Meme

Did anyone here know know him? Did you ever care to think that this sikh kid might be holding all tauntings for weeks or months or years and finally lashed it while defending himself?? With all of you pretending or posting your opinions, have your kid go thru the bullying and you will know how hard your life will be.

Dont turn this topic into fight against other members. Talk about tooic logically without attacking or proving other wrong.

United we stand with those who dont attack our scriptures and those who dont make mockery of naam simran. Just for sake of unity, it is not right to stand together with those who attacks gurbani directly in open. Second of all, bhai Gurbaksh Singh khalsa already gave a strong jawab to these missonaries during his first morcha last year and that is the main reason why such gur nindaks didnt go see him at all, far from supporting him. Are they really that thick head to highlight their flawed calendar when a G khalsa health is in grave danger and he stopped drinking water. These calendar thugs are there ok behalf of someone to steal the light away from bukh hadtaal of bhai sahib.

^

Sponsored by shaadi.com

SIKHVOICE YOUTUBE CHANNEL ---->

last year news was that there is a ban on TV even duty free shops one. Please check.

GROSS INJUSTICE. WSO SHOULD HAVE CONTACTED THEM BY NOW AS TIMING IS CRITICAL IN SUCH CASES ! CALL THEM (WSO) IF NOT THEN CALL OTHER SIKH ORGANIZATIONS.

What kind of electronic equipments? ipad or laptop is ok but if they are planning to bring tv or big then not recommended. Indian Custom officers are cruel.

http://www.sikhnet.com 350K 350K 350K 350K 350K 350K 350K 350K

Aah dekh lo hun... Taken less than week ago

Great seva ! Panditrao Dharennavar

Again... What do you think?

What do you think?

Rape case. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN GURBAKSH SINGH KHALSA REASONS FOR JUDGMENT PLANTIFF OF THE HONOURABLE AND : TARANJIT KAUR BHULLAR, HARINDER SINGH BHULLAR, GURNHAM SINGH BAJWA and KAHAR SINGH PANNU DEFENDANTS Counsel for the Plaintiff : Douglas S. Cunliffe; Counsel for the Defendants : Christopher M. Considine; Place and Dates of Trial : Victoria, B.C. September 3-6, 9-12 and November 7, 1991. Conclusion; I conclude therefore that the plaintiff has failed to prove his allegation of a wrongful accusation of sexual assault and find that in fact the sexual assault did take place. The plaintiff’s action is accordingly dismissed with costs. With respect to the counterclaim, I find that the defendants have proved their counterclaim and that the plaintiff in fact sexually assaulted the female defendant. The plaintiff-who, as a priest in a position of authority and influence, sexually assaulted a female parishioner in the tight-knit society of the Sikh community in Victoria-is guilty of an extremely serious offence. Damages; In this case punitive damages need be awarded to express society’s disapproval of the conduct of the plaintiff as a priest in authority and trust breaching that trust and sexually assaulting a parishioner. His attempting, after that, to manufacture evidence and shift the blame away from himself and his harassment of Mrs. Bhullar is despicable. I award the sum of $5,000.00 as punitive damages. Mrs. Bhullar will have her costs of the counterclaim and pre-judgment interest at the rate set by the Registrar from time to time. VANCOUVER, B.C. 24th February, 1992.

facebook status..

A regular, independent, non-jathabandi sikh who did something this big and all alone is the karamat of rab jeo..