Jump to content

ChardikalaUK

Members
  • Posts

    789
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Everything posted by ChardikalaUK

  1. Might delay Sikhs becoming a minority in Punjab for a few more years. Do these students actually study and work in a related field after their course or is it purely for immigration?
  2. They are a nuisance everywhere they go. It's only a matter of time before civil war in the west.
  3. Who started the men and women sitting seperately in western gurdwaras? you don't see this behaviour in India. Will you complain about that as well?
  4. That is completely normal. This seperation of men and women is only found in western gurdwaras. In India families sit together whether it is in the Gurdwara proper or the Langar hall.
  5. They could offer both floor and table seating. With today's western lifestyle people are less flexible and may find it hard to eat on the floor. Say what you will about the fixo and trim Singhs, there are still far more turbaned Sikhs in a Ramgarhia Gurdwara sangat than a Singh Sabha one. The majority of Ramgarhias came from Africa, I'm one of the few whose parents both came from India. The Africa influence is big amongst them, even their offspring. I've seen several wear Kenya wristbands, something I find very strange as they were pretty much kicked out of there. They also like to go on about Makindu Gurdwara like it is equivalent to Harmandir Sahib and Anandpur Sahib! If I was ever kicked out of the UK you wouldn't see me wearing the Union Jack. Anyway the majority of the youngsters in Slough are abandoning both Ramgarhia and Singh Sabha and are going to Guru Maneyo Granth instead.
  6. I know, but to get things moving you can start a topic on mindless things such as my wife/mother in law did this and have multiple replies. Those get a lot of replies.
  7. Mr Patel or Mr Sharma next door are unlikely to groom your daughter or try to convert her. Suls are the absolute worst people to live amongst.
  8. The Palestinians are no different than any other Muslim group. I have little to no sympathy for them given how Sikhs in Afghanistan and Pakistan have been treated in modern times. Bethlehem had a Christian population of 85% in 1993, today it is 15%, that should tell you everything. https://thediplomat.com/2014/09/the-killing-of-the-sikhs/ Screw these suls and let them fight their own battles. They love killing each other anyway when there is no yahood, Hindu or Sikh to fight against.
  9. We have never been a people about needless conquest and forcing others to believe in our religion. Even Maharaja Ranjit Singh's conquest of Muslim majority Greater Punjab, Kashmir and Khyber Pakhtunkwa were motivated by self defence against Muslim aggression.
  10. It's true, that's why there was no widespread outrage about the massacres against the Gujarati/Rohingaya/Uyghur muslims. Anyway they are a violent people. Live by the sword die by the sword.
  11. Yes exactly, no Arab country actually wants Palestinians living amongst them for the reasons you gave. Israel even withdrew from Gaza completely in 2006 but Hamas still continued to launch rocket attacks. There is no outrage amongst muslims about the atrocities in Yemen and Syria.
  12. Jews are not weak, they humiliated the Arabs in the 6 day war and that was before they received lots of help from the USA. They have been taking more and more Palestinian land over the years. They have good armed forces and their orthodox community ensures their birth rate remains high. It is the impotent Arabs that are weak. Street thugs are no match for governments. Do you think the likes of Britain and France which ruled much of the world will just let muslims take over? I don't think so. They have either planned this mess or will have plans to deal with the muslims in the future. Remember muslims and other ethnic minorities are very few in numbers in the armed forces and police. White Europeans will never become muslims en masse, Western Europe is mostly a post religious society that lives a drink and pork. The muslims will cause civil war in Europe. Hindutvass are weirdos that simultaneously like Hitler and Jews.
  13. Post World War 1 Muslim nations have been very weak fighting non muslims. They've been beaten in wars against the UK, USA, India, Israel. There is no Muslim superpower. I do agree that one day Westerners will run out of patience with them but we will also feel the brunt of their wrath.
  14. If you think about all of the messed up stuff that happens in India it's suspicious they give a death sentence to a Sikh woman so quickly, blatant discrimination although I'm not against the punishment, the same should apply to Hindus.
  15. https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/british-mum-hanged-india-murdering-poisoning-husband/ https://www.sloughobserver.co.uk/news/23864900.ramandeep-kaur-mann-slough-sentenced-death-india/ Brutal, why not just move away from the husband if he's not giving you a divorce. The greedy witch wanted his money.
  16. There are so many wars and conflicts throughout the world, this one is always highlighted too much for some reason. No one really talks about how these Arabs are slaughtering each other in Yemen. Arab on Arab violence is fine but the muslims get hysterical when the Israelis do the same. Arabs are violent people and have a habit of killing each other, Syria and Libya are examples.
  17. Well said, Banda Singh Bahadur went overboard in Sirhind but it had to be done and he reflected on it afterwards and agreed he went to far. I'm sure it was the same with Hari Singh Nalwa. To deal with aggressive people you have to be aggressive back, the Gandhi turn the other cheek mentality will just get you slaughtered.
  18. Yes the Mizrahi are the majority but Israel is run by the white European Ashkenazi, they've never had a Mizrahi Prime Minister, in fact all of their high achievers have been of Ashkenazi origin. The Mizrahi were thrown out of North African and Middle Eastern countries by the Arabs so yes they are very against them.
  19. Maybe the people who committed such acts saw members of their family killed by muslims or heard of them. It is human nature. You have to remember the muslims also did the same to us. There were also more of them in East Punjab compared to the number of Sikhs in West Punjab so it was a case of a larger group. Of people being in the wrong place in the wrong time. Most of the businesses and economy in Lahore was run by Hindus but that was not enough as it was about 65% Muslim. As you mentioned before on this thread Sikhs have little influence anywhere. Our population is miniscule in South Asia and the world, we're also not clever like the Jews. We should be thankful that we have a state that has a Sikh majority so at least we get to have a Chief Minister.
  20. As I said, demographics matter, in fact we got the Gurdaspur district which was Muslim majority. I don't think Pakistanis got any Sikh/Hindu majority area. Just because we ruled a lot of greater Punjab for 50 years doesn't mean the whole of it belongs to us. Using that logic the muslims could say they should still be ruling over most of India. Punjab does not equal Sikhi. Regarding the violence, the muslims were doing the same to us, it was <banned word filter activated> for tat and it was the muslims who started it in Rawalpindi and they also got up to similar shenanigans on the other side of India in Calcutta.
  21. These guys have an inherent violent nature to them. They've been slaughtering each other throughout the middle east, just look at this Yemen war and in other places like Syria and Iraq. But because this time it is an outsider fighting them they are crying tears of genocide etc.
  22. What was the alternative? Live side by side with muslims who are the majority in the state? The chief minister of Punjab would always be a Muslim and so would the head of police. Do you want to hear the Muslim call to prayer 5 times a day? Do you want their men perving on your female relatives? It's one thing living next to Muslims in the British Raj era where everyone was against the British rule. After the era of kings and emperors demographics count and the muslims heavily outnumbered us in Punjab and with their breeding habits the gap would be even more today. Not to mention post 9/11 Pakistanis have gotten even more fundamental with bombs going off left right and centre in their cities, do you want that happening in Amritsar and Ludhiana? The Hindus still regret letting the muslims stay behind in large numbers and their numbers are forever growing. We at least nipped the problem in the bud. The muslims started the violence with the Rawalpindi massacre on us and we just did the same back to them with extra. Compare that with the Bengali Hindus who got massacred in Noakali and never did a similar attack back, that's why their West Bengali state is 27% muslim today and why Hindus in Bangladesh have gone from around 22% in 1970 to a paltry 8% today. So I don't condone any of the violence but if you don't retaliate when something bad is done to you or your community you just present yourself as being weak and that is what muslims take advantage of. They are a community that likes to test the waters, they push and push and see if there is any reaction from the other community, if not they show even more bravado. That's what happened when the Rohingyas were preying on Buddhist Burmese women and also when the muslims burnt the train in Gujarat, the Buddhists and Hindus then went berserk on them.
  23. As mentioned muslims only understand savagery done back to them. That's why we were so successful back in 1947 despite being in much smaller numbers. We outsavaged them. Just remember what the Taliban did to Afghan Sikhs.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use