Jump to content

Starsingh

Members
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Starsingh's Achievements

Explorer

Explorer (4/8)

  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Superstar Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

-1

Reputation

  1. thsi reminds me of england in the 60's and 70's hang in their guys , preserve ur identity and u will b fine
  2. as guru ji said never trust a muslim, look hwo bahadur shah paid guru ji back 4 all his help! sent 2 pathans to kill him
  3. If Randhawa is in charge Malhi shud buttout , he throws his weight around as he has MONEYYYYYY!
  4. Controversy works! This is a sad but true reality today amongst our people. I noticed that when I posted topics about Siksh takign themickey about being Siksh for a day durign wedding ceremonies and then cutting their hair b4 reception and how sumting needs to be done, I had a luke warm response and had to keep bumping up the topic to keep it in ur eyes! When i posted a topic about how the SGPC has clearly declared on the 16th Jan that people with cut hair are not sikhs, i had little response. BUT as soon as I post sumthing slightly praising Hindus about the period 652 -1469 ( 900 years approx) before Guru nanaks birth, and about how many brave Hindus must have fought the Muslims after India was first attacked in 652 until guru jis brith in 1469 ( 900 years) otherwise Guru Nanak would have been born a Muslim. I HAD 4 PAGES WORTH OF REPSONSES! I posted that thread sat back and watched..... Why cant we be as passioante about our own SIKHI? and how we are gonna move forward?? Why is always about the so called muslims, hindus etc???? What can we do to move forward without relying on talking abotu Hindus/muslims all the time?? DO I NEED TO BE CONTROVERSAIL TO GET YOUR ATTENTION????
  5. THE ONLY PEOPLE real Sikhs who have made any valid points are traveller and Chhokaranwala and I guess BUNDHA! The rest esp Singhstah whose post i just read fully have written streams of monkey dung! Yeh Singhstah im a RSS agent! lol is that the best u can do? How pathetic. 1. To answer sum 1 elses question, yes I believe being born into a certian religion makes you that religion until u are old enough to decide OTHERWISE! 2. To me I do beleive that Guru Nank started life as a Hindu then chose to form his own Religion/belife system 3. I ASKED FOR SOME PEOPLE with any knowledge to inform me bout the warriors who fought for India between 652 -1469, so that the whole country was not Muslim before guru Nanak was born, because I do feel if they hadnt fought liek they did, guru ji would have been born in a MUSLIM family, as everyone would have been converted! Instead I get all these people posting rubbish bout Hindu this and dat? 4, to answer sum1 else yes I do believe that the Islam invaders agenda was to convert others to ISLAM as they had done the same to MODERN DAY Iran, Iraq, Syria,Yemen, Saudi within 20 years of Mohammeds death. PS : By the time of guru Nanaks birth half of Punjab was Muslim so yeh OBVIOUSLY the agenda of the mulsims was to convert people! Have u 4gotten how they tried to force Guru teg Bahadur to convert too? THANKS TO TRAVELLER,CHHOKARANWALA for trying to provide info botu 652 ad to 1469!
  6. well then singstah u got it wrong then man, as that was not my intention! either I wrote it wrong or u read it wrong. Bhull chuk maafe. Now back to what my ORIGINAL question what happened 652-1469? It would be itneresting to know what transpired druign that period?
  7. 1. I find it very hard to believe that with such a VICIOUS, EVIL Oppressor such as the MUSLIMS any religion could survive without FIGHTING BACK, esp over the period fo 900 years! 2. For the 100th time I was ASKING ABOUT 652 - 1469 NOT what happened after Guru Nanak Dev Ji's BIRTH, DUH!!!! 3. Obviously no one knows botu that period, thats why they keep talkin bout after 1469! THIS I FIND TO BE INTERESTING TO RESEARCH ABOTU AND FIND OUT ABOUT, AS I NEVER DISCUSSED IT B4! PS: Akal Purkh di fauj, dont ever question me botu being sikh, u try being a sikh urself first boy! A sikh doesnt fear asking questions or the answers!
  8. Matheen : 1. At the time of guru Nank Dev ji's birth Sikander Lodhi was King, he was an Afghan not mughal. these peopLe had a very clear agenda to RULE , Conquer and CONVERT The Mughals only arrived in 1520. 2. Chhokranwala said : Other Muslims had been in Punjab under different Turk invaders and Afghans for the previous 400 years at least - (BEFORE Guru Nanak Dev Ji's Birth) AGREED When you look at India at the time of Guru Nanakdevji it was a collection of loads of different countries - Wrong KINGDOMS - NOT COUNTRIES! . West Punjab was mostly Muslim - the eastern side and the Punjab hills were Hindu Muslim states Delhi Sultanate under the Lodhi kings Bahmani Kingdom of the Deccan South India Bengal Gujurat and Malwa Hindu States Rajput Confedaracy under Rana Sanga Vijaynagar of South India Orrisa Assam and eastern India Gondwana It seems going by what u just said the that the Hindus were still in control of the mroe powerful states/fiefdoms in the region?
  9. actually it was the Lodhi Kings who were Afghan in control of the region on paper not mughal. the majority of the region was still Hindu, thanks to resisitance from our punjabi Hindu ancestors Ps im talkin about the pERIOD UP TO Guru Nanak birth 652 - 1469 !
  10. Oh come on yaar, lets ptu our anti Hindu thought aside for a moment at be FAIR ; the truth is : 1. Guru Nanak Dev Ji was born a Hindu in 1469, and thats me , a pretty hardcore SIKH admitting it! Because I understand that you cant change history to suit yourself! He was raised a Hindu until he started sikhi in 1500. 2. No matter what you say, had these HINDUS not defended India so well for 900 years, (between 652-1469), the whole of PUNJAB would have been Muslim by the time Guru Nanak was born, and he himself would have been born a Muslim ,and hence no SIKHI??? 3. These PUNJABI Hindus are our Ancestors, whose descendants later became sikhs. RESPECT
  11. Mods please EDIT my HEADING, as its Guru NANAK not Nanal obviously! its a typo , SORRY
  12. I had very interesting talk with a learned Sikh history working at the library in havelock gurdwara and the conversation basically went like this and ended with a question : 1. India was first attcked in 652 by the Turkhs - Muslims 2. Guru Nanak Dev Ji was born a Hindu in 1469 3. Therefore India was defended between 652 - 1469 ( 900 years) by brave HINDUS, which ensured that by the time of Guru Nanaks birth he was born a HINDU 4. Had these HINDUS not defended India so well ( between 652-1469), the whole of PUNJAB would have been Muslim by the time Guru Nanak was born, and he himslef would have been born a Muslim ,and hence no SIKHI??? 5. These Punjabi Hindus are our ANCESTORS!!! So who were they? I respect BRAVERY from any religion and race so I give these poeple RESPECT! BUT WHO WERE THEY? ANYONE KNOW BOUT THIS PERIOD 652 TO 1469?
  13. Ok I will, but what are you doign abotu it? Why dotn you talk to your local gurdwara members adn get it stopped then? PS : follow my lead in making sure anyone you know is sikh for the whole day, when they get married in gurdwara! Can u get respect for sggs campaing involved?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use