Jump to content

Jacfsing2

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    713

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Jacfsing2

  1. Jacfsing2
    Aam Sikh has never been Amritdhari, which is why if our ancestors weren't Amritdhari from the start we get these sakhis where they got married by the fire, and even if they were eventually Amritdhari by either converting to Sikhi from Hinduism or by being a sehajdhari, it's not like they got remarried according to Sikhi. When Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Angad Dev Ji and Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Amar Das Ji became Sikhs it's highly unlikely that they would remarry their spouses according to Sikh rules. The thing is once someone is married the religious ceremony they performed would matter less than the actual fact that they were husband and wife. (But either way, those who are Sikhs should marry according to the Guru's hukam).
  2. Jacfsing2
    Sarbat Khalsa used to meet every 6 months in the past, I don't think we had a new jathedar every 6 months.
  3. Jacfsing2
    You need to calm down on your stress brava.
  4. Jacfsing2
    I will never acknowledge the SGPC Jathedar over the Sarbat Khalsa Jathedar. Ek hai Guru wale Singh, Ek hai Mahant.
  5. Jacfsing2
    He's not the Akal Takht Jathedar, Jagtar Singh Hawara is, but good either way.
  6. Jacfsing2
    I was active before covid, and am now trying to get back into fitness.
  7. Jacfsing2
    Our own lot destroy our Sikh heritage more than anyone else in the name of "Kar sewa"
  8. Jacfsing2
    Who tf is Ajit Vadakakil?
  9. Jacfsing2
    I'm referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadith_of_Pen_and_Paper Both Sunnis and Shias accept this hadith. The Quran was most likely not told to him by Gabriel and he just collected Jewish/Christian sakhis and brought some pagan Arab influence and created his Quran that way.
  10. Jacfsing2
    Guru Sahib probably did, but again we can't do everything that Guru Sahib did and assume it's ok for us to do the same. We follow the Gurus hukam as Sikhs, not copying what he does, and Guru Sahib's hukam is "Anand viah binaa grahist nahee karnaa" (Not having marital affairs without Anand Karaj)
  11. Jacfsing2
    Non-Amritdharis didn't do Anand Karaj around Guru Sahib, and with the rise of old school Nirankaris under Baba Dayalthe Anand Karaj became popularized among non-amritdharis as well. The idea that Sikhs got married around a fire happened because lots of Sikhs who joined from the Hindu panth still continued this practice of havan marriage. I mean the reason Hindus get married around a fire is because that's one of their devi devte, to us it's just a fire. Naamdharis still do this fire marriage because they view Sikhi as a sect of Hindus.
  12. Jacfsing2
    Only Rehatwali Amritdharis should have power over any Gurdwaras, the problem with opening too many gurdwaras for business is a problem that Guru Sahib will surely punish the Panth for. Also Dil Saaf people are a lost cause unless they are willing to learn. Even Guru Sahib doesn't help those who claim their views are superior to Guru Sahib.
  13. Jacfsing2
    I'm not sure this is accurate, Muhammad was related to the Quraysh tribe who pretty much owned all of Pagan Arabia religious sphere, and also the fact on his death bed he wanted to write something, but his disciple Omar didn't want him to write anything.
  14. Jacfsing2
    1. Brava, just ask Hindus in India if they support actual Gursikhs like Sant Jarnail Singh Bhinderwale or Sukhdev Singh Babbar, or even Akal Takht Jathedar: Jagtar Singh Hawara, if you can get even 10% of Hindus to agree that these were proper Gursikhs and heroes, I'll admit to being wrong. 2. Grow out Panth how exactly? I didn't say they would convert, I just said those 5% of Hindus would be friendly towards us. 3. When Vaisakhi 1699 happened, we still acknowledged Guru Sahib, I hear from many so-called Sikhs today that Maharaj is a holy book, our psyche has changed from being a religion of Dharam to a religion of western ideals. 4. Only place anyone will ever be truly free is Khalsa Raj.
  15. Jacfsing2
    Even if remove the Sikh aspect to this, Sufis as a whole have been persecuted throughout history by Muslims, similar to Christian Gnostics with their religious brothers/sisters. If hypothetically Sikhi was an Abrahamic religion founded we would go that route as well, (as some Sikhs are currently transforming Sikhi into an Abrahamic faith).
  16. Jacfsing2
    I'm sure you genuinely believe in everything you are saying, but realistically speaking none of what you are saying about Hindus is true. If 80% of Hindus hate us, what does it matter if 5% of them might potentially be our allies? Alliances aren't about emotional responses, but rather politics, in situations where Hindus assist us we should be their allies, in situations where Muslims benefit us, we should be their friends, in situations where the West can be our allies, we can work with them; however, to be a ghulami and then say let's make Hindus into Sikhs is stupidity, only sovereign people can say that, and Sikhs of today are ghulami of either the West, India, or other external powers.
  17. Jacfsing2
    If we look at the Hindu and Muslim bhagats, they would be seen as those against their religion rather than loyal to the orthodoxy of their respected faiths. Peer Buddhu Shah himself was made a Shaheed for going against the orthodoxy of Aurangzeb/Islam to assist Guru Sahib.
  18. Jacfsing2
    Quebec?
  19. Jacfsing2
    Most Sikhs weren't fully versed on Rehat, and there were multiple maryadas. According to one Maryada the punishments for the 3 Kurehats was only 100 rupees, but for an Amritdhari to cut their Kesh was death and even though Guru Sahib himself, (Vaheguru's own light upon this earth), took upon Tankah for bowing to a grave, it wasn't really that common for Sikhs to do Tankah for misdoing the rehat from the time Guru Sahib left the world till about Singh Sabha.
  20. Jacfsing2
    Ranjit Singh had to take Amrit back then because all Misls had to be Amritdhari, the British originally did the same with their British Sikh regiments of having on Amritdharis, (who took Amrit from a British sponsored Punj Pyare). The thing was back then, being Amritdhari wasn't something that was seen as only religious/secular, and lots of people historically took Amrit for personal gain. (This actually increased during the Sikh Empire).
  21. Jacfsing2
    I think it's not that it was him barely getting punished, it was the fact that he was even punished at all that should be surprising. I'm going to say something controversial, but Rehat meant something different to olden Sikhs and modern Sikhs. (Most of the right-wing view on Maryada only happened when Bhai Randhir Singh came in the world and Damdami Taksal went from a Samparda into a Jatha under Sant Sundar Singh Ji).
  22. Jacfsing2
    Totally agree with you, at least in my experience pornography and video games seems to create the same triggers of wasting life.
  23. Jacfsing2
    i'm trying to quit video games
  24. Jacfsing2
    Buy from Hazur Sahib, there's a shop that has special shastars: pappu bhai shastar shop,
  25. Jacfsing2
    I'm interested in those South Indian states, why they got a high population of incest?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use

  I accept