Jump to content

MisterrSingh

Members
  • Posts

    7,295
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    225

Everything posted by MisterrSingh

  1. But those people don't have a voice, or at worst are viewed with a considerable amount of condescension and mistrust. Such people are abandoned and left muttering on the sidelines at the injustice of it all, which is where it's understood that they can't affect anything. This status-obsessed world we occupy seems to assume that if you haven't "made it" there must be some serious deficiencies in the individual, and therefore most of what such people have to offer is taken with a pinch of salt or, at worst, even disregarded just because it doesn't originate from a place of supposed authority. So how does that particular individual ever transfer their thoughts and philosophies to tangible action -- in a system that perhaps purposefully yet unobtrusively makes it very difficult for those who don't follow the narrative and those without "official endorsements" to succeed -- when they aren't afforded the grace to do so? You cannot participate and then win a game that is fixed. To even try and play is futile. So you either give up or you destroy the game, hoping there are enough like-minded individuals ready to flock to your cause to eliminate the idea of a disgruntled lone-wolf raging at an unjust world.
  2. I wish it was as simple as that. In an ideal world where both parties adhere to some form of honourable conduct even in the most inhospitable of climates, that good-natured exchange makes sense. But we know real life is a lot messier and illogical. Sometimes, good men are implicated in issues not of their making, etc. In a climate where the benefit of the doubt is more often than not awarded to the female voice in order to apparently re-address societal injustices centuries in the making, I don't feel justice and parity are always the winners in these cases.
  3. Difficult to disagree with any of that. But I'd add there are many ineffectual, weak, or downright foolish and ignorant men who have no business heading anything let alone the family unit. May God protect the wives and children of such men.
  4. She does it too eagerly and regularly for my liking, as if she relishes reminding us what we revere is just pages and ink to someone of her frame of mind. The tone is pointed and apparent to me, and I don't like it. If she's on this forum, she abides by the way we do things. I don't like the feint whiff of hostility lurking behind the manner in which she frames her questions.
  5. One t Define 'intelligent', lol. I'm know and am aware of many educated and erudite people, but I struggle to attribute the quality of wisdom and foresight to their cognition. The paradox of such a thing doesn't bode well, particularly when such people hold the reins to the fate of the majority. I can perhaps forgive genuine ignorance and inexperience, but self-interest and malice masquerading as benevolence is unforgivable.
  6. Do you see a future for people like us of certain values and frames of mind (across the races and cultures) in the UK and Europe, Dal? I'm surprised at the brazen besharmpunna on display at the moment. The man behind the curtain seems to no longer care that his presence has become known if you know what I mean.
  7. The Sumerians and later Egyptians worshipped a Durga-esque deity; a female Goddess of war. There was an Akkadian personality who was named Naram-Sin. He is frequently depicted with the head of a lion, etc. Read up on ancient cultures and the deities they worshipped, and you'll begin to realise why our Guru Sahibs were so dismissive of the so-called Gods. It affirms your belief in the bachchans of our Guru Sahibs instead of creating doubt.
  8. If you look at it from the perspective that Zeus = Jupiter = Indra = Horus = Thor, etc., then it makes sense. Ram and Sita weren't Gujarati, lmao.
  9. All this talk of Homos is getting Ajeet excited. Tone it down, fellers. ?
  10. The Great Deluge. The old Mesopotamian and Sumerian civilisations wrote about it extensively. Of course, Christianity later absorbed those events into its own flood mythology with the likes of Noah and his ark.
  11. It is, but in all seriousness there's constant adjustment about previously incontrovertible schools of thought in various scientific fields as new developments and issues emerge over time, so I wouldn't assume current scientific norms will remain unchanged for eternity. Who knows, perhaps there's wisdom and truth in the old ways that has yet to be fully understood by modern minds?
  12. The existence of dinosaurs throws a spanner in the works for many religious theories, lol.
  13. Stop stalking me, faggot. It's embarrassing for you.
  14. You've been told repeatedly to stop referring to Guru Granth Sahib as a "book" yet you continue to do so.
  15. Recent research has uncovered that dinosaurs were considerably feathered as opposed to the exclusively scaly / reptilian images previously assumed to be the norm. If there were such creatures in pre-historical times, it might explain the accounts / renditions of such creatures interacting with the Hindu pantheon.
  16. Never underestimate pathetic men who'll abandon their principles for a bit of attention and companionship. And thus the woman is rewarded and gratified despite her earlier indiscretions.
  17. And there's nothing wrong with it. To be fair, though, there have been a few notable women who managed great feats in the name of God.
  18. Every human act doesn't necessarily need a metaphorical religious or spiritual justification in order for it to make sense. Some things just are. You can search the scriptures for all manner of reasons to justify nearly anything you like, but that doesn't make it any more valid.
  19. I'm staying away from this thread. I'm learning stuff I don't want to know, lol. This is infuriating.
  20. They'll rename it Baba Gangu Ka Isthaan.
  21. I'm surprised the house is still standing. Our lot love reducing historical buildings to rubble.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use