Jump to content

Nasa Taking The Help Of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji


sewak sikh
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/18/2007 at 6:52 AM, sewak sikh said:

That

You forget centuries before the guru garanth sahib was written greek philosophers already came up with the theory that the earth is round. So has it been after christianity emerged but the church ended up beheading those who aspire to refute christian ideology. Even if it’s the first religious scripture to back the round world up you can also take in account the period where sikhism their fundamentals were laid many philosophers already concluded the earth was round and was certainly not the first one to come up with the round world theory. it is not special if anything. There are too many flaws in anything you conclude and i believe this is straight up a bad case of delusion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
4 hours ago, intrigued said:

They emailed NASA and they do not have a bir of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji https://www.quora.com/Is-Guru-Granth-Sahib-the-Sikh-religious-scripture-kept-in-NASA-library

So they say bro! Hah. Maybe it is Dasam Granth Ji they reference instead. 

And in my opinion references to flat earth were references to a reservation section of a larger planet. Not a flat earth but a flat portion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Nanak Dev ji  explained the birth of our universe stepwise (Arbad Narbad dhundukara ) , that there are countless planets and stars (Patala Patal lakh agasa agas), there is repeated cycles of of big bang and crunch(keh baar pasario pasar) , all well before the first telescope was developed during  the period where the prevailing thoughts on Earth was that it was the centrepoint of the universe and the sun and moon turned orbit around it in the western canon and middle eastern canon. Of course , Guru ji also talked of fish that lived in trees (which detractors thought impossible but is a reality in South American jungle only discovered during eighties ; that there are lifeforms living inside stones and many other natural phenomena which have since been confirmed . I wouldn't worry about the veracity of Guru ji , just be grateful that you have been born in a time where you can listen to his guidance and follow it .

Abrahamics had exposure to the truth but they chose to obscure it to hold onto worldly power under the influence of maya , I wouldn't worry about their confirmation or rubberstamping our Guru ji's truth , But pray that Waheguru ji opens their eyes and minds  again.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2021 at 5:29 AM, jkvlondon said:

Guru Nanak Dev ji  explained the birth of our universe stepwise (Arbad Narbad dhundukara ) , that there are countless planets and stars (Patala Patal lakh agasa agas), there is repeated cycles of of big bang and crunch(keh baar pasario pasar) , all well before the first telescope was developed during  the period where the prevailing thoughts on Earth was that it was the centrepoint of the universe and the sun and moon turned orbit around it in the western canon and middle eastern canon.

Where in Gurbani does it mention anything about a big bang or big crunch. If we would believe in these theories, then we would have also have to believe in the big lie that is evolution and then what? We were formed from monkeys? That humans were less matured before then now? How would that fit in to the system of the the 4 Jugs, where people in Satjug were much more advanced in terms of Dharmic philosophy. It seems that it is backwards, people now are become more ape like then ever.  If we were monkeys, then when did we grow Dasam Duars? And where in Gurbani does Guru Sahib state the Sun is the centre-point of the solar system or that Earth rotates around the Sun. There are 100's of Panktian that reference the Sun and Moon as being "Deevay" just forms of light in the sky. There are also references to "Bhoo-mandal" meaning the Earth as the centre piece of the Universe. If the Sun was the centre of our Solar System as they claim Guru Sahib would have explained this phenomenon and it would have been referred to as "Sooraj-Mandal" which it is not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TatKhalsaa said:

Where in Gurbani does it mention anything about a big bang or big crunch. If we would believe in these theories, then we would have also have to believe in the big lie that is evolution and then what? We were formed from monkeys? That humans were less matured before then now? How would that fit in to the system of the the 4 Jugs, where people in Satjug were much more advanced in terms of Dharmic philosophy. It seems that it is backwards, people now are become more ape like then ever.  If we were monkeys, then when did we grow Dasam Duars? And where in Gurbani does Guru Sahib state the Sun is the centre-point of the solar system or that Earth rotates around the Sun. There are 100's of Panktian that reference the Sun and Moon as being "Deevay" just forms of light in the sky. There are also references to "Bhoo-mandal" meaning the Earth as the centre piece of the Universe. If the Sun was the centre of our Solar System as they claim Guru Sahib would have explained this phenomenon and it would have been referred to as "Sooraj-Mandal" which it is not

Gurbani says all at once. It isn't a big bang but it isn't totally contradictory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TatKhalsaa said:

Where in Gurbani does it mention anything about a big bang or big crunch. If we would believe in these theories, then we would have also have to believe in the big lie that is evolution and then what? We were formed from monkeys? That humans were less matured before then now? How would that fit in to the system of the the 4 Jugs, where people in Satjug were much more advanced in terms of Dharmic philosophy. It seems that it is backwards, people now are become more ape like then ever.  If we were monkeys, then when did we grow Dasam Duars? And where in Gurbani does Guru Sahib state the Sun is the centre-point of the solar system or that Earth rotates around the Sun. There are 100's of Panktian that reference the Sun and Moon as being "Deevay" just forms of light in the sky. There are also references to "Bhoo-mandal" meaning the Earth as the centre piece of the Universe. If the Sun was the centre of our Solar System as they claim Guru Sahib would have explained this phenomenon and it would have been referred to as "Sooraj-Mandal" which it is not

pasarana is to spread /expand , with one sound the universe was created which is a vibration that can still be heard now . To start from unity to the expanse and repeat the cycle then you would have to have death or collecting up of potential mass /force . Sikhi are not christians who cannot fathom other s lifeforms prior to this human domininant one sikhs  KNOW that all life is Akal Purakh and whether we came from a homo erectus prior to now that is not important for a Sikh . Are you seriously saying that Guru Granth Sahib's metaphors should be taken in literal form? are you an ex abrahamic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

pasarana is to spread /expand , with one sound the universe was created which is a vibration that can still be heard now . To start from unity to the expanse and repeat the cycle then you would have to have death or collecting up of potential mass /force . Sikhi are not christians who cannot fathom other s lifeforms prior to this human domininant one sikhs  KNOW that all life is Akal Purakh and whether we came from a homo erectus prior to now that is not important for a Sikh . Are you seriously saying that Guru Granth Sahib's metaphors should be taken in literal form? are you an ex abrahamic?

The Abrahamics I find put man at the centre of everything. 

It is  very solipsistic.

It is the same mindset where they thought that the sun revolves around the earth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use