Mahakaal96
-
Posts
309 -
Joined
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Calendar
Forums
Everything posted by Mahakaal96
-
Stupid bander -
What a load of rubbish! Coconuts are used during Dasam & Sarbloh akhand paths.... especially during Dasam. According to these 2 clowns Tilak is ok but coconut is brahminvaad.... hahahaha..... Brahmins also do tilak brahmins also believe in amritvela, ishnan, Kirtan, naam..... won’t be long before our ‘Dr’s & ‘professors’ start calling these brahminvaad For the few on this site that may have some brain cells that work, please read Gurbani paat darpan by Baba Gurbachan Singh Bhindranwale to learn why coconut is used. Might be a good idea to learn what ‘bipran ke reet’ actually is before denouncing everything as brahminvaad
-
Maybe you should have a look on this site & see what I have posted in the past regarding the use of cannabis & medicine containing alcohol.... Your original post did not sound like it was referring to medicinal levels of alcohol.
-
You ain’t a man
-
Listen MahanSula.... if those are your views then goodluck to you.... knock yourself out & enjoy all the sex & alcohol you want if they bring you happiness. Your right.... mahraj does give all answers so why don’t you take your questions direct to mahraj?! This forum is used by young people.... I know exactly what your angle is... but won’t work here.....
-
It was Laxmi who took avtar as Raja Janaks daughter Sita.... not mahalaxmi. Theres a big difference between Laxmi & Mahalaxmi. Whenever I come on this site there’s always same lot commenting on every topic regardless of whether they have enough knowledge on the subject of the topic or not.... it’s pathetic that some people either think they are possessed with so much gyan that they can answer on any topic or that they have nothing better to do then spend most their time on a website that has become an accumulation of the dumb & retarted. If anyone is under the illusion that the panth is headed in the right way they should come on this site & read the utter bakwas on here.
-
Modern day Panjabi names & how terrible they are.
Mahakaal96 replied to Gagan1995's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
Maybe you should go and read Guru Gobind Singh Ji’s account of what happened between Indra & the Brahmins wife before giving the maha-gyani speeches on here..... your version of events is based on granths written by Brahmins & the rubbish they show on modern adaptations on TV! As you pointed out to a member above that Sanskrit is not our heritage.... Brahmins & their granths are not our heritage... the Bani of Guru sahib is. Read what Mahraj says about Indra & the Brahmins wife.... see who tricked/enticed who.... sure you and your feminist lot will enjoy reading it -
Proof of Singhs doing jhata of goats at Madho Das dera!
Mahakaal96 replied to shastarSingh's topic in POLITICS | LIFESTYLE
Where in GGSJ does it say wear 5 kakkars?! the khalsa’s maryada does not come from GGSJ Your mother who gave birth to you also has the above inclinations.... but as a child you consumed her milk... and was born from within her body This site needs to be renamed ‘Spastic Sangat’ Stop wasting your time on here talking utter bakvas.... go read Bani & do some simran & build your avasthas -
Not true. Your question is a reflection of the type of men you keep sangat with, look up to & learn from. Read Charitropakhyan & you will realise the lengths women had to go to in order to seduce a real man.
-
No, Bedi lineage links back to Kush (Son of Ram Chander) Trehan lineage links back to Lakshman (brother of Ram Chander) Bhalla lineage to Bharat (brother of Ram Chander) Sodhi lineage links back to Luv (Son of Ram Chander)
-
Bedi, Trehan, Bhalla & Sodhi are all descended from Raghu lineage, which is from Ishvaku lineage & links back to Surya lineage.
-
Not true. Guru Nanak Dev Ji was Bedi lineage Guru Angad Dev Ji was trehan lineage Guru Amar Das Ji was bhalla lineage Guru Ram Das Ji to Guru Gobind Singh Ji were Sodhi lineage Read bachitter natak, it covers how long the gurgaddi would stay in the bedi lineage & the Sodhi lineage.... once you get a grasp of that you realise the sons of Guru Nanak were never meant to get gurgaddi..... so people who say Baba Sri Chand & Baba Lakmi Chand ‘failed’ as the sons of Guru Nanak don’t know what they are talking about!
-
This site should be renamed as Spastic Sangat
-
Rules for Kathawachiks and preachers...
Mahakaal96 replied to MokhamSingh's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
If I remember correctly are you referring to the 14 attributes the kathavachik should possess & the 14 attributes the listener should possess? Goodluck in this time & age.... a handful of old kathavachiks do possess the attributes but majority of sangat these days are a bunch of stupid dhangers with no intelligence... just have a look at the state of this site. Even those people who cant even recite penti, have no kamai & never learnt from a Sant or mahapurekh think they know it all. -
When the maharaja of patiala sold out to the British and tricked the Nihangs into attending a meeting where close to 30,000 Nihangs were murdered whilst they slept what did the sikhs do to help the Nihangs? when the British adopted a shoot on site policy to deal with any Nihangs who survived the massacre at patiala what did the sikhs do to help the Nihangs? When Nihangs were forced to go into exile to Hazur sahib did the sikhs in panjab do anything to support thier Gurus fauj? When the sgpc was formed & Nihangs were being forcefully removed by sikhs & even refused langar at gurughars where was the panths support for Gurus fauj? Nihangs were denied any money from Gurus golak despite Guru Sahib giving a hukamnama that his fauj had first rights to funds from the golak for the upkeeping of fine horses & weapons why did the panth forget about the fauj? fast forward 100 years.... the panth & sants who had placed their faith in the formation of sgpc 100 years earlier at the expense of Gurus fauj now cry out asking for help from the fauj as the reality of sgpc sets in. Now all of a sudden a fauj that was close to extinction 100 years ago with no funds for weapons & horses are supposed to be saviours of the same panth that abandoned them. Everyone has to take responsibility for the mistakes made by both sides..... in the 1980s we had kharkus & Nihangs killing each other over issues like eating meat..... how pathetic is that, sikhs killing each other over what we eat to keep this temporary body alive. The whole panth needs to learn from our mistakes & wake up to how we have been played & divided by our enemies. Mahraj kirpa kare the panth unites & everyone carries out the seva they were supposed to do
-
During Baba Santa Singhs time Budha Dal had its own printing press. It was impossible to get a copy of the teeka or Sarbloh granth without making a request in person at Budha Dal. It’s possible the mass printing started towards the end of his life as he was bed bound. Students being taught Sarbloh Bani would still have to be taught about its background & authenticity as a preparation to face questions regarding authenticity & as a general lesson in the history of Sarbloh Granth. It’s important to know the unthanika of each Bani/pangti but also just as important to know the historical facts about the granth itself. In Vedic scholarly dharmic granths are measured against the 3 farmaans (lokic, Vedic, swaiy) & then judged on vishashta, samanta & bugta...... students would need all the historical background & evidence etc to have this level of knowledge about the granth Baba Gurbachan Singh Bhindranwale warned his students that in the future an attack will be launched against Sri Dasam Granth. Baba Ji’s instructions were that established/older vidyartis should counter the attack & that no one from Taksal should doubt Dasam Bani & fall for the lies of the opposition. This warning was given despite Taksalis being adherents of Sri Dasam Granth. In regards to Khalsa Mehima I think this was added by Dasam Mahraj at Sri Sarbloh Bunga Hazur sahib. It’s possible it existed separately, similar to how different banis from Dasam Granth were first in separate granths. Khalsa mehima is praise of Khalsa.... it does not contain anything that needs to be kept gupt.... the Nihangs openly did kirtan of Khalsa mehima
-
My posts have to be ‘approved’ by the moderators before they can be posted. In most cases it takes several hours & the last post I made on a topic never even showed up
-
Maharaja Ranjit Singh was whipped for marrying a musalmani It was Jussa Singh Ramgharia who was punished for dying his beard. The incident is mentioned in katha by Sant Mohan Singh Bhindranwala jatha bhindran.
-
‘Veda Koran bible do not say they are false, false are those who do not contemplate’ meaning, the Vedas, Koran & bible are not false because they contemplate parmeshvar, those who do not contemplate parmeshvar are false. Essentially it’s the contemplation of parmeshvar that is being exalted here above all else regardless of faith or religion etc
-
Prominent scholars, sants & jathedars from Taksal, Budha Dal, nirmala sampardai & Hazur Sahib are all universally agreed that the Hukamnama from Mata Sundri Ji is genuine. If I remember correctly Mata Ji had Guru Sahibs mohr which would have been on the hukamnama. PP & SP may have been written years later but they were written by gursikhs of the highest calibre who came from strong gursikh families. Banda Bahadurs exemplary & praise worthy actions during his shaheedi have never been questioned by anyone, it is accepted across the board that Banda redeemed himself during his shaheedi.... it is not an issue here.... the issue is whether there was a fall from grace prior to shaheedi
-
Time to reclaim our true Nishaan Sahib ?
Mahakaal96 replied to jkvlondon's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
Budha Dal has Nishan Sahibs from the time of 6ve Patshah All Nihang singh chaunis have blue Nishan Sahib. The Nihang nishanchi Singhs all carry blue Nishan Sahibs. A farla dhari Nihang singh should always display a blue farla -
Her name was Holika and she was Prehladhs bhua (aunt) not his sister. Holika was Harnakash’s sister. She didn’t use this power to try & burn Prehladh, she had a special shawl that could withstand fire & thus allow the wearer to sit in fire etc & not be burnt or hurt.
-
Again, I reiterate my point, you have shown no actual sources that back up your view, all you have provided is 1 name yet continue to ask for even more sources & evidence from those who oppose your view. If this were an actual gyan sabha you would be laughed out the door by now. Untill you provide sources & evidence that back up your views & hold as much weight as the names & sources I have provided this discussion can not continue. Lets keep it factual & leave the emotional heartstring stuff like Gurmukh/manmukh stuff to one side for now...... but if you insist on going down that route & base your argument on how could someone ‘handpicked’ by mahraj fall from grace then the example given by Kira is appropriate. If 7ve Gurus own biological son Ram Rai can fall from grace then why not anyone else? Those who do not understand the complexity of hankar & ego wont be able to get their head around that. Besides, it is universally accepted that Banda redeemed himself during his shaheedi, so again, leave the emotional stuff to 1 side & let’s stick to the facts & please provide sources that your views are based on. Emotional blackmail, personal feelings & individual personality worship traits do not count in a genuine gyan sabha.
-
Mata Sundri Ji’s rehitnama from Giani Gian singh commentary was provided on previous thread. Sant Jarnail Singh katha link provided Rattan Singh Bhangu panth Prakash listed as source Kavi Santokh Singh Suraj Prakash listed History from Budha Dal oral tradition provided on this thread local history in Hazur Sahib can be sourced first hand You provide 1 name, DR Anurag Singh to dissprove the above mentioned sources then ask for more evidence?....... your having a laugh. The ball is firmly in your court to provide something other then someone’s name..... a name you are using to say that Mata Sundri Ji hukamnama is forged & that Sant Jarnail singh (Taksal), Rattan singh Bhangu (grandson of Mehtab Singh), Kavi Santokh singh, Giani Gian Singh, Budha Dal (puratan sampardai) Hazur Sahib (local history) were all duped & are wrong!!!
-
Read the post again. I also mentioned Mata Sundri Ji, Rattan Singh Bhangu, Giani Gian Singh & Budha Dal as supportive of Sant Ji’s view... they are all authorative figures. Simarily on the topic of Kirpan amrit.... Sant Ji has his views but there are sants who support the views of Budha Dal, Hazur Sahib & Bhai Chaupa Singh rehitnama.... learn how to weigh up actual evidence instead of indulging in personality worship & believing everything based on 1 viewpoint. Saints of the highest level have had disagreements before. I would name names & give examples but I don’t have that much time for you. now.... stick to the topic of the thread