To All Those Who Oppose Khalistan

[guptveer1469]

2 Centuries ago, when Sikhs where just in thousands they ruled from Delhi to Peshawer. Now when Sikhs are 19 Million (only counting Indian Sikhs) why can't they just rule from Delhi to Amritsar?

The religious population demography of the Sikh Empire (Maharaja Ranjit Singh) was Muslim (60%), Hindu (25%) and Sikh (15%).

Khalistan will have something like this Sikh (50%), Hindu (45%), Muslim (5%).

Now the prime minister of India is a so-called Sikh who married his daughters to Hindus... But then again, a Sikh is ruling a country where Sikhs are a minority... Just 1.9% of the total population! Then why cant Sikhs rule if they will be 50% of the total population of Khalistan.

Just trying to explain some Singhs brothers/sisters that Khalistan could be run by Sikhs,

Bhul Chuk Maaf Karni

Fateh

[malkeet]

1. the indian army in 2002 had 980 000 active soldiers, with an army reserve of 300,000 first line troops, and 500000 second line troops.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/army.htm

they are all highly trained, and have advanced weoponry, communications etc. ok theres 19million sikhs, the majority cant fight. Arent trained in warfare. sikhs are 1.9% of the population, do you think the other 98.1% will just let us take punjab?

It is impossible to get khalistan through force. The only way i can see it happening is through political means, and international support. Yet we all know how corrupt the sikh politicians are so this isnt going to happen any time soon.

[jayd]

Just trying to explain some Singhs brothers/sisters that Khalistan could be run by Sikhs,

Absolutely

The religious population demography of the Sikh Empire (Maharaja Ranjit Singh) was Muslim (60%), Hindu (25%) and Sikh (15%).

Khalistan will have something like this Sikh (50%), Hindu (45%), Muslim (5%).

Now the prime minister of India is a so-called Sikh who married his daughters to Hindus

Maharaja Ranjit Singh had Muslim wives. What's your point?

To all who are for Khalistan, we don't deserve it, because we have become too comfortable in the west. We are too soft or proud to work in our own fields, while our elders are waiting for bhaiyeea to work in the fields. Shame on us:

Go toil in the fields of Punjab first, and then ask for khalistan. Until then, sit down or you'll hurt your back. Its much easier shouting slogans and stirring the pot sitting from the west. maar dheyo, wadd dheyo !! But, as soon as the fire is in our own backyard here (eg: birmingham), we are talking about peace, cooler minds, understanding etc. What hypocrisy !!!

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070620/punjab1.htm#16

Farmers await labourers

Manish Sirhindi

Tribune News Service

Rajpura, June 19

Farmers in the state are finding it hard to even cultivate the paddy crop this season as the number of labourers coming from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar have dwindled.

Farmers from various parts of the state can be seen making a beeline outside the Rajpura railway station in order to get hold of migrant labourers arriving here. Some of the farmers are camping at the railway station for the past couple of days in hope of hiring them. Harkesh Singh, one of the farmers from Mehbobpur village, said he had been coming to the railway station twice a day to hire the labourers, but had not been able to hire anyone in the past two days.

To cultivate one acre four labourers are needed. Many farmers with acres of land have not been able to get even a single labourer this sowing season. Brothers Harjinder Singh and Narinder Singh, who own 20 acres at Sural Kalan village, said even as the pre-monsoon has hit the region and the season was ripe to sow the paddy, they had not been able to cultivate their land.

The reason being given for this shortage is that with the Bihar government starting several development projects in the state and the guaranteed employment scheme of the Union government, most of the labourers have found jobs in their home towns.

Punjabi landlords are reluctant to hire local Dalit labourers as they charge more and their output is less as compared to those from Bihar.

As of today there are at least 40 farmers waiting at the Rajpura railway station, while only five to six labourers are arriving here each day.

With each passing day the farmers are becoming more and more apprehensive about incurring huge losses as late sowing of paddy can lead to low yields. Karamvir Singh of Mardapur village said it was almost impossible to cultivate the fields without migrant labourers. “In case we do not get them, the season can prove to be a disaster for us,” he lamented.

[Guest Narinder Singh]

Most Jews reside outside of Isreal, they're not "toiling" in their homeland.

On the other hand, most Sikhs reside in Punjab, yet they dont "deserve" khalistan. :umm:

Fateh.

[jai_ho]

1. the indian army in 2002 had 980 000 active soldiers, with an army reserve of 300,000 first line troops, and 500000 second line troops.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/army.htm

they are all highly trained, and have advanced weoponry, communications etc. ok theres 19million sikhs, the majority cant fight. Arent trained in warfare. sikhs are 1.9% of the population, do you think the other 98.1% will just let us take punjab?

It is impossible to get khalistan through force. The only way i can see it happening is through political means, and international support. Yet we all know how corrupt the sikh politicians are so this isnt going to happen any time soon.

....y indra agrred to punjabi suba, because sikhs saved india from pakistan in 1971.

..the hindu solders were reportly ran into sugercan fields to hid

..i also belive that khalistan should be achevd through political means, for various resons

..but the indian army is only good at killing its on people. once khalistan is made india can have millions in the army

they wont dare to sneeze (i belve the border with wont be guarded)

[Guest Dancing Warrior]

The Land of the free where Gender selection by female foeticide is most rampant and will continue to be so what ever you call the parched nation.

Some knob dresses up like Guru Gobind Singh Ji and the whole Sikh nation goes mad yet their neighbours continue at an alarming rate killing their unborn daughters.

Which one do you think Guru Ji would be most repulsed by?

Some <banned word filter activated> dressed up?, or his Sikhs killing their daughters?

[jassa]

its time to change ardas ....

sri nankana sahib sri patna sahib sach khand sri hajjor sahib jinna toon panth nu vichoreya geya hai khoole darshan diddar seva sambal da daan appne khalse nu baksho ....

[guptveer1469]

haha jassa u anti sikh rss agent

stop!!

first let us get khalistan then we'ill conquer whole of india

COZ delhi and punjab : backbone of india

once we have them

india = dead!!

[jassa]

lol .... yeah i m bajrang dal RSS member .... keep it a secret .... and hows climate in pakistan buddy ....

there was a meeting going of some internet warriors in yahoo room ....

Mr x . Lets get punjab out of india

Mr y . ok we will do it but then how will we lead punjab to prosperity

Mr x . we will attack america in return america will attack us and get victory over us and include us in their kingdom and will lead us to prosperity

Mr y . hmmmm but what if we win america

[singhalicious]

2 Centuries ago, when Sikhs where just in thousands they ruled from Delhi to Peshawer. Now when Sikhs are 19 Million (only counting Indian Sikhs) why can't they just rule from Delhi to Amritsar?

The religious population demography of the Sikh Empire (Maharaja Ranjit Singh) was Muslim (60%), Hindu (25%) and Sikh (15%).

Khalistan will have something like this Sikh (50%), Hindu (45%), Muslim (5%).

Now the prime minister of India is a so-called Sikh who married his daughters to Hindus... But then again, a Sikh is ruling a country where Sikhs are a minority... Just 1.9% of the total population! Then why cant Sikhs rule if they will be 50% of the total population of Khalistan.

Just trying to explain some Singhs brothers/sisters that Khalistan could be run by Sikhs,

Bhul Chuk Maaf Karni

Fateh

- Sikhs are an integral part of India!

- Sikhs and Hindus get on very well most of the time its just the fanatics that muk things up

- India is becoming a global super power

- Khalistan would be land locked

- Sikhs would be a bare majority in Khalistan and we cant force all those Hindus to live under Sikh rule, things have changed from 1800's

- We would b like Pakistan- a failed state

- Many more, 1984 is unlikely to happen again!