Jump to content

Snatanis Got Proper Reply


AKJ Chandigarh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I just finished reading Amardeep Singh's reply to Balpreet Singh Jee. He seems very disrespectful towards Balpreet Singh for no apparent reason because reading Bhai Balpreet Singh Jee's post he seemed respectful to Amrit Bhaji. I'm a little surprised that Bhai Amrit has posted such a post on his website. Amardeep Singh just seems to have a little sophisticated english rather than any real scholarly critique to Bhai Balpreet Singhs post.

Perhaps Bhai Amardeep Singh Jee should do a little more research on puraatan sources rather than writing sarcastically witty comments which seem to indicate his impolite behavior as a debater, neither do I see him refuting Bhai Balpreet Singh with puraatan sources. My suggestion to Amardeep Singh is to debate using real primary sources, rather than his personal ideology. Arguments based on ideology can only take you so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a little surprised that Bhai Amrit has posted such a post on his website.

Are you not surprised that Bhai Amrit Ji has posted posts which are full of insult towards himself? Read posts by Malwe da sher: http://www.amritworld.com/your_comments.html

These posts say:

Why should people wait for your study? your study is biased and based on your own use of facts, interpratations and personal beliefs. for one who has spent time with nihang singhs there is no need to consult biased studies.

Just because you are an academic who can debate you are not a lion. thats the most bull i have ever heard, calling some1 a giddar becoz they debate at street level rather than academic. Aimay avday aap no sher banonda firda.

lol u call urself an academic? u claim to be a scholar? what shitty analysis. you take one persons opinion and apply that to a wider community. That highlights how biased u are in ur generalisation. one of the principle rule of social science : dont over generalise.

Yet our great elite scholar 'amrit' takes the writings of one person (who he knows NOTHING about) and attempts to apply it to everyone. How do u know CA associates with nihangs? he could be blagging. To make such a comment is shameful and absolutely pathetic. doesnt say much for ur academic abilities.

I have briefly had a look at some of the stuff on your website, while I was very impressed with your research; I only read a few of the articles briefly so don’t assume I will look at your study. I feel discussing maters with people who preserve the maryada is a better way of learning than consulting academics work. Your generalisation comment portrayed perfectly how irrationally some academics can think.

If Bha ji can add insulting remarks against himself, what is there surprising if he has added intelligent post by Amardeep Singh?

Sardar Balpreet Singh blamed Bhai Sukha Singh Ji falsely. If Bhai Amardeep Singh has replied proving Balpreet Singh wrong, how does it become sarcasism or disrespectful? In fact Sardar Balpreet Singh was disresprectful towards Bhai Sukha Singh. Don't you think Sardar Balpreet Singh should apologise to the Sangat?

Bhai Amrit has added insulting comments. It shows that he is bighearted. Malwe da sher made these comments on sikhawareness forum. Bhai Amrit is moderator there. He did not delete this comments there, though he could. He has the right to delete such comments as a moderator. But he did not.

Well, no other moderator on sikhawareness cared to delete those insulting comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use