Jump to content

MisterrSingh

Members
  • Posts

    7,295
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    225

Everything posted by MisterrSingh

  1. Yup. They're compensating for their own perceived previous misdeeds. It happens a lot in other religions, too. The most fervent are those who have a past they want to erase. I'm some ways, fair play to them for wanting to reform, but it does come across as trying too hard. Insecure. Hollow.
  2. It's karmic punishment for the Rape of Nanjing and Pearl Harbour. Oy vey!
  3. Have you ever heard them talk about Italy once Britain enters their greedy horizons? They act as if Italy is a third world backwater. They treat it like a temporary stopover while milking the Italian benefits system to purchase property over there, which they then sell before moving to the UK. They say things like, "We want to come over to UK from Italy because of our kids' education." Yeah, you're all going to be curing cancer and developing interstellar travel. Clown show. Make no mistakes, these people are ice cold and calculating. There is no soul and warmth in these people. Machines. Absolute cogs and machines.
  4. With the right amount of inducements of various sorts, even the barbaric religious fervour of an Al Qaeda, Taliban, or an ISIS can be abated by locals (who possess the adequate resources) giving them enough time to procure an escape route, because ultimately the inevitable can only be delayed, never cancelled. But, as you said, they choose not to.
  5. I miss the time when identifying and discussing these uncomfortable facts didn't result in being labelled bigoted or traitorous. The "victim" industry doesn't like nuance. It wants people to fit into neatly delineated categories and roles even at the expense of reality. As for Afghani Sikhs they are a mercantile breed. Read history and you'll realise their "type" have a particular mentality that is unique to their role and purpose. It's very interesting. An Afghani Sikh sees an Afghani Muslim to be closer to their heart than a non-Afghani Sikh. Top kek.
  6. "We"? You handing out visas now? Is Punjab a sovereign state not under Indian rule?
  7. Anytime something happens to Sikhs that doesn't have the hand of Hindustan behind it, we go crying and begging to India to protect us. Why?
  8. Exactly. But shouldn't we be smart enough to realise when they're using it on us? Why do we play into their hands? A demographic of our size and reach should have eyes and ears everywhere; be aware of ALL enemies not just the one standing in front of us. Sikhs have this fatal blind spot whereby unless someone is directly seen to be working against us we don't identify them. If an enemy (Muslims) is flattering us and pretending to be an ally while working behind our backs to put the squeeze on us 20, 40 years down the line, we're oblivious to it.
  9. You got triggered when I criticised Simranjit Singh's conciliatory post about them! How is that not supporting them? Sikhs like you tend to draw these false equivalences between our struggle with the Indian state, and Muslim agitation against the same opponents. The only valid constant in both instances is the opposition. When we "support" Muslims in their endeavours against India it's like a boar supporting a tiger in the tiger's battle against a rhino; the tiger doesn't need or give a f**k whether he has the boar's support or not. When Muslims "support" Sikhs in our conflicts against India, it's like the tiger nudging the boar to fight the rhino knowing the boar's going to get destroyed by the rhino BUT the boar might get a few lucky shots in, and this makes the tiger feel a little better, because he wants to see the rhino in pain. Nevertheless, it's all entertainment for the tiger, because he's a tiger, and nothing will affect him.
  10. This could easily be cross-posted in the Laughter thread, but posting it here throws up an interesting conversation or two: Pack it up, Singho and Singhniya, it seems most of us are Alt-Right extremists. ? Now ask yourself who would benefit from erasing these aspects of existence, and why.
  11. He tries too hard. It comes across as cringe. Subtlety is not his thing.
  12. I'm poking holes in your woolly logic because people tend not to get challenged in echo chambers. Once you're forced to leave your echo chamber and take your poorly constructed arguments into reality, someone with half a brain will make you, your arguments, and the movement look foolish. You're making a similar mistake. "India's going after Muslims like they went after us, so I'm going to support these Jihadis." Fair enough... until that Jihadi sits down next to you, a loved one, etc, on a bus with a bomb strapped to him. What you going to do, then? Your support has enabled that behaviour. It's that same Sikh bull5hit tatti about "the enemy of my enemy being my friend" that is seeing Muslims encroaching Sikh villages in India. Where's that going to get us in 25+ years? People like you are going for a scorched earth policy not realising that scorched earth will also consume YOU.
  13. Would you welcome being blown up by one of them?
  14. Ironically, if we go by various exalted rehatnamas and similar such writings produced post-The Gurus Period, an influential class of ex-Brahmins who'd converted to Sikhi (supposedly) had maneuvered themselves into the decision-making apparatus of the religion, who, subsequently -- surprise-surprise -- were producing apparently divinely inspired writings that legitimised and prioritised individuals of their own background in terms of special status and power within the Panth itself. So we basically went full circle from complaining about social injustice under Brahmins prior to 1469, to a Brahmin overseer class infiltrating Sikhi as one of us in order to continue holding onto the reins of whatever spiritual and temporal power was present in the Panth at the time. And apparently this latter period is the golden age we need to return to. ? We're being played by chalakhoos in the Panth.
  15. A rather spicy hot-take but one with merit. The British inculcated structure and organisation; some would suggest to the detriment of groups they considered non-essential to their plans to rule. The lines between what passed as Sikhi and Punjabi Hinduism prior to the British may as well not even have existed. There was a hell of a lot of crossover to the point where the ground reality was a laissez-faire adherence to Sikhi if I'm being generous. Those who lament a puritan Sikhi do so not because of a genuine dardh for a lost civilisation or way of life, but because what emerged under the British -- and the later Singh Sabha efforts to reform -- sidelined their own particular tribe while elevating others. A return to the "good old" days prior to the SS and the British actually signals a closer adherence to Hinduism. Is that what Sikhs desire?
  16. You've missed my point. Human blood is priceless. Human blood + the manner in which it's spilled can be harnessed in many interesting ways via the correct ritualistic process. You're seeing it merely through the jingoistic "let's go out in a blaze of glory." I'm saying wasteful and random blood letting is not sensible, and I'm ALWAYS suspicious of those who advocate martyrdom for other people's sons and daughters yet are conspicuous by their absence when it comes to stepping up themselves.
  17. These "own citizen children" stop being productive members of the land of their birth when they attend training camps where they learn skills to kill the people around them, lol. "Higher education" my chittar.
  18. If you look into the ancient practice of blood sacrifices (that continue to this day) as a transactional "ardaas" that's expected to reap a physical response / "reward" for blood-letting (be it of the martyr himself or his victims), most religiously based martyrdom is actually an occult ritual. The shedding of blood AND the intention of the sacrifice are key. As the old Punjabi saying goes, "When the blood of martyrs is spilled, the fortune of nations is changed." We need to understand this esoterically and not purely in political or physical terms. Problem is the energy / life force in blood isn't going to who you think it's going to. A loving, almighty God doesn't require blood for sustenance or as an act of devotion. Just something to think on.
  19. Desh bhagats will claim, "You're focusing on the negative aspects of India" rather than have any solutions to these clear and ever present problems that aren't going away.
  20. Most of us have an elder male relative who looks like him. ?
  21. Not something that's Sikh centric per se, but features a visible Sikh character. Ennis is hit and miss for me, but I'm curious about this one.
  22. So Sikhs are simple minded, mildly retarded fools who go through life from one disaster to the next? Yeah, thanks Bollywood.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use