Jump to content

Applying The Word "sh"


Guest Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

Veer Faujan jee, im not making any assumptions. The fact is that Sant Gurbachan Singh jee tries to prove Gurbani viakaran as being incorrect, however the failure to notice that examples such as Arjan was a noun totally destroys his argument. People like Bhai Vir Singh jee notice this error and mention that words such as Arjan are a noun unlike Band na and therefore Arjan will not be Arj na.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Gurbani is not just 1 language - how can you apply the same grammatical rules to Sanskrit, Marathi, Braj etc?

Gurbani viakaran is the viakaran of gurbani, when looking at others language you are still reading in gurmukhi. For example a sanbodan shabad which ends with oora noo unkar has a bindi on. The oora nu unkar (sanbodan shabad) is the grammitical rule. For example in rehras sahib: Akhha jeeva visrai mar jaoo (bindi) If the sanskit words were written in devanagri then I could understand where you were coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest

Surely Gurmukhi is just the script - Sanskrit grammatical rules should still apply to Sanskrit no matter what script it is written in. Just because the same 'lipi' or script is used to write English and French, it doesn't mean I can apply English grammar rules to French and vice-versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely Gurmukhi is just the script - Sanskrit grammatical rules should still apply to Sanskrit no matter what script it is written in. Just because the same 'lipi' or script is used to write English and French, it doesn't mean I can apply English grammar rules to French and vice-versa.

If words from different language's are added to a line, would we change the whole grammar? For example the words Jungle (used in Baba Farid jees bani) has been bought into english, the word kismat has also been used in English, so because words from other languages have been bought into a system of language, it will not mean that where the word jungle comes into English we will look at punjabi grammar.

Veer jee the reason why people called Guru jee uneducated was because they were looking at punjabi langauge (and its viakaran) rather than gurbani viakaran. Gumukhi is used, however the viakaran is differnt to Punjabi (there are some similarities) for example can you show me where oora noo unkar in sanbodan shabad indicates a bindi in punjabi grammar? Can you tell me what the word ikh with and without an unkar in Punjabi viakrana means? The point is that because a punjabi word is used, it does mean we will look at punjabi grammar, esp when it has no answer. The point of adding the unkar was to indicate that the meanings were different betweeen ikh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use