Jump to content

Preeet

Members
  • Posts

    1,765
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by Preeet

  1. 40 minutes ago, chatanga said:

    This guy is going even deeper and deepr into his hole:

     

     

    Vaheguru ji ka khalsa
    Vaheguru ji ki fateh, ji

    The singh behind him... He looks very familiar. Is he the nirvair leader person? Apologies if he isn't. Vaheguru ji ka khalsa vaheguru ji ki fateh

  2. 2 hours ago, ms514 said:

    VAHEGURU JI KA KHALSA, VAHEGURU JI KI FATEH

    Taksal Rehas Sahib, typically is referred to as complete - Sampooran.  However, it would be worthy to note that Hazoori Rehas Sahib, Nihang Rehras Sahib and Nanaksar Rehras Sahib is longer.  Would they then consider the Taksali Rehras Sahib as not Sampooran?

    Let's not get into these discussions on whose Nitnem is longer or complete:  Let's actually do the Nitnem, follow it and make it a part of life.  More Gurbani is always good and there is nothing stopping Sikhs from doing more - the Rehat defines the minimum - we should try to go above the minimum.

    vaheguru ji ka khalsa
    vaheguru ji ki fateh, ji

    Which one is the longest out of those three? & which one did sri guru sahib ji instruct us to recite during sandhya?? Dhhanyavad vaheguru ji ka khalsa vaheguru ji ki fateh

  3. Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    What an odd situation.. .. But I remember this post (not my post) from a while back, I don't know if it's true but it says:

    A Sikh of mine should not have (physical) relations with a Turkni. If one has (such) sex even on a single occasion, he will become a Muslim at that very instant. The man who adopts the Hindu faith should be wary of Turknis, remaining aloof from them. That man who regrets having sexual relationships with a woman that was not his own and performs some penance for his sin, (15) the Guru will be benevolent towards that Sikh, and he will be pardoned for his sin. The Sikh who enjoys a Turkni will never be forgiven. (16) That person will become a thorough Muslim. If someone has previously had physical relationships with a Turkni in ignorance, and later becomes a Sikh, they will also be pardoned by the Guru. (17)

    Original post credit:

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh ji

  4. 5 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

    HEY DON'T FORCE ME TO USE BAD WORDS AGAINST YOU OK ! :@ (Yes I am shouting) 

    My post had nothing to do with me being different. Sikhs need to stop playing this bullsh*t "gay card". 

    Putting down the vulnerable section of society isn't going to help your cause one bit , NOT A SINGLE BIT ! 

    so keep that crap to yourself. I ain't interested. Go show your rage where its required, if you guys get time out from gurudwara fightings and fake display of wealth that is ! 

    Show your mardanagi where its required . Sikhs have the lowest birth rates in india of all communities .

    No wonder even your women know you're all a bunch of  clowns, and prefer to marry with saner options. 

    nvm lol

  5. 1 hour ago, Jacfsing2 said:

    If I ever went to a church for example sake, I know there are some things I will never be allowed to do as a Non-Christian; one is take communion, and I assume they'd be respectful enough to tell me to leave, but when it comes to our faith we are constantly pressured to be accommodating. I as a Non-Brahmin, Non-Hindu can't go to Jaganath Puri, but still their rules are respected, only when it comes to us preaching, we get disrespect, is there any logical reason why?

     

    vaheguru ji ka khalsa
    vaheguru ji ki fateh, ji

    Where did you get the idea that you, as a Sikh cannot go to that Jagannath Puri temple. Sikhs can go there without being stopped, the only people that I thought were stopped were non ethnic Indians or those who are of abrahamic faiths..! I have never heard of any mandirs say that Sikhs cant come. bhull chuk maaf kijye vaheguru ji ka khalsa vaheguru ji ki fateh

  6. 2 hours ago, Siddhartha said:

    Preetji

    Satshriakal

    Thank you for your kind words that are so true to the essence of your belief. I too have used and still use this old adage of silent majority and vocal minority. But this is now doing irreparable damage as is evident from the Youtube video you watched. The hate has even engulfed the sense of social etiquette/maryada that the 2 parties couldn't even control their hatred in front of a camera. The silent majority should now become vocal and work towards the hope of slowly shrinking that vocal minority. Just imagine how a generation brought up on hate would bring up their progeny. I can't even imagine how much hatred a Sikh child would have for my child if the father of that Sikh child hates hindus. 

    At the same time it's a personal choice/tolerance/stand if one engages in inoccuous banter which again should be within the confines of social etiquette/maryaada. Moreover the key to humour is self-deprecation and it's golden rule is that if you give it, you need to have the maturity to take it too. And I engage in such banter with my very best Sikh friend, who was the one sitting next to me in the gurudwara that day and held my hand when I wanted to stand up in midst of that speech. I have him to thank for keeping me in confines of the etiquette/maryaada that day.

    Thank you

    Siddharth

    vaheguru ji ka khalsa
    vaheguru ji Ki fateh, ji

    Sat Sri Akal, ji! I understand what you're saying, but it would be hard to explain that to them because they have already made up their minds.. I think people should just be told once, after that just let them be since they will accumulate karmas, and justice will be served. They say Kalyug is going to get worse anyways ;( Personally speaking, I can't do much about it, so I practice bhakti to receive shanti for the mind + body and inspire others to practice pavitr karmas too if they ask me for help. Satya, Swachhta, Bhakti, & Daya are neccesary. Vaheguru ji ka khalsa vaheguru ji ki Fateh

  7. 2 hours ago, sitokaur said:

    singhbj,

    cancer is Vahiguroo given, and death too, but for a Gurmukh as Bhai Jagraj Singh Jio, he was no longer living since he replied to musalman at one street parchar,"to be singing Vahiguroo praise amongst holy is ultimate happiness!  Why would there be need for any women etc kurr!"

    So cancer and death did not kill Bhai Jagraj Singh Jio, because he knew how to live_/\_

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    Kaur ji, did he really say 'why would there be need for any woman'?? Do you have the link to the video so I can watch it please? vaheguru ji ka khalsa vaheguru ji ki fateh

  8. 1 minute ago, Jacfsing2 said:

    This website has many sister websites, with the leader or parent of the entire coalition being eternal guru, on that site they discuss they coming of Guruship of Dassan Das. And among Hassan Das's teaching directly, he claims himself to not only be the "modern Guru", he actually was formerly a Sikh, (in fact all of these sites related to him, used to be Sikh sites, and in some forgotten archives that are lost, you can find some Gurmat material).

    Vaheguru ji ka khalsa
    Vaheguru ji ki fateh, ji

    Hmm, interesting. I was reading a page of the site and one of the '(negative) incidents' that was written there happened to my pua ji as well, but when my pua ji was blessed with amrit ji then that negative incident stopped, and her life got better.. I must admit that that site has got me wondering something. vaheguru ji ka khalsa vaheguru ji ki fateh

  9. 5 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

    I won't link the site, but it's a generic 'sikh', (kind of, actually not really, just Sikh in name), site. They follow someone who's pen name is Dassan Das. 

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    What part of that site is not really sikh according to you, singh ji? I'm not really familiar with the site myself. Vaheguru ji ka khalsa Vaheguru ji ki fateh

  10. 12 hours ago, Guest Jagsaw_Singh said:

    That "someone" who gifted you the perfume also contains alcohol. So do you. All human bodies naturally produce alcohol every day. So, given that you're not going to drink that "someone" or drink yourself the only question that remains is this: Are you planning on drinking that perfume or cooking a dish with it ?

    10 hours ago, S1ngh said:

    My opinion would be to keep spiritual place as a simple place and also that to be free from chemicals such as scents, perfume sprays etc. 

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji ki Fateh, ji

    Thank you both for answering! I think I'd smell like body odor if I don't use it :rofl So I shouldn't throw out the perfume? Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh

  11. 18 minutes ago, SoulSingh said:

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖ਼ਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫ਼ਤਹਿ 

    Well, if you live in the west, there is probably a chance you've used alcohol related products to clean. Since we aren't using these products to get drunk, I don't see why we would have to retake Amrit. Guru sahib said "jith pethay matt door hoye" peethay being of course injesting it. And loosing "maat" is the real reason we avoid it anyways ji. 

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖ਼ਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫ਼ਤਹਿ 

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    Thank you for replying Singh ji! Hmm, I see. Would it be inappropriate if I used it before going to a dharmic jaga such as a gurdwara ji? Since I always go everyday while running errands. vaheguru ji ka khalsa vaheguru ji ki fateh 

  12. Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    Someone gifted me really expensive perfume, and I just read that it contains 'alcohol denat'.. Just to double check, I cannot use this perfume as an amritdhari? I used the perfume (hours before I accidentally read the ingredients) with my friend who gifted it to try it ;( Should I throw it out, do I need to retake amritji? Dhanyavad vaheguru ji ka khalsa vaheguru ji Ki fateh

  13. On 8/20/2017 at 6:57 AM, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

    He doesn't live in india . He lives in australia . I saw him and his 4 yr old son in one photo , standing next to each other in suits , with the caption "Like father , like son" . HOw ironic one of them is sardar and other is monah. 

    I asked him on message , why he's doing this . He said he's not sikh . When I asked then why do you wear turban, he said turban is not sole ownership of sikhs, even muslims or others wear it . But he's def was a sikh , and of punjabi descent, although cut short my argument by saying he's not a sikh in the first place.

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    Not all sardars are Sikh! From my mom's side, her grandfather was a devout punjabi shaivite and he was a sardar who kept kesh and wore a pagh. Even today if you visit popular tiriths you will see sadhus with uncut kesh and paghs. If someone denies being a sikh, then that especially means they are not sikhs, it answers the question!! & don't you cut your dhari as well (according to your old posts)? Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh

  14. 52 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

    By saying the above she is trying to obscure the clear difference between Sikhs and Hindus.  If a person wants to worship the Gurus then worship the Gurus as they taught.  Instead these Hindus are worshipping in their manmat way.  Saying Vaheguru before an idol as a form of worship is no different for when Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji tells Hindus not to worship idols by saying a devi or devta name.  Vaheguru description and form of worship is given in Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji.  If Hindus want to worship by saying Vaheguru then follow Gurbani instructions.  Gurbani uses the name shiva to describe an attribute of Vaheguru.  But Hindus are worshipping Shiva the devta who came down went against Vaheguru Hukam and died.  By saying vaheguru before a shivling the Hindus are calling shiva thee Vaheguru.  They are being clever by taking gullible people to worship a shivling of Shiva.  

    Sikhs do not wear Hindu threads.  These threads have some sort of manmat behind them.  This poster does not clearly say she objects to Sikhs wearing these threads because she thinks according to Gurmat wearing a thread is right.  Now in this topic she is going on about how she does not tell others what to do.  She is a bold face liar because anyone can see her objections to Sikhs eating meat on a different topic.  Also she is trying to give merit to wearing threads by saying a lot of people do it.  Again another Hindu fable to get others to follow them to reincarnation.  Sikhs will always have a problem with the Hindu thread because it creates some to be more deserving of Gods worship because they were born in a certain family than another who was born to a so called lower family lineage.  Some threads are worn to keep away evil spirits which is also against the Sikhs teaching.  

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    1stly, I see a clear difference between amritdharis and hindus because our guru sahib jis have denied certain hindu practices (and if it ever felt like I have said there is no difference in the past then I am sorry for my mistake). 2ndly I agree with sikhs not wearing hindu threads. What I was saying in my post was that I have no objection with strangers in real life because who am I to advise a stranger since I don't know anything about them. Hindu threads are not gurmat.. practices that our guru sahib jis have not taken part of is not seen as part of sikhi to me. Sorry for the misunderstanding Singh ji.. There are a lot of things I've changed my mind on due to the cycle of learning. Another reason why I choose to not advise people to practice anything other than patth.  bhull chuk maaf kijye Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh

  15. 12 hours ago, Kira said:

    Please stop lying through your teeth. You're posting arths of people who aren't Brahmgyanis so you're taking the sins as well according to you. Hilarious. Prachar includes anything regarding sikhi. Something you seem to do all the time. Why are you telling me to calm down? I'm not angry nor am I enraged. Amused is a better word.  You don't do Nindya of those who don't understand but you'll do nindya of those who do. Telling me to do Paath when you come here to spread more anti-Gurmat filth is hilarious.

     

    can you answer my question then? Forget everything else. Is tying threads Gurmat or not. Great work on avoiding the question, so cowardly. Btw I'll make this simple for you, it's a yes no answer. No elaberote explanation.

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    I don't do any parchar of Sikhi lol. ;(? I don't explain the religion of Sikhism to anyone online, if anything I just encourage already believers who ask questions to do more paath to find the answers. I don't go up to a crowd who hasn't asked anything and start explaining Sikhi lol. Besides, I was talking to the OP here, and you decided to start an argument as usual. Who says I said that you understand those arrtths as well, I won't speak for anyone else's understanding. I'm not even doing any slander of you either, and if you feel as if I did then I'm sorry. Theres nothing wrong with me telling you to do more patth, since I assume you enjoy that better than talking to me, so go on and practice that. Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh

  16. 12 minutes ago, Kira said:

    I'm asking you a direct question then to cut through the nonsense. Do you consider tying threads anti-Gurmat or not?

    the word prachar literally implies posting anything on a public speaking stage about Sikhi. The word isn't exclusive to arths, which is hilarious as you constantly spam post arths from faulty translations and attempt to pass them off as fact. How hypocritical that now you're retracting and changing your statement after being caught with your pants down. Sorry but you throw arths from Brahmgyanis out the window when they don't agree with you anyways, now you're attempting to change the meaning of an actual word to cover up your own virtue signalling. Disgusting.

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    Look, when I was talking about parchar before it was about artths, not about everything. & anyways, those were not my artths either, so you can calm down, Singh ji. If something doesn't make sense to me then that only applies to me. I never said those were false or true, so please calm down. & if complex artths don't make sense to me, everyone is still free to understand them. I don't call them true or false. I'm not like some who forces strangers to agree just because it currently made sense to them. Besides, understanding and brahmgyan happens with gurprasad, so stop arguing and do some patth if you want blessings. You don't have to be concerned for my thoughts, since I don't force people to agree with me anyways, nor do I do nindya of those who don't understand. Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh

  17. 57 minutes ago, Kira said:

    You're posting on an public forum to the world to see. That is Prachar, If you don't want people to do it then keep quiet and don't post. Follow your own advice. Anything I type here is prachar, we're all prachariks as others can see and read the posts, and use it to take away the dos and don'ts. They can see yours and take it to mean its perfectly fine. But im sure that wasn't your intention (!)

     

    But it's great to see the fact that people claim to be Sikhs and do anti-gurmat things doesn't really concern you. 

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    Singh ji, Its not my job to stop strangers from making their own decisions that don't effect my bhagti! When I mentioned parchar before, it was regarding people who give arths of gurbani ji, not really about just any talk. I did not give arths of gurbani ji here, and so I felt it was okay for me to write my thoughts. & you're right, that wasn't my intention. Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh

  18. 1 hour ago, Kira said:

    Yes so because they do it, that means its right. Majority of Sikhs drink so lets all start doing that. Just open up and say it. As long as your dear old Hindu friends do it, you'll be happy to call it Sikhi. But god forbid if a Muslim or a Christian put his traditions forward, you would have a spaz attack and scream at how it's blasphemy.

    Guru Nanak Dev Ji refused to wear the thread, Any true Gursikh wouldn't wear it. No true Sikh ever did wear it. Bhai Chuapa Singh Ji's rehitnama forbids it, So does Bhai Daya Singh Ji's Rehitnama, Gurbani says again and again about how its futile. 

    If you have any shred of respect for them then you'd hold the same opinion. 

     

    Also why are you doing Prachar now, you said only Brahmgyanis should be allowed to do it as its too dangerous for the rest of us. Posting stuff here where people can see is Prachar, so I take it you think you're a brahmgyani now?

     

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    This is no parchar from me lol. I never told people to do any of this. Even I don't do that. I was just saying that it isn't an uncommon dharmic thing to witness, and that who am I to stop people from doing things in their personal lives (as long as they're hurting no one), thus I have no objection. Kinda like how I don't agree with the consumption of meat, but I'm not going up to people who do jhatka to fight with them. Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh

  19. Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    There is a large population of Hindus who worship our Guru jis as well as their own Gods. Even when I went to mandirs before outside of India, there would be pictures of Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji being worshiped along with Gods. Even some of sangat in the temple would say vaheguru vaheguru in front of the shivling while pouring milk rather than om namah shivaya. & you should remember the traditional religion of punjabis before sikhism and islam was that religion. I have a feeling that you haven't been to Punjab recently. There are a lot of people who look sikh while wearing threads and rings/tilaks (I have no objection to them) etc. Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh

  20. Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    When someone wants to use contraception, they adding to their kaam desires because the motive is sexual orgasms.. The goal for Sikhs should be to decrease the 5 dukhs (such as kaam) within their life (and add bhakti), not to encourage them with contraception. These are just my thoughts on this. When something adds to the 5 dukhs, it should be avoided if the consequences are not desired..! bhull chuk maaf kijye Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh

  21. 18 minutes ago, Singh1989 said:

    Preeet Ji! Glad you posted this as I was wondering, does this shabad goes to Christian, Hindu and Muslim? (Non - Sikhs) or just Sikh sects? (Nihang, Taksal, normal Sikh) etc?

    Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
    Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

    Sat Sri Akal Singh ji! I think gurbani ji lines are applied to all humans. I think that trying to justify being 'free from paaps' because of a belief is not possible, these laws are applied to everyone equally. Just because someone may not believe in this dharma does not change the truth of sikhism being true and gurbani being applied to all.. (I am talking about all paaps in general). bhull chuk maafkijye Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use