Jump to content

ssingh92

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ssingh92

  1. Of course it is. as long as the pranees being blessed with Amrit are ok with it!
  2. First you adress babaji and other sant mahapurakhs as " babas and sants" and then you go on to say that they are fools. Im sorry but the word baba or sant cannot be in the same sentence as Fool. We are the fools and they are the babas and sants. they are of such importance in our life that Dhan Sri Guru Arjan Dev Ji Maharaaj wrote bani about them. This Shabad is by Guru Arjan Dev Ji in Raag Gauree on Pannaa 280 sMq kw inMdku mhw AqqweI ] sa(n)th kaa ni(n)dhak mehaa athathaaee || The slanderer of the Saint is the worst evil-doer. sMq kw inMdku iKnu itknu n pweI ] sa(n)th kaa ni(n)dhak khin ttikan n paaee || The slanderer of the Saint has not even a moment's rest. sMq kw inMdku mhw hiqAwrw ] sa(n)th kaa ni(n)dhak mehaa hathiaaraa || The slanderer of the Saint is a brutal butcher. sMq kw inMdku prmysuir mwrw ] sa(n)th kaa ni(n)dhak paramaesur maaraa || The slanderer of the Saint is cursed by the Transcendent Lord. sMq kw inMdku rwj qy hInu ] sa(n)th kaa ni(n)dhak raaj thae heen || The slanderer of the Saint has no kingdom. sMq kw inMdku duKIAw Aru dInu ] sa(n)th kaa ni(n)dhak dhukheeaa ar dheen || The slanderer of the Saint becomes miserable and poor. sMq ky inMdk kau srb rog ] sa(n)th kae ni(n)dhak ko sarab rog || The slanderer of the Saint contracts all diseases. sMq ky inMdk kau sdw ibjog ] sa(n)th kae ni(n)dhak ko sadhaa bijog || The slanderer of the Saint is forever separated. sMq kI inMdw doK mih doKu ] sa(n)th kee ni(n)dhaa dhokh mehi dhokh || To slander a Saint is the worst sin of sins. nwnk sMq BwvY qw aus kw BI hoie moKu ]3] naanak sa(n)th bhaavai thaa ous kaa bhee hoe mokh ||3|| O Nanak, if it pleases the Saint, then even this one may be liberated. ||3||
  3. Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh Until any of you nindaks do the seva, that Dhan Baba Mohinder Singh Ji has done, i do not think it is right to comment and do nindiya. I have not done the seva, hence why i am not commenting, just amazed at some people stupidity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dhan Guru Nanak dev Ji MAHARAAJ Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji MAHARAAJ Dhan Guru Granth Sahib Ji MAHARAAJ Dhan Guru Panth Khalsa Ji MAHARAAJ Waheguru Ji Ka khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh
  4. Thank you for your response veer ji. Perhaps the Soho Road wale will sort out the damp problems by getting a brummie expert on damp problems from the Yellow Pages and asking him to do a full damp proof course on the Harmandir Sahib using silicon injections. To my brothers and sisters on this forum. The damage done by the gold plating bodge up is something that even the GOI failed to do during Bluestar. The Soho Road wale have started the process of destroying the Darbar Sahib though their misguided seva. With damp we will lose the paintings on the walls and eventually the current Darbar Sahib building. As veerji mentions this can be reversed if the Soho Road wale get off their back sides swallow their pride and consult experts. For some reason they are too proud to do this. A shame really as future generations will want to know how the Darbar Sahib building lost its original paintings etc and everyone will point fingers at Bhai Sahib Mohinder Singh and Co. I attach a few pictures of what the paintings on the upper storey staircase looked like earlier this year. I would like to post the message veerji posted on tapoban as it highlights the damage done. "There was an outcry by experts in Punjab. Peopl who are word experts in concservation and achritectural historians. People like Patwant Singh tried extremely hard to get the GNNSJ to see that while the seva was welcome it shoudl be doen properly. Peter Poppham an incredibly well respected journalist from the Independant wrote a 1/2 page articel in 1999 titled "Brummies bodge Sikhs' holy shrine" Peter Popham, 25 September 1999, The Independent. The BBC even carried an investigative piece on the contgroversy titled Gold Service with Dalji Dhaliwal. Its the GNNSJ that is being pig-headed in not accepting that it is totally unnacceptable to remove the original plates whcih were crafted by Ranjit Singh's expert craftsmen and replace them with shoddy copies and it is not acceptable to plaster over centuries old wall paintings and it is not acceptable to leave the Darbar sahib with a really serious case of rising damp and it is not acceptable to put a 21st century rubber membrane on the roof of the builfding (not letting itr breathe and become increasingly damp) like it was some kind of dodgy indian extension in handsworth. aman" Sikh Sangat, is a website which is meant to bring awareness to thre youth of this age. But instead it seems that we want to come on this website and do nindiya and chuugliya of a jathabandi which is lead by a mahapurakh. Is this the sort of stuuf that as a panth we want our youth to hear. Even if you think a jatha of mahapurakh is fake, you should still treat them with utmost respect, they have done more naam abhiyas than we can imagine. so who ever it was who said "their Bhai Saib" should learn some respect and maybe think about themself before doing nindiya of a mahapurak and their jatha
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use