H4RPAL

Is there not another near Anandpur Sahib?? Or what is significant about the horse there?? They have built a special room for it with a ceiling fan.

Do you mean the descendent Of Guru Ji's Horse, the one that is kept somewhere around Anandpur Sahib?

Is this gonna be staged at the University? Or elsewhere in the city??

Its funny how people who want to kill this topic keep posting and bumping it to the top of the list again.

it wasnt me who swore...i was just telling you all what the guy said to his wife...its not like I swore.....im so sorry...but i'll give you guys a hint...hmm...i wonder if admin will get mad though....here it goes: the word also means #2 ...(as in....it means poo) and yeah...it WASNT me who swore...it was just somethine the guy said to his wife...thats all.... me not bad....right admin? 130544[/snapback] I was only kidding

U talkin to me????

I have previosuly never heard these suggestions that Niddar and Teja were formerly AKJ. Where did you learn of this?

lol, if you actually read my post, i said "he might have been, he might not have been" amazing once you read ones post you dont need to ask the same question again hunaa? lol sorry im knit picking. well, i thought he was namdhari because a) the way he tied his dastaar b) the kapri wasnt actually gyaani style or anything like it, it was tight at the bottom, which is somethoing i dont see in our guru ghar c) notice he had no kakkars d) seemed very very strict in his own maryada. never seen someone so tall yet so skinny. but in answer to that you can say a) you cant judge someone by the paag they wear. i have come across taksalis who wear nok paags, my first impression were they were akj, but after speaking to them they were in fact taksali. b) again assumptions you cant judge in that way. c) how do i know he wasnt wearing his kirpaan underneath his kurta, or wasnt wearing a small one or didnt wear one in his dastaar? d) he could be bibeki. coming from there, i thought say if a namdhari did come to a gurughar (as i said, he might have been, he might not have been, but the sangat there were doing his chugli and saying it was obvious he was namdhari...what they pinpointed i didnt bother listening to). anyhow, say if a namdhari came to the guru ghar, would he be welcomed (bearing in mind the story i came across!) gustaphi maaf 130757[/snapback] Do Namdharis not wear kakkars?? Your point C suggests this is the case, I always believed they wore all 5 kakkars. Many Gurdwaras have Namdhari "visitors," especially in places where there aren't "Namdhari Gurdwaras." For this reason, I assume they would be welcomed ok, but your example seems to indicate differently as per the chugli comment. Does anyone else find it weird how sometimes we own and disown Namdharis?? I was recently at a talk about 84 where there part of the speech focused on the price Sikhs paid for Indian independence, and as part of this price was included the Namdhari contribution within the "Kooka Movement."

Where did you gather Amritpal Singh was AKJ? From the fact that the llink was posted by AKJ Chandigarh?? I believe on the site it says Amritpal took Amrit at Hazoor Sahib ( I may be incorrect) but I seem to recall this from one of the articles, and thus if you wish to classify him, I suppose the term Hazoori would be most appropriate. However, he questions much of Hazoori Maryada too, and as such classification as Hazoori would be problematic. But this does not mean he is AKJ.

Its appears as though this is a hidden section on the website at present, as there are no links to take you to this section either. Should be an intersting read when its up. I'm expecting a well-researched and evidence-laden comparison if material on other associated sites is anything to go by.

In the extract you have provided, where does it state this description applies to maha-kaal? Is this not more likely to be a description of Kaal rather than maha kaal?

Darn you people, lowering the moral tone of a quality thread like this with profanity.

It's not as if the guy was preching, and looking to convert from what I can see. Who knows, maybe by going to the Gurdwara this guy might himself realise the identity of the true Guru, so who are we to prevent anyone?

lol start a new thread about that then. This thread is for moaning about girls, and looking for an explanation for the phenomenon that has been described.

Shouldn't everyone regardless of faith or beliefs be welcomed into out Guru ghars? LOL love the undercover pics though, lol- did he even catch you snapping away??

Really don't see what the fuss is- had them once in America after hearing rave reviews, and was quite disappointed. Also, are they meant to taste kinda stale???

I'm not sure the poster was reffering to Amritdhari girls. I got the impression they meant girls from Amritdhari families (ie with Amritdhari parents, and as such not neccesarilly Amritdhari themselves).

I'm pretty certain he doesn't. You even surprised his stalker Kumi with that comment.

It's just lust mate. Lust is bad, get over it.

Why did it take you two posts to say that??? Not so smart yourself are you bro??

**NOTE BEFORE YOU TAKE THIS QUIZ** This Quiz is made only for smart people. 128961[/snapback] DAMN!!!!..... Why didn't u tell me before I took it???????

Awww i only got 7.

128547[/snapback] Have you got the link for the thread so we can see if more information is posted please?

Well said, lol, but you've got to love the innocence and naiievity of the approach. They accidentally made a compromise which forwarded the belief that keski is essential. People should believe what they wish, and in the scenario described, it is acceptable that the kesh camp were made to change their minds by the keski camp, who were obviously by far the smarter, as the compromise shows. However, the rule they created just simply cannot be universalised, as it is an absolute farce when suggested to be a compromise

I think you're breaking the rules- you're not allowed to discuss whether keski or kesh is kakkar on this forum, or so I understand.