Jump to content

Is Manmohan Singh a Sikh in disguise?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Faujan

This is what politics does to Sikhs. To anyone. To everyone. You have begun to fight amongst yourselves. Of all the things that so many people throughout this thread have posted about our Beloved Guru Ji's doing, and telling us to do, does any of the Sangat think Guru Ji would be happy to see this?

A murakh's suggestion to Sikh Sangat: get rid of this politics category.

A murakh's suggestion to the Sangat: forget about Manmohan Singh touching the feet of Hindu Holy men, and worry about whether or not you are giving up completely your mind and body, heart and soul, when you bow down and touch the feet of Your Guru Ji.

A murakh's worthless thoughts taking up precious net space. Bhul chukk di khimma bakshni, Jiyo.

Sadha hi,

Khalse di Faujan

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh man.. some really looooong post ehh.. Well.. to get straight to the point.. manmohan is sikh because he is born in sikh family.. Being born in sikh family, doesn't make you a sikh in guru jees eyes. Whether he is touching another human feet or sunbathing in bikni in california.. it doesn't matter... All matters is what is doing for humankind.. Judge the person by his work not by his religion.. He is political leader not religious one.. He should never be considered as religious guy.. not a type who should be given saropa.. cauz he ain't doing anything for sikhs at all.. So chill and relax and raise the current genx to be the Good Leaders..

:doh: :) waheguroooooooo hands down true....exactly what i tried to say :doh: :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sat sri akal to all

after seeing this photograph in wich manmohan is touching the feet of some hindu fake i can only say ----

SHAME SHAME SHAME

no.gif :doh: no.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

singh sahibo, i have decided to reopen this thread for many reasons.

firstly, after doing some research, i have been able to come across quotes from bani, where it says we can do matha theek to sants. thus it shows the gurus seeing nothing wrong in what manmohan singh was doing.

secondly, yes we have quoted from maryada especially from puratan times, but ultimatly, despite maryada being something we learn from, guru granth sahib ji maharaj clearly has more power over these maryadas. for this reason, i thought it would be best to have quotes from maharaj.

http://www.waheguru.com/What%20does%20Sri%...t%20Saints2.htm

the most stiring quote i must say, where people have come to me and said "guru sahib does not mention anywhere we should do matha theek to sants" or coming across to me and just having heart attacks, but what does bani really say....

kir swDU AMjulI punu vfw hy ]

kar saadhhoo a(n)julee pun vaddaa hae ||

Greet the Holy Saint with your palms pressed together; this is an act of great merit.

 

kir fMfauq punu vfw hy ]1] rhwau ]

kar dda(n)ddouth pun vaddaa hae ||1|| rehaao ||

Bow down before Him; this is a virtuous action indeed. ||1||Pause||

funny, despite some read sohila sahib before they go bed, it clearly shows we dont actually understand bani.

i rest my case

gustaphi maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

understanding Baani Kandola bro is different for everyone. While you read Baani and think that Baani is saying bow before Saints, I would say that it means bow to people who attach you to Akaal Purakh. Saints in Gurbaani are those who dedicate their lives to Nirankaar and those who inspire others to do Naam Simran and Bhagti of Akaal. For Sikhs Akaal is Shabad Guru, Our holy saint is Shabad Guru. So if a "holy person" doesn't attach you to Shabad Guru and Akaal, then what is the point in bowing to him or her?

I'm not saying your wrong, I'm just saying that telling people they don't understand Baani is a bit wrong because depending on one's level of spirituality, difefrent iterpretations will be understood. It is only with Waaheguru's kirpa that one understands Akaal Purakh's Shabad.

fateh Singh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use