Jump to content

Snatanis Got Proper Reply


AKJ Chandigarh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest militant singh

DETAH2 NIDDAR SINGH AND CRU ALONG WID DEM FAKE NIHANGS GET OUTTA HAZUR SAHIB AND STOP UR HINDU RITUALS AND SO CALLED SACRAFICES --KHALISTAN ZINDABAD DETAH 2 INDIA NEAV 4GET 1984 WHERE WAS NIDDAR AND HIS CRU DEN -SMOKIN WEED AND DRINKIN ALCOHOL- DEATH2 EM SUPORTIVE OF TTHE INDIAN GOVT THEY CUSS BHINDRAWALE AND ALL THE SHAHEEDS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

namstang gets along with everyone what a great guy :@

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DETAH2 NIDDAR SINGH AND CRU ALONG WID DEM FAKE NIHANGS GET OUTTA HAZUR SAHIB AND STOP UR HINDU RITUALS AND SO CALLED SACRAFICES --KHALISTAN ZINDABAD DETAH 2 INDIA NEAV 4GET 1984 WHERE WAS NIDDAR AND HIS CRU DEN -SMOKIN WEED AND DRINKIN ALCOHOL- DEATH2 EM SUPORTIVE OF TTHE INDIAN GOVT THEY CUSS BHINDRAWALE AND ALL THE SHAHEEDS

140551[/snapback]

you are another wanne be kharkho on the internet.. if you got soo much bir ras in you may be you should physically go out there and try your best to kick out hazoori singhs of sachkhand hazoor sahib, you will probably end up in godavari river where your fellow neo sikhs and your british freinds ended up ..lol

Here is what amrit pal singh amrit (hazoori singh) says to people like you:

Dear brother,

There are many points in Sri Hazuri Maryada, which I think are not 'Gurmat', but in any situation, I cannot show respect for those, who do not show respect for Hazuri sevadaars. They (Hazuri Sevadar) are more beloved of Guru Gobind Singh Ji than any of such 'Nindak'.

Before critcizing Hazuri Prampra, they should know the facts given in our old texts. Punjabi Sikhs have no right to critcise Hazuri Prampra. First of all, they should maintain 'Gurmat' maryada in Sri Darbar Sahib, Sri Amritsar Sahib Ji, where they do not say 'Bole So Nihaal, Sat Sri Akaal' during Ardas.  Is the head granthi of Sri Darbar Sahib Ji a Brahman, who does not say Bole So Nihaal? 

These 'scholars' should know history of Brahmanism. They will find out many interesting points.

I make a request to such people that they should read the 'Shabd' of 'Gaganmai Thaal'. It is clear from their views that they have not read this 'Shabd'. Instead spending time on 'dumaalas' and 'cholas', they should listen 'Katha' of Gurbani. Shaanti Vi Milegi te Akal Vi Aayegi.

Well, I have already made some of my points clear: - http://www.amritworld.com/hazooree_maryada...k_adhiyain.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

In the article I’ve argued not that blue is “an acceptable colour”, I’ve argued it is more than just acceptable, it was the special Khalsa colour.

My comment on the Singh from Poonch, according to Amardeep Singh “should in fact indicate that the Khalsa’s primary colour is Green, not blue – why does Balpreet Singh suddenly forget this new found fact? “

Unless one has serious intellectual impairment, I think it was clear that I have argued that for Muslims in the Kashmir area, neela means green. This is not the case for Sikh writers.

“Bhai Sukha Singh, it appears is someone that Balpreet Singh is not too familiar with. Bhai Sukha Singh, if we deviate for a moment, was the Granthi at Sri Keshgarh Sahib and also a valiant warrior who also participated in battle”

A cursory look at any article on Sukha Singh will tell you that he was the author of a number of spurious works he tried to pass off as the writings of Guru Gobind Singh. He is not exactly a respectable figure in Sikh literature. The fact you see it fit to valorise him says a lot for your ideology.

Amardeep Singh finishes off,

“Bhai Balpreet Singh Jee is entitled to his belief that Blue received special preference, however he has shown no primary evidence to support this case, so as such it remains an opinion, to which of course we are all entitled. “

Nice. First Amardeep Singh said I was trying to show that blue was “acceptable” now he himself admits I was trying to show it was special. Whether I made a convincing case or not is of course up to individual readers, but I feel there is little doubt it was.

I find "critiques" like this somewhat funny because they try to pass off a more or less empty argument as intelligent commentary. My point was clear but perhaps the reader's processing was a bit muddled?

At any rate, it's a good try at a rebuttal, but I don't think it was all that successful.

My point was that blue is the special Khalsa colour. I think any reader can see the evidence supports this assertion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use