Jump to content

Galloway On Lebanon


singh_comradz
 Share

Recommended Posts

lol galoway seems to have killed it

"do you think israel is winning?! lookk at the screen on the side.. if that's success what is failure?!"

Its not all muslims that r terrorists, America should be at war with Terrorists not muslims!

exactly, like we were against Mughal terrorists not Muslims!!

Remember Sheikh Fareed is a Muslim!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Bass Singh

VJKK VJKF!

People need to realise that the world is not againt muslims, its against terrorists! people who do unlawful tings, blowing up innocent people, that is stupid!!

How do we not know that george bush is not a terrorist! Undercover!loooooooooooooooooooooooooooool!

VJKK VJKF!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Galloway is an absolute <banned word filter activated>!!!

He is represents everything that was wrong in the past about the Left Wing. I am proud to call my self a Socialist and a Left Winger, but this prat is just plain moronic.

Ok I disagree with somethings that Tony Blair has done, but generally I think he has been beneficial to the UK. Galloway, however, went on record saying that it would be OK for Islamic Terrorist to blow up Tony Blair................I mean how sick is that.

The whole of the Middle East crisis is down to the ideoligy that my religion is better than the rest.........for this Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all to blame..............however at the moment the Islamic extremists seem to be taking it to the nth degree.

Just on a side note, those missiles that Hezbollah are firing at Israel.............guess who supplied them.....yes....our friend Saddam Hussain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Galloway is a complete <banned word filter activated>! He was Saddam's best friend and never raised his voice when Saddam was killing thousands of people and was actually shown on TV praising him. He only got elected because Muslims will elect any muppet who talks on their behalf as they perceive that the war is against their religion and not terrorism. He used to represent a seat in Scotland but moved to one is east London because it is a Muslim area.

The problem is that his idea of an interview is to stick to one point and basically shout that point at the interviewer. He said in the interview that Israel did not leave all of Lebanon in 2000 so that's why Hazbollah is attacking Israel. He's wrong, the UN certified that israel had left all of Lebanese territory in 2000 so there is no case for Hazbollah to be attacking Israel. They interviewer seemed to hold her own and at one stage shouting at the <banned word filter activated> to let her finish her question.

As for Israel getting a beating, Isreal has lost about 40 troops and killed in excess of 400 Hazbollah terrorists. Hardly a beating?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if israel wins this battle, do u know what will happen?every kid in lebanon will become a human bomb and will be ready to destroy israel. The israeli's dont think, they just went in and started their thing. After the israeli's are done killing some main leaders of hezbollah there is gonna be a big war not juts a small war. The people in lebanon support hezzbollah or hamas in palestine and they are ready to die for them. Even though israel will win this battle, the real terror will be seen by israel after they are done. The israeli's need to plan what to do after they win this small battle becasue hamas and hezbollah are like brothers.

Galloway is a complete <banned word filter activated>! He was Saddam's best friend and never raised his voice when Saddam was killing thousands of people and was actually shown on TV praising him. He only got elected because Muslims will elect any muppet who talks on their behalf as they perceive that the war is against their religion and not terrorism. He used to represent a seat in Scotland but moved to one is east London because it is a Muslim area.

The problem is that his idea of an interview is to stick to one point and basically shout that point at the interviewer. He said in the interview that Israel did not leave all of Lebanon in 2000 so that's why Hazbollah is attacking Israel. He's wrong, the UN certified that israel had left all of Lebanese territory in 2000 so there is no case for Hazbollah to be attacking Israel. They interviewer seemed to hold her own and at one stage shouting at the <banned word filter activated> to let her finish her question.

As for Israel getting a beating, Isreal has lost about 40 troops and killed in excess of 400 Hazbollah terrorists. Hardly a beating?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Khalsaforce

>>if israel wins this battle, do u know what will happen?every kid in lebanon will become a human bomb<<

Yeah rite! If they're so into becoming human bombs then how comes they are running around getting the media to take photos and videos of how they are 'suffering'. They're even staging photos to try and get the best propaganda value. Don't believe every rhetoric you hear from Hazbollah or Muslims. Suicide bombing is overrated, no side has ever won a war that used suicide bombers. The Japanese tried it in WW2 but they didn't win. The Palestinians tried it and all Israel had to do is build a wall and these bombings have all but stopped.

>>The israeli's need to plan what to do after they win this small battle becasue hamas and hezbollah are like brothers.<<

Only because they see a common Jewish enemy, once the war is over the Shi'ites and Sunnis will go back to bombing the shyt out of each other like they are doing in Iraq. Just yesterday Sunnis killed over 30 Shias outside they're holiest shrine.

As for Israel getting a beating, Isreal has lost about 40 troops and killed in excess of 400 Hazbollah terrorists. Hardly a beating?

corection 400 civilians.

all hezbollah ppl are lebanese.. but all lebanese are not hezbollah.

Amazingly Hazbollah only ever admitted to ONE casualty amongst their members!! Most of the Hazbollah getting killed are shown up as civilians to get propaganda value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use