Snatanis Got Proper Reply

[Guest militant singh]

DETAH2 NIDDAR SINGH AND CRU ALONG WID DEM FAKE NIHANGS GET OUTTA HAZUR SAHIB AND STOP UR HINDU RITUALS AND SO CALLED SACRAFICES --KHALISTAN ZINDABAD DETAH 2 INDIA NEAV 4GET 1984 WHERE WAS NIDDAR AND HIS CRU DEN -SMOKIN WEED AND DRINKIN ALCOHOL- DEATH2 EM SUPORTIVE OF TTHE INDIAN GOVT THEY CUSS BHINDRAWALE AND ALL THE SHAHEEDS

[N30S1NGH]

teekaa singh santali sian,

i got no problem with your post in specific since you were giving references, but when i saw sarbloh geeza post.. i had to post since points was already adressed on sikhawareness forum... his post surely opened another chapter of ragmalla debate.

[International Akaali]

namstang gets along with everyone what a great guy

[N30S1NGH]

DETAH2 NIDDAR SINGH AND CRU ALONG WID DEM FAKE NIHANGS GET OUTTA HAZUR SAHIB AND STOP UR HINDU RITUALS AND SO CALLED SACRAFICES --KHALISTAN ZINDABAD DETAH 2 INDIA NEAV 4GET 1984 WHERE WAS NIDDAR AND HIS CRU DEN -SMOKIN WEED AND DRINKIN ALCOHOL- DEATH2 EM SUPORTIVE OF TTHE INDIAN GOVT THEY CUSS BHINDRAWALE AND ALL THE SHAHEEDS

140551[/snapback]

you are another wanne be kharkho on the internet.. if you got soo much bir ras in you may be you should physically go out there and try your best to kick out hazoori singhs of sachkhand hazoor sahib, you will probably end up in godavari river where your fellow neo sikhs and your british freinds ended up ..lol

Here is what amrit pal singh amrit (hazoori singh) says to people like you:

Dear brother,

There are many points in Sri Hazuri Maryada, which I think are not 'Gurmat', but in any situation, I cannot show respect for those, who do not show respect for Hazuri sevadaars. They (Hazuri Sevadar) are more beloved of Guru Gobind Singh Ji than any of such 'Nindak'.

Before critcizing Hazuri Prampra, they should know the facts given in our old texts. Punjabi Sikhs have no right to critcise Hazuri Prampra. First of all, they should maintain 'Gurmat' maryada in Sri Darbar Sahib, Sri Amritsar Sahib Ji, where they do not say 'Bole So Nihaal, Sat Sri Akaal' during Ardas.  Is the head granthi of Sri Darbar Sahib Ji a Brahman, who does not say Bole So Nihaal? 

These 'scholars' should know history of Brahmanism. They will find out many interesting points.

I make a request to such people that they should read the 'Shabd' of 'Gaganmai Thaal'. It is clear from their views that they have not read this 'Shabd'. Instead spending time on 'dumaalas' and 'cholas', they should listen 'Katha' of Gurbani. Shaanti Vi Milegi te Akal Vi Aayegi.

Well, I have already made some of my points clear: - http://www.amritworld.com/hazooree_maryada...k_adhiyain.html

[ms514]

Sat Sri Akal:

Namastang Sahib, are you gaining something by calling your brothers who were bestowed Amrit the same way you were Malech?

Singh Sahib, perhaps you missed this article:

http://www.amritworld.com/sanatani/malechh.pdf

[N30S1NGH]

you are right, i shouldn't have used that word...let me edit my post... i have a habit of getting carried away..my whole life expereinces is being dealing with people like miltant singh (wanna be kharkho's.)

[ms514]

Sat Sri Akal:

Sahib, you should have realized by now that the only reason for my existence is to torment you...

(snickers and runs away to the safety of his computer... ).

[Surajsingh]

S. Amritpal Singh " Amrit" has added two updates. Please have a look at following pages.

http://www.amritworld.com/gallery/book_release.html

http://www.amritworld.com/nihangs/comments...rdeepsingh.html

[Mintu]

So how do you like him in pants-shirt? (He now wears only Kurta-Pajama).

[Singh132]

In the article I’ve argued not that blue is “an acceptable colour”, I’ve argued it is more than just acceptable, it was the special Khalsa colour.

My comment on the Singh from Poonch, according to Amardeep Singh “should in fact indicate that the Khalsa’s primary colour is Green, not blue – why does Balpreet Singh suddenly forget this new found fact? “

Unless one has serious intellectual impairment, I think it was clear that I have argued that for Muslims in the Kashmir area, neela means green. This is not the case for Sikh writers.

“Bhai Sukha Singh, it appears is someone that Balpreet Singh is not too familiar with. Bhai Sukha Singh, if we deviate for a moment, was the Granthi at Sri Keshgarh Sahib and also a valiant warrior who also participated in battle”

A cursory look at any article on Sukha Singh will tell you that he was the author of a number of spurious works he tried to pass off as the writings of Guru Gobind Singh. He is not exactly a respectable figure in Sikh literature. The fact you see it fit to valorise him says a lot for your ideology.

Amardeep Singh finishes off,

“Bhai Balpreet Singh Jee is entitled to his belief that Blue received special preference, however he has shown no primary evidence to support this case, so as such it remains an opinion, to which of course we are all entitled. “

Nice. First Amardeep Singh said I was trying to show that blue was “acceptable” now he himself admits I was trying to show it was special. Whether I made a convincing case or not is of course up to individual readers, but I feel there is little doubt it was.

I find "critiques" like this somewhat funny because they try to pass off a more or less empty argument as intelligent commentary. My point was clear but perhaps the reader's processing was a bit muddled?

At any rate, it's a good try at a rebuttal, but I don't think it was all that successful.

My point was that blue is the special Khalsa colour. I think any reader can see the evidence supports this assertion.