Jump to content

1699 WITNESS


Akaali
 Share

Recommended Posts

bhai sahib it is 90% likely that mata sahib kaur put the patashae in but trust me not all accounts agree on this. some people say mata jeeto ji put them in..........bt to be honest it doesnt really make a difference........if u are an eyewitness its easy to make a lil mistake in such a big event

ill copy this from sikhnet (written by "serjinder singh"):

This account is a later interpolation. Original and authentic account is by the official chronicler of the Mughal court and is in a published document Muasar-i-Alamgiri. The account refers to 60000 to 70000 people gathered in Anandpur. It does not deal with the miracle story of reviving Panj Piaras. It certainly mentions the refusal of the Brahmins and Kashatryas to take Amrit and eat together with lower castes. Miracle stories generally are the first signs of possible concoction wherever we come across these. In this case, the mention of the villages in Punjab to which some of the Payaras are reported to belong makes it suspicious. For instance, the village Nangal Shahidan acquired its name as Shahidan in the eighteenth century when the concept and tradition of Singh Shaheeds got firmly established in rural Punjab following the martyrdom of so many Singhs. How come it was called Nangal Shaheedan in 1699 according to this report long before the Singh Shaheeds.

also i have heard that no such document even exists at aligarh uni.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

ohmy.gif Wow. That is a really cool excerpt!!

Its a little different from what I had heard though... I wuz told that Guruji took the panj pyara into the tent before "beheading" them so that no one would see.

Are there any other excepts like this one from other people? I would be interested to see the similiarities to this one!

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bhai sahib khalistani ji i usually agree with you but the writer of guru kian sakhian guessed that this is what happened since it happened inside the tent, plus bhatt sarup singh kaushish was not actually at vaisakhi but compiled the account from the previous bhatt vahi records, perhaps someone who has the older bhatt vahi accounts, could tell us what they say.

the reason i have difficulty accepting this story is because a) all other accounts say it happened inside the tent B) if this really happened then there would be many other accounts talking about it since it would be such a huge thing and c) as mentioned in my earlier post the language and the names used for a particular pind show us that it must have been written much, much later than 1699, and the fact that d) this account doesnt even exist in aligarh university.

i dont have any problem accepting that guru ji beheaded the panj pyare but this account is too different to all the others to be accepted as valid, it is likely in my opinion each of hte panj were beheaded in the tent, then given amrit afterwards. whatever happened in the tent the panj pyare would have kept secret. had this really happened there would be alot more accounts going about of this particular event, and in this case there are none. if the sangat could realise how many fake, interpolated accounts there are running about in sikh history they would realise why i and many others are so cynical of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sat Sri Akal:

Quote:

har a(n)mrith ras paaeiaa muaa jeevaaeiaa fir baahurr maran n hoee ||

Obtaining the Ambrosial Essence of the Lord, the dead are restored to life, and do not die again.

(Guru Raam Daas Ji, Raag Aasaa, 447).

^_^^_^^_^

Another interesting line is from Baba Maan Singh. He noted the stories about the Guru Sahib slaughtering 5 goats. He questions whether Guru Gobind Singh Sahib give the Panth of the Khalsa to the Panj Pyare or the five goats he slaughtered? Surely the Khalsa was bestowed onto those who gave their heads. If the goats gave their heads, it is they who should be called the Khalsa!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use