Osho's Books

[DivineJourney]

hey its not ek omnkar.. its IK OANGKAR no?? heres a katha by giani takhur singh ji from taksaal.. someone has bin posting the katha on this forum..

137876[/snapback]

Rajneesh himself got it wrong! You are totally right It Oan not OM ... people just want to propagate that Sikhi is just another sect of Hinduism. However, Rajneesh interpretation and understanding of Japji Sahib is excellent even though slight contradictions of interpretation here and there on his part.

137891[/snapback]

Time n Again this chap in his lecturers CLAIMED to have EXPERIENCED the whole thing not just mere Academic understanding/knowledge or bookish stuff.

[simer_169]

i have also listening his name for last some years but don't know who he is. so please some senior person should guide us about this....

[The Khalsa Fauj]

can u plz state oshos full name and is he still alive, if not what happened to him just curious because the name ringhs a bell but me nt quite sure who he was or is

137669[/snapback]

me too doent know much bout this man...but as far as i know bout him He is nomore now...his full name was Rajneesh Chandar Mohan he became a lecturer in Gujrat University after doing his P.Hd in felosophy coz he was a great teacher ppl started calling him Acharya(teacher) Rajneesh...later when lotta ppl gatherd around him specially the westener then ppl fondly started calling him.. Bhagwaan Shri Rajneesh and then he later in his life changed his name to Osho (drived frm world ocean).

"Suraj Kiran mili, Jal ka Jal hua raam joti Jot rali, Sampooran Thia raam"

137816[/snapback]

How do you know he got mukat?

Who gave you permission to use this Gurbani tukh for him?

Kirpaa Kurkay Kush Sharam kro!

Like I said before, choose one side. GurSikhi or Usho! Stop calling usho Bhagwan! if he had had any spiritual gian, he wouldn't have allowed open s. intercourse.

[Gupt daasan daas]

some people may have lots of gian

but inside there full of panj dooths

some people wear maalas, have thilak, they think this is jus a game

they kno nothing of the truth

many of us dont

only a gurmukh immersed in naam and vaheguru knows the truth

osho was not bhagwaan, and if he did encoyurage anbs say the stuff ive read, he is a false saint, a thug like saint, like the ones in beneares describes by bhagath kabir je

bhula chuka maf

[International Akaali]

some people may have lots of gian

but inside there full of panj dooths

some people wear maalas, have thilak, they think this is jus a game

they kno nothing of the truth

many of us dont

only a gurmukh immersed in naam and vaheguru knows the truth

osho was not bhagwaan, and if he did encoyurage anbs say the stuff ive read, he is a false saint, a thug like saint, like the ones in beneares describes by bhagath kabir je

bhula chuka maf

138214[/snapback]

agree

[Pheena]

hey its not ek omnkar.. its IK OANGKAR no?? heres a katha by giani takhur singh ji from taksaal.. someone has bin posting the katha on this forum..

137876[/snapback]

Rajneesh himself got it wrong! You are totally right It Oan not OM ... people just want to propagate that Sikhi is just another sect of Hinduism. However, Rajneesh interpretation and understanding of Japji Sahib is excellent even though slight contradictions of interpretation here and there on his part.

137891[/snapback]

No one is propogating anything. Oankar is another manifestation of OM or vice-versa, as is Omni(potent). It is as universal as is Gravity. If newton found Gravity it does not mean it belonged to the western civilization or Christianity. If the Rishis discovered this Duni, it does not mean it belongs to them ie: hinduism. It is a universal dicovery which belongs to everyone. To Guru Nanak Dev ji, it was revealed as Oankar, not Omkar.

Let us Stop discriminating and let the dicovery be equally potent and sacred in its own identity and realization.

Can anyone here Translate both Omkar and Oankar and tell me where does this universal Dhuni becomes Hindu and Sikh?