khalsaland

You are obviously wrong in your observation....i have with me the exact wordings of the latest resolution...nowhere it mentions that the parkash of Sri Dasam Granth cant be done...What it says is that parkash of ''hor kise granth'' (another granth) cant be done ''barrabar'' (parallel/at par) to Sri Guru Granth Sahib.

It exists. This cult is called Akal Takhat I'm actually surprised that those people who quickly point at the Akal Takhat Gurmatta condemning people rejecting Dasam Granth, are now REJECTING the Gurmatta that specifically REJECTS the practise of doing parkash of both Granth paralell. Most people use Punnu, Dr Jodh Singh and G.S Lamba as their DG protectors - these people themselves say doing parkash of DG along Guru Granth Sahib is wrong. Are you people seriously ok? All Gulshan's done is said "Decisions is already made by Panth. I accept the decision." Again and agian he said "I accept the decision." "I follow the decision? Actually you know what, I think Ghorandhar Veer ji's lost it. He's lost the plot. He's following Akal Takhat to the point. He can't do that. That's not what Sikhs of that Panth do You seriously miss the point here. You obviously dont do the parkash of a granth parallel to Sri Guru Granth Sahib when you have to do katha from it! SRM clearly states that a 'book' (pustak) cannot be 'installed' (asthapna) 'parallel' (vakar/tul) to Sri Guru Granth Sahib. Firstly, Sri Dasam Granth is not a 'pustak'. Secondly, whenever it is parkashed it is not done parallel to Sri Guru Granth Sahib. Even in Hazoor Sahib and Patna Sahib the parkash is not done parallel to Sri Guru Granth Sahib. Give it a thought Ever noticed the parkash of Shasters on the main takhat at Akal Takhat...Sri Guru Granth Sahib is parkashed in the side... Kale Afghaniyes will never understand these intricacies of Maryada

Gulshan proved beyond doubt that he is a Kala Afghaniya in disguise... He claims that the controversy of Sri Dasam Granth has been there since it was compiled...This is a total fallacy. This is what all Kale Afghaniyes claim. And this gives them room and an excuse to keep up their crusade against Dasam Bani. One of the prerequisites of becoming a Granthi of Darbar Sahib is that he should be able to do Katha of Sri Dasam Granth alongwith Sri Guru Granth Sahib, and Vaar Bhai Gurdass. Didnt Gulshan know about this prerequisite when he applied for that job two year in a row? How can anyone do the Katha without doing parkash!! Obviously Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and Sant Kartar Singh Bhindranwale were doing the katha from Sri Dasam Granth when it was being parkashed...Now Gulshan knows about Gurmat which they didnt. Gulshan is criticising the maryada of parkash of Sri Dasam Granth at Patna Sahib and Hazoor Sahib as if these places have started doing the parkash recently. Here is the question: Whey rake up a non-issue when it is not even something new? And that too when the whole panth is concentrated on the Gurgaddi celebrations of Sri Guru Granth Sahib. This is exactly what Darshan Ragi did. He raked up the issue at Hazoor Sahib when it was not even needed. Hazoor Sahib was obviously concentrated on celebrating the Gurgaddi of Sri Guru Granth Sahib. This is why Akal Takhat called the critics of Sri Dasam Granth as mischievous miscreants. People like Gulshan and Darshan are trouble makers who want to divert ordinary Sikh's attention into useless controversies.

Notion of "healthy debates" only holds valid for discussions that are done in a positive spirit, and not for questioning the foundations of a faith. It has been proven beyond doubt that everyone who had criticised Dasam Bani, from Bhag Singh Ambala, to Kala Afghana, to Darshan Ragi had finally crossed their limits. Hence panth had to take actions against them by issuing Hukamnames. Like we cant debate our paternity, we cant debate our religious scriptures...