SinghPunjabSingh

I think the main issue is not so much against the Sarbat da Bhala concept. It is more to do with why Khalsa Aid are spending charitable donations from their 98% Sikh donors upon giving Qurans (and Bibles) to children!? So two books which openly advocate Slavery and Genocide against non-believers are being distributed by a supposed "Sikh" charity receiving their donations from 98% Sikh donors. It's beyond bizarre and madness in the extreme. And if they do insist on allocating only 15% of funds to assist Sikhs and 85% to assist non-Sikhs then surely they could be more judicious in using their funds allocated for non-Punjabi's to assist children in the areas where our Panj Piare came from outside Punjab or black African children in sub-Saharan Africa who the Christian and Muslim Slavemasters could care less about rather than continually prioritizing white skinned Arabs (who are already assisted by 50 plus Muslim majority countries) or well fed Europeans (who the NATO countries are already financially supporting). Ravi Singh is a good Sikh at heart but he needs to think and reflect on what is a sensible course of action re sewa.

Bhai Mokham Singh Ji of the Panj Piare were in fact born in Dwarka, Gujarat state. And yes four of the Panj Piare were non-Punjabi's which is something we need to educate the Indian public about.

1. Good on you that you are not rushing to become Amritdhari without feeling ready in your heart to do so. 2. That's actually a sign of humility and I respect you for that but whenever you are ready to lay down your life to protect the oppressed and downtrodden like our Panj Piare decided to do then your mind should not think in terms of the Khalsa Panth "deserving better than you". That more so applies to those that chak Amrit one day and drink alcohol the next. 3. You are not an embarassment to the Sikh Panth. I hate the tone of some of your posts as other young Sikhs imbibe that same spirit it would be very worrying and dispiriting for the Qaum. But I am proud of you for not cutting your kes during the time you have been looking to get married. It also takes bravery to put your personal life out there. I support you as a brother and I know everyone else does too (regardless of intellectual disagreements). You having children would not weaken or pollute the Qaum. It would strengtehn it. If your kids discover the cure for cancer or HIV you never know that might even erect a statue to CaliforniaSardar in Fresno (or Turlock or Ceres at least). Before you ask let me state that Sikhs should not be wasting money on nonsense statues either!

1. No 2. Emphatically not! 3. Not really - how holy could a City where Muslims were the majority before 1947 (and Hindu's are the majority since 1947) possibly be? 4. It is not essential (after all Amritsar is not our version of Mecca or Benares as Sikhi opposes the "pilgrimage" concept) 5. In terms of what Harmandir Sahib means to the Qaum it is "primus inter pares" (first among equals) for what it means to our Itihaas but if you matha tek before Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj at any other Gurdwara in the world daily that is in no way any less a positive and equal blessing. PS: I will answer your other posts as soon as I can later and just by answering your questions does not mean I know more than you. We are all students (Sikhs). And yes I'm including as fellow students even the moneh you hate so much!

1. Yes indeed it was a white bully. There are hardly any African Americans in the 98% white (appropriately named) suburb of Whiteland. 2. I disagree. In my life I have only ever encountered good vibes from the Caribbean community (but your experiences may be different). We can't lump all black people into one monolith. If one or two Somali Muslim druggies mugged a bazurg or two in Rexdale that bears no relation to the overall good relations that Sikhs enjoy with our Caribbean ancestry brethren who are overwhelmingly great people (aside from one or two youngsters that may have gone off the rails). I think you might be perceiving what druggies are up to in the States for Canada as the dynamics are totally different north of the Border. 1. This is not the case. One or two junkie Somali Muslims robbing a bazurg or two in Etobicoke park is in no way reflective of the fact Caribbean migrant communities also share a similar Commonwealth migration story working in the same factories and encountering the same racism in years gone by and with good relations between Sikh and Caribbean elders throughout. 2. Yes more British Sikhs should make the move out to Canada. Good for them. Sikhs are doing just fine in Canada (better than most immigrants) and don't need any business assistance. But Sikhs certainly do need to provide greater targetted mentoring to that small minority at risk of falling prey to the lure of easy money. The drug dealing clowns in BC are less than a 1% minority. A lot of the original dealers were from families associated with perpetrating the Congress Genocide of Sikhs in the 1980's. Albeit now they capture vulnerable youth as pawns and the "get rich die trying" mentality encouraged by gangster rap financed by the Republican Tea Party type financiers does not help the situation. A somewhat similar situation exists musically whereby a lot of bhangra records and artists are put out there by a famous label run by Pakistani Jatt businessmen. You are absolutely right. But if Bhagwant Mann plays his cards right there can be big changes over the next 5 years with projected economic growth of 50% over the next 5 years particularly if Diaspora Sikhs start to seriously invest in east Punjab now that anti-Sikh leaders like Amrinder and the Badals who were actively preventing inward investment from Diaspora Sikhs have finally been soundly beaten at the ballot box. None of the Western countries can match that level growth in the next 5years. And Punjab is projected to have a $1trillion dollar economy by 2050 (the overall Indian economy is projected to be $42trillion by 2050 ie twice the size of the present day American economy). https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/research-insights/economy/the-world-in-2050.html The most important thing is that along with this economic progress Sikhi grows in leaps and bounds in Punjab (and throughout India). If our community can arise from the brink of disaster at the point we are at currently and somehow through our collective efforts become the largest united indigenous non-Muslim demographic in India (no individual Hindu caste exceeds more than 4% of the 1.4 billion Indian population) then 100 million Sikhs with a $1 trillion in east Punjab and access to the purse strings of a $42 trillion economy in India collectively then the Sikh Panth will be unstoppable and in an entirely different position within 28years time. The next 5years will be key be to setting the agenda if we can ensure only one united Gurdwara per pind (and locality in the West) as the first building block then that will stand us in good stead.

Bro you make your own luck in life. I understand that with you living in a trailer park in Modoc County it's hard for you to ever go to the Gurdwara but try to expand your horizons. Go to the Gurdwareh in the the Central valley as often as you can and try to run into more of the 100,000 plus strong Sikh population in Cali. Try not to pre-define women as non-Sikh just because they visit a beautician every now and then. If you don't like the Cali girls make a few trips to Vancouver and Seattle. If you don't like girls from the West Coast then keep an open mind for those from Toronto and NY/NJ. And if Diaspora born girls aren't to your liking then consider making six monthly journeys to Punjab. Believe in yourself as a human being and a Sikh. The Gurkha's might be small and they might struggle to put on muscle mass but one of them can easily pump lead into 20 taller Pathans on the battlefield. Make the best of what God has blessed you with. Two eyes, two arms and two legs are better than many others in a worse position in life. Be thankful for what you have, don't judge women too much and you will be fine and you will get married this year I (Bichola Singh) guarantee it! This! This! Most guys will get rejected on online dating. Does that mean you cannot find one wife out of millions of fish in the sea. In the States there are plenty of Gujarati women too who have married Sikhs via Anand Karaj and are proud to be raising their children as Sikhs armed with the knowledge that one of the Panj Piare (Bhai Mokham Singh Ji) was Gujarati. Don't give up on life and don't give up on believing in yourself. You are an intelligent guy. Kudos that you did not cut your kes just to find a wife and I will DM you with options in Cali provided you commit yourself to helping others in your same situation in the future once you are married. That is setting one self up for self-prophesised failure brother. Snap out of this self-pity please. Even all the people who have been enraged by your posts recently care about you as a brother. Don't believe the hype! And so what if you luck out with a gold-digger due to a lack of due diligence then even that experience (what doesn't kill you makes you stronger) will only strengthen your mindset further in life overall in the bigger picture but that's a 5-10% worst case possibility at most and at least you would have tried. Don't just focus on external beauty but try to look at inner characteristics a bit more if you can. Who cares if a few gold-diggers need you to own a ranch in Orange County!? Look for what you want and care about and try and find that instead. These are dangerous stereotypes about Amritdhari's which I strongly disgree with. Whilst that may be true in the circles you mix with but I can assure there are plenty of physically strong "Rehitdhari's" with children unless you are specifically referring to those circles where being unmarried is somehow regarded as "cool" because their God-in-human-flesh-Baba did that! But yes all Sikhs need to be tyaar bar tyaar physically and psychologically if our Qaum is to reach a greater percentage of its inherent and unlimited potential.

The natives in Nunavut etc and other indigenous tribes really had no choice and clearly in such circumstances or times of war when no other foods are available the Khalsa Fauj would sustain themselves via whatever was available. However, in the West in the 21st century it is more than easy enough to avoid consuming meat. If folks are only eating meat to keep their taste buds happy in the West then one day we never know aliens could very well make the same argument that human flesh tastes as good to them as a prime beef steak or roasted pork chops or barbecued chicken does to humans!

I did not agree with Deep Sidhu campaigning for SSM as I wanted Bhagwant Mann to defeat Congress and the Badals. Nor do I see Deep Sidhu as some sort of superhero. But one thing Deep Sidhu certainly was = a Sikh. A sehajdhari one yes but emphatically a member of the Sikh Panth and one who had done more for Sikh interests in the last 18months than you have. So sehajdhari Sikhs are all denouncing Sikhi? Does the mere fact that they are not Kesdhari at this point in time means they are denouncing Sikhi and have no connection to the Sikh Panth and hence no right to even turn up to the Gurdwara? My understanding is that Reena Rai is a sehajdhari Sikh Doctor from California who uploaded his social media videos during the Morcha. They both worked in a Punjabi film together a few years back. Whatever his private life (which I don't know much and nor do I endorse) I sincerely do believe he cared about the Sikh Panth in his own way and his speeches and actions the last 18months confirm that to my mind. Do you believe the Sikh community comprises 2% of the east Punjab population or just over half of the current population there? If you believe that Sikhs are only the 2% in Punjab (ie only those who are Amritdhari and Kesdhari like the Badal's) do the Sikhs really have any right to protest against Genocide? Have you ever complained about Genocide against Sikhs? So should Sikhs give up without even trying to bother achieving something? So if according to your definition Sikhs and moneh constitute 0.1% (1 in a 1000 Americans) of the American population and Sikhs such as myself and yourself constitute 0.01% (1 in 10,000 Americans) of the American population ... then surely logic would dictate that members of 0.01% demographic in the States would find it difficult to find a spouse from the same background as themselves. Would you not agree? And if so, is your strategy that Kesdhari Sikhs simply die out as a Qaum but criticise moneh harshly enough so that they never consider becoming future members of the Khalsa Panth due to your one man agenda of hating on them (as the RSS would like you to do)? Do you not see that it suits the enemies of Sikhi just fine to define membership of the Sikh Panth as narrowly as possible in order to define Sikhs as small a demographic minority as possible? So the Arabs of Mecca and Hindutva thinkers and Vatican chomo's all realise that the more inclusively you define a group the more power there is in numbers. But you sitting in sunny Cali think that by defining Sikhs as small and powerless demographic that it somehow helps your community and indeed yourself (in finding a spouse)?

@MisterrSingh I don't believe we share any mythological history with Hindu's. Though Gurbani does make use of exclusively Hindu mythology in order to illustrate to pantheists that there is only One Ik Onkar that we need focus on.

The biggest parchaar is the Truth of Sikhi that Guru Sahib says that the oppressed and brutalised slaves were the highest of the high (because those that suffer the most are the closest to God/ParmAathmah) whereas the Kings, Royalty and Slaveowners are the lowest of the low (on account of the oppression and suffering they inflict upon others). It is crystal clear what the Truth is and sub-Saharan Africans and the African American community (and poor Indians) are natural born Sikhs (only they don't know it yet at the moment as we haven't done enough parchaar and outreach to them nor has Sikhi been compared and contrasted with the Slavemaster religions by those communities yet).

Africa can comfortably accommodate 4 billion people imho. As that would be a population density of around 125 people per square km with plentiful resources. In contrast the population density for Punjab is in excess 600 per sq/km today in 2022 which is almost double the UK's population density (despite the UK having one of the highest European population densities). The bigger issue is that two big Slavemaster religions could increase their flock by an *extra BILLION* or so *each* in Africa if the Truth of Sikhi is not exposed to more black Africans than the limited few thousand indigenous black African Sikhs that have come into Sikhi this millenium in Kenya (for which I would give United Sikhs some credit).

The 1947 Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs and the Congress Genocide of Sikhs in the 1980's should give us even more urgency in the need to increase the demographic strength of the Sikh Panth precisely to avoid potential future Genocides. If we keep Sikhi as a closed book restricted only to those Punabi's lucky enough to be born within a Sikh background family (especially since our people don't always exactly appreciate it fully despite the blessings that Sikhi bestows upon us) it's a recipe for ongoing and future demographic disaster. A future 100 million plus strong Sikh Panth (via parchaar and sewa) will never suffer Genocide. Our own failure as Diaspora Sikhs to support our own and to destroys labels amongst ourselves in the West cannot really be laid at the doors of the powers that be in the White House or 10 Downing Street (their support for groomers aside).

Concrete undeniable logic in your argument that nobody can disagree with particulary over the next 10 years. Particularly in the context of the demographic projections which mean that east Punjab is on track for a Sikh minority by the 2031 census unless we: *do parchaar to Bihari's from the birthplace of Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj + Shaheed Bhai Jiwan Singh Ji *increase the TFR towards 5 children among Sikh families via earlier age of marriage in early 20's for men *proactively look after the welfare of poorer sections of the Sikh Panth *ensure only one United Gurdwara per pind (and locality in the West) *eradicate use of caste based labels and matrimonial apartheid *eradicate the scourge of drugs and alcohol in Punjab *welcome sehajdhari brothers and sisters as equal stakeholders in the Sikh Panth that can contribute and strongly care about the Panth be they people like Deep Sidhu or non-Punjabi's who know Sikhi is true as an ideology but are perhaps not quite ready to adopt Amritdhari discipline in their own lives just yet *eradicate abortion and female infantcide as a silent Genocide among those from a Sikh background in Punjab *ensure better health and rehabilitations in Punjab and combat carcinogens and increasing organic farming

1. What is your Plan B then given that Sikhs (despite counting Radha Soami, Nirankari and Sirsa followers within our numbers) are on course to be less than 50% of the east Punjab population by the 2031 census? 2. How can any Hindu make any Sikh with half a brain cell believe in caste, superstition or imaginary Devi Devta's? 3. Well half of Guru Nanak Dev Ji's and Guru Arjan Dev Ji's Sikhs were former Muslims who left Islam including famous apostates like Bhai Mardana Ji but yes if during the last 100years virtually all new Sikhs have come from a Hindu background then why would we ignore a 1.1 Billion population as a potential source of growing Sikh numbers? 4. Sikh numbers grew by 50% during Giani Ditt Singh's intellectual leadership of the Qaum when Sikhs were subjugated by the British Empire. When we have Dhan Dhan Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj to guide us Guru Sahib are enough. 5. I think you will find that Punjabi Brahmin Muslims + Kashmiri Brahmin Muslims are over-represented in terrorist ranks and represent the majority of that particular caste in historic areas of Punjab and Indian Kashmir too. 6. Nobody is expecting Hinduism to end overnight but I do believe that Vaisakhi 1699 and the undeniable irrefutable Truth of Sikhi can reach out to millions of so-called (falsely classified) Hindu's in this century. 7. Then why did Sikh numbers grow by 50% between 1881-1921? 8. What elite status status have 250 million so-called Dalits been enjoying and what connections do 1 billion poor Indians struggling to put food on the table currently enjoy exactly? 9. What political power did Sikhs hold between 1881-1921 during the heyday of the racist British Empire? 10. Why do you class the Sikh Qaum as beggars and a powerless people when Sikhs are richer than Hindu's on a per capita basis? 11. Sikhi is the undeniable and irrefutable Truth so how can Sikhi have nothing to offer humanity according to you?

I hear you and agree with you to a degree. Certainly, it would be foolhardy for us to throw funds at places like Somalia. However, the 15million orphans in sub-Saharan Africa in countries where Sikhs are not despised as non-believers heading to hell can certainly benefit from educational assistance to set up schools, access to clean water and simple eye clinics. The future population of Africa is 2.5 Billion by the year 2050 and projected to be over 4 Billion plus by the year 2100. Punjabi's have had the truth of Sikhi before them for 500years and yet only 10% of the historical Punjab population (Pakistani Punjab, east Punjab, Haryana and Himachal) is Sikh today. However, if between 1 to 10% of gareeb Africans came to understand and relate to Sikhi as the only faith that opposes Slavery and discrimination then that could be a game changer to put Sikhi on the global map within the next 28 years. But no doubt about it the poorer sections of the so-called 1.1billion Hindu demographic in India today (as defined by Hindutva thinkers) is the likely number one source of new (primarily sehajdhari) Sikhs for the next 20years. Only when we have tens of millions of new sehajdhari Sikhs can Amritdhari diamonds arise to create a new and revitalised (primarily non-Punjabi) Khalsa Panth (as we as Punjabi's have failed dismally to propagate Sikhi forward in the last 100years). Of course before all that, we have to ensure that Muslims, Christians, Derawadi's (Hindutva proxies) and Manuwadi's (Hindutva castesists) do not jointly leave Sikhs as a minority in east Punjab by the 2031 census. Sikhs were 5% of the Punjabi population around the year 1800 and we were a minority in all districts of Punjab in 1947 when our numbers had risen to 13% of all Punjabi's, so we are used to being a minority. But now it is time for Ekta within the Panth and for us to drop labels and hypenated identities and ensure only one united Gurdwara per pind and locality in the West and educate outsiders as to why Sikhi is the solution to all their problems (and globally) and why they should also be part of the Sikh Panth. When Sikhs get to 100million strong that will be when we can truly do Sarbat da Bhala.

1A. So if most Jatts are Muslims and 85% plus of Jatts are NOT Sikhs then why exactly are Sikhs (who should have no caste) meant to think highly of the supposed bravery of Muslim Jatts during the Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs in 1947 when 25% of the Sikh population was killed? Why should Sikhs think highly of the supposed bravery of the Delhi Police Hindu Jatts and Sajjan Kumar that organised Hindu and Muslim mobs to burn Sikhs to death? 1B. I am proud of all Sikhs that were brave and fearless who happened to be from Jatt ancestral backgrounds. As equally as I am proud of all brave Sikhs that were from Ramgarhia, Ravidassia, Brahmin, Khatri, Bihari etc backgrounds too. The key being that Jatt ancestry or any other ancestry did NOT make our Shaheeds brave. It was their faith in Sikhi (and their rejection of biraderi identity) that made our Qaum de heereh brave. 2. Most Punjabi Khatri's are Muslims. Hindu Khatri's are the second most numerous. Sikhs of Khatri background are the smallest minority faith among that demographic. And the ones from the Pakistan (the so-called "bhaapay" as you like to call them) suffered greatly during the 1947 Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs in which 25% of the Sikh population was killed. So please educate me on the benefit of why you would label the Sikh minority from that background as selfish? How does that create Ekta among Sikhs? We need to destroy labels and matrimonial apartheid amongst ourselves as Sikhs rather than stereotype fellow Sikhs. 3. So if Nehru or Indira Gandhi or Vaidya or some rabidly vocal Manuwadi dogs on Twitter hate us does that mean we should ignore a 40 million strong community where there are thousands of former Hindu Brahmins who have become new members of the Sikh Panth without any parchaar (but of their own inquisitive volition)? If 1,000 Hindu's burned thousands of Sikhs to death in Delhi 1984 should we ignore 1,000 million plus so-called Hindu's as potential future members of the Sikh Panth? 4. Dashmesh Pithah does not call a 40 million strong ancestry grouping in India all as liars. Dashmesh Pithah refers to "MANUWADI SOCH". Sikhs who label other Sikhs as so-called bhaapay are exposing their own Bipran ki reet ideology. 5. Brahmins and Bania are two different ancestry groupings so you are muddying the waters by now including Bania in the argument. But the fact of the matter is you and I both hate the RSS ideology and "MANUWADI SOCH". Those types are indeed the enemy of Sikhs. But the way to beat our enemies is by outreach to their own so-called One Billion plus Hindu demographic and encourage as many Brahmins and Bania and other so-called Hindu's to join the Sikh Panth as sehajdhari Sikhs. Brahmins are 40 million in population. Via parchaar the Sikh Panth can become more numerically stronger, avoid future (and current) Genocides and do greater sewa towards Sarbat da Bhala via greater demographic numbers. Instead of looking at all Hindu Jatts and Hindu Brahmins as enemies we can achieve more by educating them about Sikhi and welcoming them into the Panth. 6. RSS wants to finish Sikhi I agree with you. But Sikhi can never be destroyed because it is 100% Truth. Hindutva uses unwitting Sikhs to do it's dirty work via two main methods. Firstly the RSS define anyone with a pulse as a Hindu in order to create a one billion plus strong votebank. Conversely, the RSS encourage casteist-minded people from a Sikh background to try sow discord and enmity amongst Sikhs as a small minority community. The other trick they use is by making confused Sikhs self perceive that only an Amritdhari is a Sikh (in order to define the Sikhs like Badal as a 2% minority in Punjab). Sikhi can destroy the RSS by welcoming the majority of the so-called one billion plus Hindu's as tomorrow's sehajdhari Sikhs. The RSS ideology is of caste exploitation and religious discrimination against other Dharmic faiths such as Sikhi, Buddhism and Jainism. The Sikh ideology is for equality and justice for all and Sarbat da Bhala and our inspiration is from 1699 when 5 brave men from Gujarat, from Karnataka, from Orissa, from Hastinapur and from Sialkot bravely stood up for the rights of the Oppressed and downtrodden at Vaisakhi 1699.

1. I get that. But it is pointless to demonise 40million Hindu Brahmins when our job should instead be to educate them about the glorious examples of our Shaheeds (Bhai Mati Das Ji and Bhai Sati Das Ji as two prominent examples) to welcome as many as we can from that community into the Sikh Panth. On this website we have one Amritdhari Gursikh who was a former Hindu Brahmin (Mehtab Singh) and another Sikh poster (who was born a Hindu) but regularly attends Gurdwara with his family. I personally know of an Amritdhari family that were former Hindu Brahmins at my childhood Gurdwara. We cannot expect 40 million Hindu Brahmins to all become Amritdhari. But i don't think it is major stretch to inspire people via the bravery of Shaheed Bhai Mati Das Ji and Shaheed Bhai Sati Das Ji so that they become sehajdhari members of the Sikh Panth instead of simply making folks hate us with generalised attacks like "Bammans are Liars" 2. Not at all. There is no room for caste in Sikhi. However, pointing out the ancestry of certain great Gurmukhs and Shaheeds of the past can sometimes open the eyes of those who hate us into hopefully understanding Sikhi. Besides I strongly believe that sure maybe 5% of the rabidly vocal "manuwadi soch" Hindu Brahmins may well hate and despise Sikhs as Indira Gandhi did (as Sikhi represents a revolutionary threat to Manuwadi Soch given that Sikhi emphasises the equality of all). But 95% of the said community clearly do not and the fact that most Punjabi Brahmins are Muslims and that most Kashmiri Brahmins are Muslims should give us an indication that this is a community that logically ought to be more receptive to Sikhi via parchaar due to higher levels of education. Additionally before 1947 and to a degree up to 1980 most Punjabi Hindu's used to attend Gurdwara. Had we accepted them and integrated them more as fellow Sikhs at the time (rather than thinking of them as non-Sikhs) then we would have been in a stronger position to fight the Congress Genocide of Sikhs in the 1980's.

You are absolutely correct. Gurbani and the Sikh ethos (Ardas) and motto of "Sarbat da Bhala" emphasise that. However, if there is a choice between innocent human beings dying and feeding people like Anders Breivik or other Nazi's or people who support the enslavement of Africans or other non-Muslims and non-Christians or discriminating against human beings on the basis of their so-called "caste" then we cannot distribute limited funds equally amongst all. As billionaires and millionaires and their proxies do not need Sikhs from the West to supply them pizza's, Qurans and Bibles when you have poor children in Punjab, throughout India and in sub-Saharan Africa getting no support (where the West and the Arabs care do not care two hoots if those particular non-believers die). The more we help uplift poor Sikhs today the more of a genuine future fauj there can be to do meaningful Sarbat da Bhala in the future. We should focus on Punjab, India + sub-saharan Africa rather than Europe + Middle East.

100% you are totally correct on keeping spending + business contacts to those within the Panth where possible. And in an American context that would mean supporting African American and Native owned businesses too. Just a quick clarification Gurjant Singh Ji that Gujjars are primarily a Punjabi and Hindi and Gojri speaking tribe whereas Gujju's is a nickname for Gujarati's (the people of the state of Gujarat that speak the Gujarati language). Sikhs cannot blanketly be against ethnicity on the planet for no reason. Sikhi is the universal faith for all humanity. Bhai Mokham Singh Ji of the Panj Piare were GUJARATI (just like Narendra Modi the Indian PM) Mata Gujjar Kaur was of Gujjar ancestry and Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj had partial Gujjar ancestry. But yes those Muslim Gujjars that support Sharia Law and discrimination against Sikhs cannot be surrendered to!

100% correct brother. Muslims are taught since childhood to avoid purchasing goods from Kaffirs. Yet our people enrich the descendants of those that perpetrated the 1947 Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs in which 25% of the Sikh population was killed via tourist yatra's and use any pathetic excuse under the sun to enrich and empower those same Muslims that hate and despise us (whilst ignoring our own gareeb Sikh brothers and sisters in east Punjab who need a helping hand that are being aggressively targetted by Christians - despite Christianity and Islam being responsible for the enslavement and Genocide of tens of millions of innocent human beings).

You are absolutely right. Brahmin's are 3% of the Indian population and control at max perhaps 5% of the Indian economy. The vast majority of Brahmins live in poverty albeit there was a "creamy layer" which had succeeded politically. But the Gujarati's openly boast of having ended Brahmin "Dynasty" Raj and having replaced it with "Bania Raj". Yet a lot of our people are still living in the stone ages blaming Brahmins for having "enslaved" them. It's bizarre. The most popular Amritdhari poster on this site (Mehtab Singh) was a former (Hindu) "Brahmin" too! Are you aware that most of the Kashmiri Sikhs are predominantly of Brahmin ancestry? Have you ever heard of Shaheed Bhai Mati Das Ji and Shaheed Bhai Sati Das Ji? Are you aware of the seven (Amritdhari) Sharma brothers from Patiala who defied Indira's tanks in June 1984? Have you heard of Pandit Kirpa Singh Dutt? Bhat Sikhs laid the foundations for Sikhi in the UK. Were the Bhat's who wrote Gurbani (Shabad Guru) also liars according to your opinion? If you are aware of the above facts then instead of complaining about "bahmans" and "bhaapay" why don't you concentrate on educating some of the 40 million Hindu Brahmin's to join the Sikh Panth instead of hating us?

The author of the article - Ayaan Hirsi - is herself an apostate from Islam who is warning us about the evil of Islam. Bear in mind that if current illegal immigration and Muslim fertility rates remain high there could be 13million Muslims in the UK by as soon as 2050. In contrast the Diaspora age of marriage for Sikhs, the below replacement fertility rates and our insistence upon not educating potentially receptive local populations mean that Sikh percentage in the UK is now static before likely falling in percentage terms by 2050 (unless we get our act together and educate more non-Punjabi's about why Sikhi pretty much offers the solution to their worries and more importantly all global problems). https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/uk-s-muslim-population-could-treble-by-2050-research-finds-8x5c278w3

The question is in a state (east Punjab) where: *the recent Chief Minister (Channi) was from a so-called "Dalit" background *the Chief Jathedar of the SGPC is from a so-called "Dalit" background *the majority of Granthi's & Gursewaks at Gurdwara's are from a so-called "Dalit" background *the number of so-called "Dalit" MLA's have consistently exceeded the number of Jat MLA's since 1980 *the majority of Kesdhari youth left in Punjab are from a so-called "Dalit" background *so-called "Dalits" comprise 33% of the east Punjab population in contrast to Jats who are 21% of the population *Singh Sabha was driven forward by Giani Ditt Singh who was decried by Muslims and Hindu's for being a Chamar And given the majority of the Panj Piare were from a so-called "Dalit" background ... ... why are we as Diaspora Sikhs so weak in doing sewa + parchaar about Sikhi to 250 million so-called "Dalits"? We could make a start by only having 1 united Gurdwara for all in every pind in Punjab + every locality in the West

I 100% agree with you Ji that their should be an economic boycott of our enemies within Punjab and that there should be an end to tourism and financial support or interaction with the country responsible for the 1947 Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs in which 25% of the Sikh population was killed with Pakistan so openly profiting massively from supplying Taliban supplied narcotics into east Punjab. However, can I just politely mention Kanjar was the name of the indigenous tribe to which the Bhai Mardana Ji as the first Sikh in history belonged. To us Bhai Mardana Ji is among our highest of the high as the first Sikh. But to Muslims Bhai Mardana Ji was a regarded as a wretched apostate (hence the attempted murderous attack upon Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj and Bhai Mardana by Wali Kandhari at Sri Panja Sahib) and hence the Muslims turned the name of a tribe (the Kanjars) into a pejorative term. https://panthic.org/articles/3744 Similarly, there has been significant conversion of erstwhile Hindu Gujjars in Punjab and also around Sri Ganganagar into becoming new Sikhs over the last 150 years (there are at least 100,000 Sikhs of Gujjar ancestry in east Punjab if not significantly more) initiated by Giani Ditt Singh. The fact that Mata Gujjar Kaur (and hence Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj) had Gujjar ancestry and that Banda Singh Bahadur also had Gujjar (as well as Brahmin) ancestry is a massive point if we can use this episode to turn a negative into a positive via parchaar (particularly to the 90% plus of the Gujjar community in India who are Hindu's among a population of around 20million in India). Obviously we shouldn't be wasting too much parchaar funds on the Muslim Gujjars of Jammu & Kashmir and Pakistani Punjab. But we should massively emphasise the Gujjar ancestry of Mata Gujjar Kaur and Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj and Banda Singh Bahadur to those in Malerkotla and other Muslim areas of east Punjab given what the Muslims are trying to achieve demographically in east Punjab (on behalf of their patrons and handlers in Islamabad and Delhi). Similarly with those from Bihar, we need to do parchaar to them to educate them about where Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj and Shaheed Bhai Jiwan Singh Ji were born. Parchaar has the potential to upset Delhi's demographic calculations with respect to agricultural workers from Bihar who are the backbone of the rural economy in east Punjab. https://barusahib.org/general/after-being-rejected-dalit-turned-sikhs/ We can't insist upon all Bihari or Gujjar converts to Sikhi to be Amritdhari but we need to encourage all potentially receptive demographics to feel part of their local (united) Gurdwara Sangat as either they are with us (or against us). If we continue parroting the failed ideology that someone born into a religion should remain in that faith (but just be a good exponent of it regardless of slavery, terrorism, genocide, caste discrimination, sati etc) then the results of that are clear to see now that Sikhs are barely just over 50% of the east Punjab population when including all Sirsa followers, Radha Soami's, Nirankari's within Sikh population numbers (16million of a 30million population for east Punjab in 2021). The aim of our enemies is to have us as a minority population by the 2031 census (by encouraging new age Sikhs in California and elsewhere to deliberately reject the puratan definition of an ordinary Sikh as being anyone who bows down before Dhan Dhan Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj)

Great video and thank you for sharing this. But one benti @proactive Ji please could you kindly edit the title to "Sikh-Muslims" clash. As our enemies are always only too keen to deliberately segmentalise and demonise our community into constituent parts (despite the fact that the gareeb Sikh labourer initially attacked by the Muslims had no landholding) and also to give Muslims in general a pass by arguing nonsense lies such as "all groomers are exclusively Mirpuri" (despite Mirpuri's speaking a dialect of Punjabi) or the common lie bandied about now that it's only Muslim Gujjars who are an issue despite the systematic re-introduction of Muslims into east Punjab to reduce Sikhs to a minority in Punjab by the 2031 census. We also need to redouble our efforts to replicate the example of this village among the 20 million non-Sikh Gujjars who are 90% Hindu in India (primarily in Doaba, Haryana, Rajasthan, Delhi but highly receptive to Sikhi since interaction via the the Kissan Mazdoor Morcha) but overwhelmingly Muslims in Jammu & Kashmir (and Pakistani Punjab). https://panthic.org/articles/3744