Jump to content

jkvlondon

Members
  • Posts

    10,115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    262

Posts posted by jkvlondon

  1. 42 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

    I don’t think Amrit was given easily back then, it’s easier for people to take Amrit now, so if it was harder back then, and our population is around 10% of Sikhs at max, it’s likely back then it was closer to 5%. Udasis and Nirmalas were also more prominent back then.

    Bhai Sahib all manjis were authorised to administer charan pahul to new sikhs and later other gursewaks/gurparcharaks including nihang dals administered pahul... I think that the British interference has created the wrong impression , what made amrit sanchar difficult was loss of gurdwara control and hunting down of akalis and antisikh laws by British .

  2. 52 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

    By definition, can a Gurdwara be without a Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji ?

    yes you can have a gurdwara without Guru Granth Sahib ji as existed before where Shastar were placeholder for Guruji/Akal Purakh in Darbar , but back then Gursikhs were super educated in dharam granths and many had Gurbani Kant including whole of Guru Granth Sahib . So Guru Panth were the literal bodies in which Guru ji Resided

  3. 1 hour ago, kcmidlands said:

    I agree in part, the problem is you drive the ideology of people like this underground and then it can't be tracked as easily which is a dangerous situation, she's taken advantage of a volatile situation for her own personal gain, she's trying to get her foot into politics but has unfortunately decided to go right wing on it and does nothing but embarrass herself all the time.

     

    look there are millions of these evilhearted people but they only become dangerous when they inflame by lying and inciting on mass media channel , just think if Amitabh wasn't able to spew hate on doordarshan wouldn't it have made ordinary folks less sympathetic to the genocidal gangs ? less likely to turn around and tell ud to forget it ?

  4. 1 hour ago, GurjantGnostic said:

    Quoting some misconceptions there. 

    The, they would have done it if they could argument is a white supremacist one and really flimsy bro. Do better. 

     

    exactly the pisspoor GB has always stolen its riches from other nations from the time of elizabeth I 's privateers  , until now . if Bengal's rulers didn't fawn and help East India Company India would never have fallen so easily , the problem has alays been individual's greed for power and riches over the good of the people. Indians are accursed with lack of spine in the presence of money and perceived power, just look at current India and how much state owned industries and land has been handed over to a handful of guju cheats and conmen

  5. 11 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

    That's true. Too many of our religious Sikh people aren't street smart sadly to be able to assist in combating these issues.

    too many are affected by inflicted victorian moralilty (i,e. hypocritical prudishiness) instead of being open and straightforward as Dasam Granth is about such things.

    besides having non married relationships and families leads to erosion of stability of society and lack of legal rights because of various loopholes introduced on the sly by governments , where children can be deported/put in care , family assets can be grabbed on death of partners, denial of admittance to hospitals due lack of marriage certificate etc etc

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use