais and have no qualms with any way anyone wishes to "jup naam". the rolling of the tongue is commercialized! what about feet. heartbeat. hair. its not all about the "drirrrr". naam is god himself and not
  16. Does anyone have these in its full works? G S Mann does have all of them, however, does if come as a pothi? Can anybody please help me with the full text of the goindwal pothi banis? (complete with gulam sadasevak etc) thanks to anyone who can help me. gurfateh!
  17. thanks for that, i will defo look into it. i take it you dont know the other shabad that singh ji refferd to in the book? i personally, only thought that it was the rahao and first two pauris that singh ji was talking about. in case i an mistaken, i post and ask if there is another shabad by bhagat soor das ji that was taken out of SGGS. i know there are 2 granths attributed to bhagat soor das; sur sagar granth (supposed to be >100,000 bhajans but now i think < 8000), sur saravali (creation story with focus of krishna), and sahaitya-lahiri (devotional bhajans). so i am in no shorta
  18. do you know anything about this bani? if so, please share. so i may too realise this to be as you have. if not, try and find out for me.. (?) if youre not interested, dont post! regarding anti gurmat, whats your take on "sri bhavani lachmi ji sahaee" then its not for us to say what is or isnt in accordance to gurmat. only guru can. we are blind till our Guru shows us. and since you mention metric, "tis ki mit kaun bhakhano" : P hey, on another note, i was also wondering do you have the 2 saloks attributed to guru nanak dev ji at the end of the bhai banno bir? i have them, but its a jo
  19. mere vir ji, thank you for that. I do however know that information, and i have the file, and read it. I am asking if there is another shabad to bhagat soor das ji that was not included. the "chad mun har bimukhan ko sang" is the start of the shabad (more correct if we say 'bhajan') of surdas ji. in this bhajan, there is a rahao line, and 2 pauris. prof sahib singh mentions in "about compilation of SGGS" that Dr SS Kholi says on page 119 of his book that bhagat soor das ji composed 2 shabads. i am wondering whether the "2 shabads" reffered to by Kholi are the 2 pauris of bhagat soor das
  20. there are 2 shabads of bhagat soor das; i am guessing this is the first shabad, what is the second shabad? thanks
  21. people say its out there, i want to know about it. simple. your sarcasm is not appreciated. only post if you want to add to the discussion. not poke your finger in it like the above. thanks.
  22. http://srec.gurmat.info/srecpublications/aboutcompilationofsrigurugranthsahib/chapter10/
  23. thts ok. but its not bani. its not in the damdama sahib bir or kartarpuri bir. it is in the bhai banno bir. only the first line of bhagat soor das was accepted for sggs. the rest of the shabad is largely believed to have been rejected by guru arjun dev ji; and guru arjun dev ji gave the uttar to soordas bani in their shabad 1253 ang in sggs. the second shabad is the meera bai shabad. this was wholely taken out. this alont with naseehatnama, sansarnama, ratanmala (attributed to guru nank dev ji) was also taken out by guru arjun dev ji because it is again largely believed that bhai banno add
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use