Jump to content

superkaur

Members
  • Posts

    446
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by superkaur

  1. Yes most probably. German, denmark, austria and belgium have a sizable salafi convert community. They had a sharia4germany group sharia4belguim group with the likes of anjem choudary who had islam4uk and islam4india group before they were banned just before the syria war started. These alleged attackers could also be north african arabs they tend to be quite light skinned compared to other muslims.
  2. After the massacre the residents of the village pointed the police to Mohammad Yakub Magray as one of the suspects.[11] In 2010, the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) associate David Headley(a U.S. citizen who changed his name from Daood Gilani in 2006), who was arrested in connection with the 2008 Mumbai attacks, reportedly confessed to the National Investigation Agency that the LeT carried out the Chittisinghpura massacre.[15] He is said to have identified an LeT militant named Muzzamil as part of the group which carried out the killings apparently to create communal tension just before Clinton’s visit.[16] sources: [11] http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl1707/17070340.htm The massacre at Chattisinghpora [15] http://www.hindustantimes.com/Lashkar-behind-Sikh-massacre-in-Kashmir-in-2000-says-Headley/Article1-617459.aspx Lashkar behind Sikh massacre in Kashmir in 2000, says Headley [16]http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101026/j&k.htm#2 Chittisinghpura Massacre: Obama’s proposed visit makes survivors recall tragedy And we all know how islamic jihadi salafi terrorists operate they first attack when the non-muslim community carries out revenge attacks they cry how the non-muslim community is killing them they ask the mainstream muslims to help them attack the non-muslim community. WAKE UP!!! yes the indian army is no angel and kills minorities and is a terrorist organisation in my eyes.... we do not have any love for indian army it has a disgusting genocidal past especially for their crimes against Sikhs. However they aren't the only one that carries out these kinda killings. Salafi muslim jihadis are all too happy to attack you and your family because you are not a sunni muslim of their brand of islam. If you want to live in cloud coco land and live in ignorance thats your choice but the salafi muslim wild dog has you as the lamb in in the green fields in his sights
  3. Not suprised either. Its more of a huge blow to pakistani nationalists than it is to the small sikh community there. Yes they lost a very visible leader for their interests but that guy was a big lover of pakistan and a pakistani patriot. The people who killed him as most probably islamist salafis who want pakistan either destoryed or have it ruled under sharia law. Sikhs once ruled most of the land that tribal land along with pakistani occupied punjab. And now generations after them are suffering under the hands of non-sikh regimes. A lesson and warning from history.
  4. I believe Sikhs do not undertand the salafist mindset. The salafis even declare other muslims as kafirs and non-muslims because of small issues. They are very intolerant and backwards. Dawah man the muslim <banned word filter activated> from youtube is from the salafi sect. Sikhs have had plenty of warning signs that salafis dont care how peaceful how co-existing how humanterian you are. In there eyes all non-salafi sunni muslims are going to hellfire all are enemies of allah and need to be attacked. Most salafi muslims are not hell bent on killing people but they are indoctrinated with a violent hate for all things non-muslims. These salafi teens in germany who attacked the gurdwara probably thought they are hindus or indians in general so a legitimate target in their evil islamic ideological sectarian beliefs. Back in the 80s and 90s when these muslims tried to attack Sikh youths in colleges and universities the organisations that the muslim thugs belonged too were salafi ideologically ie hizb-ut-tahir and al-mahajouroun. The militant Sikhs formed gangs called shere punjab amoung others they would literally have street battles in the street with these salafi muslims the mistake was to drag all muslims in the mud with these salafi's. At the time Sikhs were not educated they thought all muslims were the enemy of Sikhs but the truth is most muslims do maybe dislike non-muslims but they are not as fundamental in their dislike as salafi muslims do. We need to study the salafi's and target their people with parchar especially their women. Also physically Sikh youths need to man up and learn to street fight. In kashmir 2000 march..... 40 of our sikh brothers were martyred by militants some people claimed it was indian army. The indian army did not have a credible motive to attack Sikhs. But the salafi muslims did as they do not care for innocent civilian life of non-muslims and wanted world attention when president bill clinton was there to give maximum publicity for their jihad. 6 non-muslim women were murdered in 2003 for not wearing the veils. The salafi's do not take non-muslims as allies. Other kashmir muslim separatists do not have this fundamentalist attitude they fighting for kashmiriyat a free kashmir the salafi's fight for islamiyat... that is islamic rule. In kenya 2014 2 Sikhs (grandmother and her grandson) amoung many others were murdered in westgate shopping centre by al sahaba salafi muslim somalians because they victims werent muslims. 2016 the essen germany gurdwara attack by salafi muslim teens. You guys do the math and educate your fellow Sikhs who the enemy is. Knowledge is power.
  5. Pakistani Sikh legislator Sardar Soran Singh killed in attack: TV HT Correspondent, Hindustan Times, New Delhi Updated: Apr 22, 2016 21:06 IST Sardar Soran Singh Sardar Soran Singh, a leading Sikh activist and a member of the assembly of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province, was shot dead by unidentified attackers in northwest Pakistan on Friday, according to media reports. Singh, who was a special assistant on minorities to the provincial chief minister, was attacked outside his home in Pir Baba area of Buner district, the media reports said. There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack. Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is home to a sizeable Sikh population. Singh was a member of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, the party led by cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan. Sikhs in Pakistans northwest have been targeted in the past by militant groups, including the Taliban. Several Sikhs have been kidnapped for ransom.
  6. Well if these salafi muslim terrorist teen boys did allegedly carry out the attack then Sikhs worldwide need to think very careful what their response should be. Sleeping and ignoring physical attacks on our Guru's house and on our people is not an option and can not be tolerated. At the very least the families of these salafi boys need to speak out along with salafi groups in germany. Thats If they are not complicit in the attack on the Sikh community in germany. If they don't condem or remain silent then we have identified the enemy.
  7. Ok thread has taken a tangent don't know why you decide to bring this strange unrelated article up. But I don't anything wrong with her article shes just giving reasons why Sikhs keep uncut hair. She doesn't not say if she keeps it or not she is asking why then listing the reasons/rationale of people along with sources as references. I think its well written article.
  8. Yes this is what I meant. But also we have gotten shy about self defense and our martial background, we see fights between a few cowardly UK and American Sikhs in guru's house but they wont fight non-sikhs, they wouldnt dare because they are giddards. That is the state of affairs we need to wake up to. BTW I don't know which article you on about? can you paste the link.
  9. I was browsing their website today and noticed their online streaming isn't working. I haven't seen their channel for months so maybe they stopped operating altogether?
  10. Well listening to the words and examples of our Guru's and then actioning them. For a start we need Gurdwara sewadars who should be monitoring Guru's house of any inappropriate beadhi behavior or non-sikh person trying to harm the sangat. And as per Sikh traditions and history weapons/force should be used against the aggressor(s). Back in the 80s/90s in the west if this kinda thing happened the aggressor would be caught and given a good beating that will make him remember for the rest of his life not to mess with Sikhs. It seems the Sikhs in the west of today are very soft very forgiving and very very very lazy. And this lazyness and lack of unity and lack self defence is not taught in Sikhism its something foreign. The golden rule Sikhs should follow is be kind and gentle to fellow Sikhs who may transgress you but be harsh and fierce to the non-sikh aggressor who physically harms you and your people. Nowadays its the opposite, it seems the Sikhs instead of looking out for the best interests of each other are divided and allowing the non-sikh enemy who wants to kill you get away scott free. Outsiders like deranged neo-nazi white terrorists do not care if you are not harming them because their ideology is about hating your non-white race or skin colour. We can talk all we want to non-sikhs who we are and that we are a peaceful humanterian religion but someone evil people just don't care they hate us because we are different to them (perhaps race, religion, etc) and they will try to attack us unless they are given reasons to attack us is not a good idea.
  11. I'm not aware if he gets ad revenue at the moment or not but as a youtube partner the ability and potential is there and his channel gets alot of views and subscribers these days. There is nothing wrong with making money from youtube and putting it back into basics of sikhi parchar. I'm not saying he isn't doing a good thing or he should stop what he is doing. I'm just saying he should concentrate a bit more on teaching Sikhi to the youths like he used to do in his earlier videos which I found really interesting rather than these confronting videos in hyde park with the brainwased dawahist muslims its not good viewing for anyone who is trying to learn the basics its just 2 blokes or 5 having an argument and its boring. There is no polite discussion there is just alot of hype and shouting going on trying to point score against each other. I would say the best approach of basics of Sikhi from my point of view is when the actual basics are told with subtitles. All these katha's in punjabi and the odd subtitle are not interesting to the youths. They need to work on their delivery and making videos interesting visually. Theres hundreds of guys doing kathas on youtube but the only ones interested in watchin are the dozen hardcore sikhs.
  12. Hardly no media coverage because of racist white privilege in mainstream western media. To counter this all news editors who didnt cover this story should be found out and name and shamed publicly on social media. Then we will ahve change and progress in equality of coverage and treating these incidents as terrorism. And my hunch on motives is that it was a race hate white german neo-nazi terrorist who hates muslims and assumed sikhs are muslims but didnt mind if they werent muslims because they were non-white it%2
  13. Ever noticed that Jagraj's highest youtube views, comments and subscribers come when he talks to muslims in his his videos. He should be targeting the lost generation sheeps who are punjabi by name or sikh heritage but are actually atheists by lifestyle because maybe they got in with the wrong crowd growing up or never got taught sikhi the right way or at all at home. All these muslim confronting videos are basically a marketting ploy to get more ad revenue. Since muslims outnumber Sikhs demographically they would be more interested in watching and hence contributing to the viewing figures. Whereas for a muslim looking for views to go for sikh topics would be a non-starter because there is not much interest there from muslims. It would make more sense for muslim to discuss hindu issues because there are 1 billion hindus in the world and hence more viewers. Dawahman aka dawah kid also uses this tactic but he goes after famous people or strange or intimate topics that disgust and shock people so that he knows more people will watch and in return he will get more money from number of ads clicked.
  14. Well its a wake up call for sleeping Sikh nation to get militarily strong again. I wonder which deranged group or community wants the wrath of the Sikh nation on them http://sputniknews.com/europe/20160416/1038139034/breaking-three-injured-after-bomb-attack-sikh-wedding-ceremony-essen.html
  15. Here's further proof of what Canadian intelligence agents found in 1980s with regards to Indian Intelligence agents were up to. Lets remember the RAW Indian terrorist agency was setup in 1960s by the then prime minister shastri to target the Sikh community who were seeking political autonomy for Sikhs in the punjab regions north india (pepsu). India at that time had many states within that were still NOT part of the union and were still backed by independent kings and colonial masters such as portugal. The Sikh leadership were not seeking outright independence that demand came later on in 1980s especially after operation blue star.
  16. Yup it is absurd to even suggest a link between so called "Sikh militants" and ISIS. It's madness for Hindians to even have suggested this. But it confirms to intelligent and awake Sikhs the intentions the Indian govt & certain sections of the Indian media have towards Sikhs globally and especially targeting Canadian Sikhs Problem is all 3 Sikh media channels in the UK are not covering covert and overt Indian maligning of Sikhs in western nations. They have not touched on indian terrorist operations that operatives carried out in 1980-90s in UK, USA and canada. And until our people are unaware of the defamation game the hindustani's are playing then people will just sleep in ignorance until <banned word filter activated> hits the fan and then they wonder whats going on. The indian terrorist Avjit doval was part of the RAW when they targeted Sikhs in punjab and else where. This guy is now an advisor to prime minister modi. We must ask ourselves why are they maligning Canadian sikhs especially? Why try to link ISIS which is terrorist sunni jihadi anti anything non-islamic and does not make alliances with non-muslims..... I believe its because the current canadian prime minister and administration is very pro Sikh he has a party that has 3 Sikhs in parliament. BJP has none. Canadian govt and intelligence agencies know Indian RAW operatives carried out the Air india incident in 1985. And they are very wary of letting Indians do that again and have even banned former punjab police officers and army officers from entry to canada due to their human rights abuses and state terrorism against Sikhs. So the best way to counter hindustani mud slinging against the Sikh globally community is to counter it in the mainstream and sikh media circles. Failure to speak out and mud sling on racist hindustani's and terrorist indian govt is giving them a free ride to attack your religion and your family.
  17. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3535635/Are-Kate-William-targeted-ISIS-Delhi-Police-hunt-female-jihadi-suspected-travelling-Indian-capital-launch-attacks-Royal-tour.html
  18. This sly brahmin hindustani extremnist posing as an atheist is disrespecting our religion and symbols on youtube. Everyone report this channel also inform Sikh organisations so that we can get the police and other legal authorities on to him. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaCuzO6GwsOlmLXftNC2m_A
  19. Thats a really good analysis, If only more people in power analysed the true nature of islam's political setup and fought tooth and nail against it just as much they fought against the nazi's ideology. Islam is a trojan horse first it came into the lands as something strange but peaceful, then it started to groom the weak (ie vulnerable loveless girls and low iQ men and stockholm syndrome women). Then once its population had grown enough they started to demand undeserved special privileges and rights. Once they were granted and they had almost 40% population over a nation their mentally insane criminal members started to violently attack the peaceful unsuspecting non-muslim host community. The host community fought back but were held back by the liberalists and far left trying to aid the islamists unwittingly. The islamists used extreme violence and destroy the government and install their own fascist totalitarian islamist leaders and spread out their black shirt troops in every town and city in the land enforcing their sharia mullahbad dictates. And hey presto the once playful peaceful joyful progressive non-muslim nation has been transformed to a despotic islamic hellhole with limited rights for women and non-muslim communities.
  20. Yup it seems that way from all the muslim countries we can see in the world today very few or none that embrace multiculturalism or multi-religious setup where the other religions are given equality. Islamic authorities assert themselves very arrogantly and clearly that islam is the dominant religion and to try and convert muslims to other faiths wont be tolerated however non-muslims are fair game for abuse, haraessment, attacks, murders, rapes, discrimination or conversions.
  21. The 2 most destructive forces on earth currently are1) Atheist capitalists 2) Islamists Both must be opposed if we want a peaceful and just world. Islamists agenda is to islamifiy whole nations to live under their backward religion and political theology. Atheist capitalists want to earn profit for the rich 1% while the 99% poor workers or out of work do not have the same living standards. Also they fund illegal wars killing innocents acrosss the world, they also fund saudi arabia and arab states who they control who in turn control the islamists. If you just concentrate on the atheist capitalists as you seem to be doing you are neglecting the emerging threat of islamists. They have a symbiotic relationship with the atheist capitalists both feed of each other and both need each other in order to thrive.
  22. Further more I would say its unjust to attack muslims just for being muslims. The biggest victims of Islam are muslims themselves. The countless dead muslims in recent wars are from the hands of other criminal muslim jihadi's who have judged those who oppose them to have become aspostes and religiously justified to be killed.
  23. Dont listen to the far left they will label anything as racist. Bottom line is you cant be race-ist against a religion. Religion is a religion its ideology its belief and can be changed, people can convert. Race is a race something you cant change, your born into it you have no choice to change your skin colour or racial ethnic group. So no being anti-islam is not racist it can be called religionist or bigoted. And Islam teaches its followers to be religionist against non-muslims they are 1.6 billion in number they are majority in many area's they have no right to shout racist or religionist against anyone because they are the oppressor they are the abuser in a position of power against other religious minorities.
  24. Ok whats your views on islam and with utterances in quran and hadiths that make it clear that non-muslims are going to hellfire, allah hates disbelievers, if you leave islam you will get killed in sharia ruled state, a non-muslim must be made to feel inferiour to a muslim, islam must dominate other religions because its the true religion. All that is true of islam and I can give you the verses from hadiths and quranic ayats to back it up so what your views of fascism of Islam? Is it not a fascist ideology?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use