Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Ranjeet01

  1. Reading the reports on the media, Nov 11th (Armistice Day) is coinciding with the protests. Will be interesting to see what will happen . The Jewish supporters are pointless in doing their protests. Israel are going to do what they feel like anyway. Why put yourself in the way of trouble. Let the Goy fight amongst themselves. Their energies would be better placed elsewhere in my opinion. In 2003, before the Iraq war. There was a 1 million march and it did nothing to stop the invasion.
  2. No I do not think so. Most Sikhs would prefer to live under a racist white regime than under Sharia rule.
  3. Their unity is based on having an enemy. When they cannot have an enemy , they turn on themselves
  4. The problem is a semitic problem. Globally both sides are as bad as each other. They are sadistic and evil as each other. You can empathise with a Palestinian to certain extent but make no mistake those innocent Palestinians can turn on you in an instant. That is why you have to mindful of the compassion you show towards them. And if the tables were turned with Israel you would see a completely different side to them. The muslim approach is to behave in an orc (Lord of the Rings)like manner . The Jewish approach is to infiltrate the upper echelons of their host societies. In the west, you are very unlikely to interact with a jew unless you operate in the upper circles. The only way for the world to get better would be de-abrahamise and de-arabise this region.
  5. Our capacity for violence is greater but we have different attitude to living by the sword than they have. Our relationship to the shaster is one of reverance and respect. But in your reply, you have shown a quality that Sikhs typically have that muslim in general don't. And that is the level of humility and introspection to look at our own flaws.
  6. They are a violent people, the tried and tested way is to mete out even more violence against them. That is the language they understand. The more violent you are, the less violent and more reasonable they become. You will see how quickly they capitulate and go into "treaty" mode. Our violence comes from defense, theirs come from where there is no resistance. They are bullies.
  7. It gives an interesting insight into the muslim psyche. Muslim kill Muslim: no outrage Muslim kill non-Muslim: no outrage Non-Muslim kill Muslim: outrage, but this is conditional. Broken down to: Non-muslim kill non-Arab Muslim: some outrage, but down the pecking order. Unapologetic Non-Muslim kill non-arab Muslim: even less outrage as Muslim gets scared. Non-muslim kill Arab muslim: complete uproar. What needs to be seen is how a non-apologetic genocidal ruthless non-muslim kill arab muslim. People may think the Israelis are, but the Jews could easily wipe out the Gazan population if they wanted to. If the Jews were sadistic, they would flood those tunnels where the Hamas are holed up. However, there are calls for a ceasefire and the concern is those 2 million Gazans being refugees and shoved into Europe. We are seeing what is happening with all these Syrians and Iraqis coming into Europe.
  8. The muslim countries do not care about the Palestinians as they are quite troublesome. However, because Israel is there then they seem to show some care for the Palestinians. The muslim's problem with Israel is that it is Jewish. The Gulf countries (with exception of Qatar) are more interested in fermenting economic links with Israel. Here some facts about the Palestinians. Most of the population of Jordan is Palestinan and they tried to overthrow the monarchy there. Read up about Black September. Do you know who helped out the Jordanians, the Pakistanis. Lebanon had a civil war from about 1975 to 1990. Do you know how it largely? The very large Palestinian refugee camps there. PLO was based in Lebanon. Kuwait had a large Palestinian population. When Iraq invaded Kuwait, who did the Palestinians support? The Iraqis. The Kuwaitis expelled the Palestinians. Now with the Gaza war, there is pressure for Egypt to accept the Gazans by opening up the border. Egypt is reluctant to, even though between 1948 to 1967 they controlled Gaza. That is because once the Gazans leave for Egypt, Israel will never allow them back. The Israelis in my view are playing a very clever game. They allowed for Oct 7th to happen, so they can create the circumstances to push the Gazan population to the southern part. My observations is that they will probably reduce the Palestinian population drastically not through genocide but by pushing them into Egypt. Northern Gaza will probably be some militarized buffer zone and Hamas will largely be eradicated. What remains of Gaza will be a rump strip even tinier than before. Once they have dealt with Gaza, they will try to normalise relations with Saudi Arabia. Then they will either go for Iran, which if there is ever a regime change there could mean dried up support for Hezbollah which means Israel will shore up their Northern borders.
  9. The Gulf states are run by the kaffirs. They are ones who keep everything running. If it was 100 percent momins, it would not run. There is no real alpha-ness with muslims. It is just bravado and cockiness. The moment they get stood up to, you see how quickly they back down Those orthodox jews are only against the state of Israel because they are waiting for the messiah. They will be waiting forever to happen. Yet at the sametime they go and live/visit Israel anyway. Watch what they do, not what they say.
  10. You said in a previous if this was period of swords and houses and I showed you an example that this was not always the case.
  11. No they won't In an era of horses and swords, our ancestors beat their a$$. "Jo Bole So Nihal" is a far more frightening battle cry than "Allah hu Akbar" Even in that era, people less in numbers can defeat people of larger numbers.
  12. I think this true. The only real celebrity converts they get are the black ones, who think that they are escaping their slavery roots whereas the Arabs were extensively involved in slave trade. You see the white female ones and they start off with hijabs, over time they get lax with it and eventually the hijab comes off. I would say there are far more neo buddhist whites than white muslim converts but because they don't brag about it, you won't hear about it. Also, buddhists are far more synchretic, but this I mean you can attach it to any culture, you will still be attached to your cultural roots. Whereas Islam ,you no longer have any attachment to the culture you come from as you shift your allegiance to Arabism. The shift in European pre-Christian religions is already taking place. What muslims have is their hubris, and you are quite correct in that if whites took the gloves off, they would wipe out the muslims. But from our perspective, we do not wish to be part of the backlash.
  13. No, I don't think so. The number of coverts they do get, they lose quickly afterwards. It's just they publicise it more when they get one. Don't fall for the algorithms.
  14. I think the Jews are fighting with one hand behind their back. Hamas have taken hostages and there are a lot of underground tunnels So their concern is rescuing the hostages. This is seen as weakness by muslim. However, if the gloves ever really came off, Gaza could easily be flattened. Muslims would be whining as well as their leftist allies. What I have learnt is that if muslims are whining, they must be doing something right. The occupied lands in West Bank is occupied by the high breeding religious Jews. However, a lot of the secular Jews complain about the religious Jews not pulling their weight in terms of provided army recruits and not contributing to the economy. Street thuggery can easily be dealt with, but there does not seem to be any will. Like with mob violence, you take out leaders and you watch how they scramble. Then the taqqiyah tactics come out. You being from Slough should understand this very well.
  15. I do like Scott Ritter's analysis But he is a former UN weapon inspector who now lives in Russia, so he will have some degree of anti-Israel bias. However, if his assessment is correct in that potentially there is an exodus of jews out of Israel, where are going to go. Western Europe is out of the question, US maybe problematic for them. Would Eastern Europe be somewhere for them, but would East Europe want them? Russia? A lot of Jews left the old Soviet Union. Ukraine, which is a warzone. Maybe an island in the middle of the ocean. Miles aways from all other people living in complete exile?
  16. The Muslims are not really winning against the west, they are being allowed to. If the Europe was to be overtaken over, the Muslims will lose because it would become the sh1thole they left. If hypothetically the Whites became Muslim, they will invade the middle east and these Arabs would be under the jack boot of the white muslim. It would be like Ottomans before when they had the middle east under their control. Muslims have no issue with being other muslims massacring them. i can guarantee to you if a White Muslim country invaded Palestine, you would not hear the "Free Free Palestine" The Jews don't really give a cr@p about Hindutva. The only reason Hindutva is up the back-side of Israelis is because of what they perceive of a common enemy. Muslim MPs will speak up for Sikhs because it is in their interest to do so. However, the enemy of my enemy is not always my friend.
  17. That is a concern that we will feel the brunt. The Muslims cannot win an open war unless they have overwhelming power. It was only the Ottomans that had any power, but their power had been waning before World War 1. Their political ideology (which Islam is) needs to be completely routed. Their ummah needs to be de-programmed. Their clerics in my opinion need to be taken out. The clues to tackle them is there in their ideology, it is in plain sight. They have given the ammunition to deal with them. It is not enough to defeat them and then let them build up their strength again. Once defeated, islam needs to be completely obliterated. The goal should in be intact is to de-abrahamise the world and re-dharmify it. Europe is on it's way of de-Christianising but it should not be islamised. The middle east should return back to what is was pre-Jesus (if Jesus actually existed)
  18. Many people side with Jews not because of any love of the Jews or because of all the Muslim countries but primarily because they have been attacked by Muslims or have some historical animosity with Muslims. If it is really boiled down to the it's essential ingredients: it is muslim vs non muslim. The thing that worries us kafirs is that if Israel and Jews are done with, the Muslims will get emboldened and start on the rest of us. The Jews are a buffer against the Islamic onslaught. This is what could possibly happen: The whites of Europe at this current moment in time have no stomach for a fight, however if push come to shove, they will start to get organised and fight back. It is the government and the institutions like the media that allow Muslims to get away with all the actions. The European people and society is built on some degree of trust with their institutions but this is getting eroded. People talk about demographics but this is dependant on the democratic system. However, if the media and institutions were completely discarded by the host community and they take things into their own hands, no amount of muslim breeding is going to save the Muslims. They live in enclaves which can easily be enclosed and held under seige. For every terrorist attack, I would expect muslim enclaves to be completely extinguished. I expect eventually there will be a ban on Islam in society or at least a severe curtailment. The goal would be reduce the demographics considerably. New rules will be enforced on Muslims. Something of this effect: Leave Islam or leave for a muslim country. No muslim will be allowed to have more than 2 children. Any extra children, the child will be given to a non muslim family. Muslim men cannot have non muslim women to convert. Every Muslim female should marry non muslim man and no longer be muslim. Any threats by the muslim community means that those muslim men cannot breed and should be castrated, then further efforts should be taken to take more of their muslim women. Every sh1t stirring mullah will be taken away. Any bit of taqqiyah will be dealt with. These are a hotchpotch of stuff but these kind of things may eventually be implemented. Legally, Islam will be redefined as a banned political ideology rather than a religion. Once you take a Muslims ability to breed and to spread their ideology, they lose all their power.
  19. This woman has those eyes that look through you not at you. There is no soul behind those eyes.
  20. Both Jews and Muslims who have in group preference love to play the victim card. They are what people call cry bullies. If anything, this has brought out the Islamic populations out of the woodwork in Europe and the west The question now posed to European countries is that they have brought in too many migrants and it is causing problems in their countries. The mood of some commentators is mass deportation. The elites in my view have deliberately created this situation to forment trouble so that they can create conflict so that they maintain control by divide and rule tactics. I don't think Europeans typically like the Jews and probably were quite glad that they don't have the Jewish populations they had pre WW2. Which is why they are either indifferent or sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. However, I don't think the Jews have forgiven the Europeans either even though they have their own nation. They have been looking to f*** them up. The Jews are a peculiar bunch as even though there was a holocaust and they have their promised land, you are seeing these guys going back to places like Berlin and Poland which seems strange since everything that has happened there, why they want to go back? I am also suspicious of how this Hamas attack took place as Israel is not big place. They are quite a neurotic and paranoid lot, I think they deliberately let this slide. If this is the case then it would mean that certain Jews are throwing other Jews under the bus for whatever excuse they need. This was quite a surprise to me, however maybe the Jews are not the elite but maybe they make up some of this elite I have a feeling that the elites are part of a cult and they are related to the Muslim and Jews since both these faiths are really a hotchpotch of middle Eastern pagan traditions. This cult is some Middle Eastern pagan cult.
  21. You can refrain from killing innocents, but unfortunately this is a war situation. Innocents are going to be killed. I do not agree with killing innocents, but this is the state of war, I don't like it either. However, people consider the innocents of their own side over the innocents of the other side. It said that two wrongs don't make it right, but the situation/scenario people find themselves in is revenge. That is just the way it is. Everything you believe in, the higher ethics, morality goes out the window. If refugees coming from Western Punjab are telling people from Eastern Punjab what has been happening plus with a lot of muslims in East Punjab getting emboldened by what is going on as well the majority of police of Punjab being Muslim and tolerating the atrocities of Muslims on the non Muslims, what do you think will happen? You got to remember places like Jalandhar were majority Muslim. Even the villages in some of the districts were majority Muslim. The innocents of the otherside become fair game. In general us Sikhs have far higher tolerance threshold than the other communities but when that tolerance breaks, our capacity for violence is far higher than Muslims or Hindus. It is like a person who is not quick tempered but when they lose their temper, they really lose it. It is really easy about holding the higher ground in hindsight but in midst of all this you are not going to be clear headed.
  22. Gandhi was very peculiar as he walked around with the Bhagavad Gita in hand not taking into account what Krishna told Arjun to do in Mahabharat. Arjun like the rest of the Pandavas were very reluctant to kill their own cousins the Kauravas. He instructed Arjun to do his duty after showing his true form. If Gandhi followed Krishna's philosophy he would never allow for Pakistan to be created. He would have done his duty and follow dharma even if it meant going to war to the muslims.
  23. Adharmi and Dharmi live by different set of rules. The Aharmi will use the Dharmi rules against Dharmi. It is like bringing a knife to the gun fight. The Adharmi is under no obligation to bring the knife. Dharmi cannot prevail in these circumstances. You put yourself into a straight jacket.
  24. When survival is at stake, all the virtue signalling goes out of the window. At that moment of time, living by higher values gets you slaughtered. For dharma to prevail adharmic things have to be done. Do what needs to be done, ensure your survival and then you can self reflect in all the bad things you had to do, and feel shame. If you want to ensure that you want to live by higher values, you need to put the mechanisms in place like not having adharmi people and ideologies to take precedence in your society.
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use