-
Posts
1,218 -
Joined
-
Days Won
19
Content Type
Profiles
Calendar
Forums
Everything posted by WaljinderSingh
-
Are you sure Punjab Govt was responsible for bringing the idea, plan and complete it?
- 5 replies
-
- viraasat e khalsa
- sikh museum
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
http://www.justgiving.com/seva84 http://www.justgiving.com/khalsaaid
-
:respect:
-
Bhai Bachhitar Singh Ji
WaljinderSingh replied to babbarkhalsa84's topic in GURBANI | SAKHIAN | HISTORY
Could be yes. -
Bhai Bachhitar Singh Ji
WaljinderSingh replied to babbarkhalsa84's topic in GURBANI | SAKHIAN | HISTORY
I doubt Bhai Bachitar Singh ji was a child since he was a bodyguard of Guru Gobind Singh ji and used to guard the room where Guru ji used to rest at night. -
No worries. Some brother already helped me out. Thanks anyway .
-
bump
-
Waheguru ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru ji Ka Fateh ji, Sangat ji, is there anyone from Southampton UK or knows the area please pm ASAP. it is urgent. Thanks in advance. Gurfateh
-
Waheguru ji
-
The federal government has been low-balling the public for years on how much debt it actually has, a University of California, San Diego economics professor says, adding that the real amount is $70 trillion – not $16.9 trillion. James Hamilton's claim the United States is in a much deeper financial hole than many realize comes as Congress gets ready for another budget battle when lawmakers return in September. Both sides have been digging in on their policy positions over the debt, spending and the country's future fiscal health. Hamilton believes the government is miscalculating what it owes by leaving out certain unfunded liabilities that include government loan guarantees, deposit insurance, and actions taken by the Federal Reserve as well as the cost of other government trust funds. Factoring in those figures brings the total amount the government owes to a staggering $70 trillion, he says. Hamilton believes important areas of federal off-balance-sheet commitments include loans for post-high school education, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Reserve System. “The biggest off-balance-sheet liabilities come from recognition of the fiscal stress that will come in the form of an aging population and rising medical expenditures,” Hamilton says, adding, “It is worth noting that there are many historical episodes in which off-balance sheet liabilities ended up having quite significant on-balance sheet implications.” For example, he says, fiscal problems stemming from the saving and loans crisis from the 1980s. “Losses at these institutions ended up dwarfing the capabilities of the now-defunct Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation to honor its promise to guarantee depositors,” he says. The final on-balance-sheet cost to taxpayers honoring those guarantees came out to $124 billion. Hamilton isn’t the first economist to say the government understates how much it owes. Claims that the real liability facing the government is $70 trillion date back several years. David Walker, former U.S. Comptroller and CEO of the Comeback America Initiative, made similar claims in 2012. Walker’s calculations include unfunded Social Security, Medicare and retiree pension promises. Boston economists Laurence Kotlikoff and Scott Burns warned in a 2008 Forbes article about what could happen if the government doesn’t curb its spending. “The earthquake will come via a collapse in the market for U.S. government bonds as domestic and foreign investors realize that the only way Uncle Sam can meet his future spending obligations is to print massive quantities of money,” they said. “The result will be sky-high inflation and interest rates and, most surely, a prolonged reduction in output and employment. This could happen today. It could happen tomorrow. But it will happen here just as it has happened in every other country that tried to spend far beyond its ability to pay.” Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/15/california-economist-says-real-us-debt-70-trillion-not-16-trillion-government/?test=latestnews
-
Ok the Times of India (TOI) is also fake when they did not check if the tweeter's acc. was fake or not and put up the news ..? Must be according to you.. I don't have a twitter account and if I make one then...?
-
"Killings of Sikhs in 1984 was need of the hour." Tweet by Mr. Azhar, Congress leader and Gen. Sec. of NSUI (Student wing of Congress party) North West Distt. Mumbai. Shameless creatures, do not deserve to be called human. They will definitely pay for their sins. सिख दंगों को जरूरी बता कर फंसे कांग्रेस नेता नई दिल्ली ।। इशरत जहां एनकाउंटर केस के बहाने नरेंद्र मोदी को घेरने की कोशिश में एक कांग्रेस नेता ने न केवल वरिष्ठ बीजेपी नेताओं को समाजविरोधी करार दिया बल्कि 84 में हुए सिखों के नरसंहार को भी वक्त की जरूरत बता दिया। हालांकि, बाद में उन्होंने इस बयान पर सफाई देते हुए माफी भी मांगी। इशरत एनकाउंटर केस को लेकर सोशल साइटों पर भी माहौल गरमाया हुआ है। इसके पक्ष और विरोध में तीखी बहस चल रही है। इसी बहस के दौरान ट्विटर पर अजहर नाम के एक शख्स ने मोदी, आडवाणी, राजनाथ और सुषमा स्वराज का नाम लेते हुए उन्हें समाजविरोधी तत्व बता दिया। इसके जवाब में उनसे पूछा गया कि आप 84 में होने वाले 4000 सिखों के नरसंहार पर क्या कहेंगे जिसे राजीव गांधी ने 'जब बड़ा पेड़ गिरता है...' वाले बयान से सही ठहराने की कोशिश की थी? इस पर आईएम अजहर ने पूरी बेशर्मी से कहा, 'सिखों को मारना उस वक्त की जरूरत थी।' गौर करने की बात है कि यह अजहर कोई आम शख्स नहीं बल्कि कांग्रेस के एक नेता हैं। उनके ट्विटर अकाउंट पर दिए गए परिचय के मुताबिक वह एनएसयूआई के नॉर्थ-वेस्ट डिस्ट्रिक्ट मुंबई इकाई के महासचिव हैं। बहस में कांग्रेस के यह नेता यहीं नहीं रुके। जब उनके इस बयान की प्रतिक्रिया में उन्हें लोगों ने घेरते हुए कहा कि 'आपने अपना असली सांप्रदायिक, आपराधिक और हिंसक रूप दिखा दिया' तो उन्होंने जवाब में दलील दी कि स्वर्ण मंदिर में बैठे सिख कोई स्वतंत्रता सेनानी नहीं थे। वे सत्ता के लिए अपने ही देशवासियों से लड़ रहे थे।' बाद में जब उन पर चारों तरफ से हमला होने लगा और उनके लिए अपना बचाव करना मुश्किल होने लगा तो उन्होंने यह कहते हुए अपना बयान वापस ले लिया कि 'मैं 84 के सिख नरसंहार को गलती से ऑपरेशन ब्लू स्टार समझ बैठा था। माफ करें।' बाद में उन्होंने वे विवादास्पद ट्वीट भी डिलीट कर दिए। लेकिन तब तक मामला काफी आगे बढ़ चुका था। http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/photomazaashow/20945510.cms http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/india/national-india/Congress-leader-apologises-after-defending-84-sikh-riots/articleshow/20945082.cms#gads
-
Ask Dharmi about it veer.
-
Dharmi ji, I asked many Taksali Singhs the meaning of the word in the line which you send. None of them could give me the answer. I hope you are right when you say 73...
-
Question Bout Khalistan - Technicalities
WaljinderSingh replied to Hammertime007's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
If Khalistan will be formed it will be formed by 'Sant Khalsa'. Most of the so called wise Sikhs ( including the ones on this forum) are Bheikhi. Lift your jeevan high with Kehni and Karni and Guru Granth Sahib will grant its Khalsa Raaj they deserve. -
At the time of the incident it did not get much attention but it is always feels good to read such things.
-
This happened march
-
yawn.. Is this new? Even the Akal Takht Jathedaar knows these types of activities Badal does when he gave the title : 'Faqr - e - Quam' .
-
The Way Our Earth Orbits Around The Sun
WaljinderSingh replied to WaljinderSingh's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
up and down (relative to the galactic plane) helical motion orbiting the galactic centre -
The Way Our Earth Orbits Around The Sun
WaljinderSingh replied to WaljinderSingh's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
This should be taught in schools. -
The Way Our Earth Orbits Around The Sun
WaljinderSingh replied to WaljinderSingh's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
All the stars move around the centre of the milky way in a up and down movement as shown in the second video together which includes the asteroid belt and the kuiper belt veere. -
The Way Our Earth Orbits Around The Sun
WaljinderSingh replied to WaljinderSingh's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
Well what is the significance thinking the earth is flat and sun orbits around the earth? These videos show facts that the planets do not orbit the sun in a circular plane as taught in schools.
