Jump to content

Dr Zakir Naik Justifying Death For Apostates


Guest SatwantBeantKehar
 Share

Recommended Posts

More than a scholar a student of comparative religion. He can quote from various scriptures.

I saw a Sikh Brother, ask him a question about Guru Nanak at Mecca , he replied with, its possible he went to Mecca, in a chup charp manner (quietly not drawing attention)

Dr Niak didn’t say Guru Nanak was a Muslim.

It was the brother showed himself up in front of a few 100 people when brought up the kaba-moving story.

Dr Niak is highly educated but cunning and sly , like say don’t trust them nor get close to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More than a scholar a student of comparative religion. He can quote from various scriptures.

I saw a Sikh Brother, ask him a question about Guru Nanak at Mecca , he replied with, its possible he went to Mecca, in a chup charp manner (quietly not drawing attention)

Dr Niak didn’t say Guru Nanak was a Muslim.

It was the brother showed himself up in front of a few 100 people when brought up the kaba-moving story.

Dr Niak is highly educated but cunning and sly , like say don’t trust them nor get close to them.

Other than prove that many Sikh guys are dunce when it comes to debate. How did the guy make the brother look dumb?

People should REALLY be careful when using Janam Sakhis as historical evidence. I bet the guy said something like, "if he moved Mecca, how comes no one else noticed?" Muslims place a big thing on miracles like that as evidence of God's presence. Had Guru Nanak really did that, I think many of the people there would have recognised him as a holy man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ older generation of muslims do recognize Guru Nanak Sahib Jee as not just a holy man, but a lot more. Goto Pakistan and talk to any older people :s

I know what you mean but I think this will end in one or two generations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More than a scholar a student of comparative religion. He can quote from various scriptures.

I saw a Sikh Brother, ask him a question about Guru Nanak at Mecca , he replied with, its possible he went to Mecca, in a chup charp manner (quietly not drawing attention)

Dr Niak didn’t say Guru Nanak was a Muslim.

It was the brother showed himself up in front of a few 100 people when brought up the kaba-moving story.

Dr Niak is highly educated but cunning and sly , like say don’t trust them nor get close to them.

Other than prove that many Sikh guys are dunce when it comes to debate. How did the guy make the brother look dumb?

People should REALLY be careful when using Janam Sakhis as historical evidence. I bet the guy said something like, "if he moved Mecca, how comes no one else noticed?" Muslims place a big thing on miracles like that as evidence of God's presence. Had Guru Nanak really did that, I think many of the people there would have recognised him as a holy man.

Dr Niak didn’t make the brother look dumb he did it himself.

I have scene many of Dr Niak talks. I have always wanted a Sikh to ask him a question, and when he did I was cringing.

The Singh pushed in front of people to get to the mic, causing a commotion. Rushed to come out with this.

He was told moving of the Mecca or any other building is Un-scientific, Dr Niak then said lets just suppose it did happen it would be recorded by Islamic historians.

These mircales are always connected with Religous founders in Religion to proove they are men of God.

If Guru Nanak did move the mecca, he would have documented in his writings. Guru Nanak also was against myth mircales.

The verse which is NOT in the SGGS ...goes along something like the whole of mecca was spining.

If anything was spinning it was the peoples mind with whom Guru Ji had debate with when he gave them his answer, "to point my feet to a place where God is not"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More than a scholar a student of comparative religion. He can quote from various scriptures.

I saw a Sikh Brother, ask him a question about Guru Nanak at Mecca , he replied with, its possible he went to Mecca, in a chup charp manner (quietly not drawing attention)

Dr Niak didn’t say Guru Nanak was a Muslim.

It was the brother showed himself up in front of a few 100 people when brought up the kaba-moving story.

Dr Niak is highly educated but cunning and sly , like say don’t trust them nor get close to them.

Other than prove that many Sikh guys are dunce when it comes to debate. How did the guy make the brother look dumb?

People should REALLY be careful when using Janam Sakhis as historical evidence. I bet the guy said something like, "if he moved Mecca, how comes no one else noticed?" Muslims place a big thing on miracles like that as evidence of God's presence. Had Guru Nanak really did that, I think many of the people there would have recognised him as a holy man.

Dr Niak didn’t make the brother look dumb he did it himself.

I have scene many of Dr Niak talks. I have always wanted a Sikh to ask him a question, and when he did I was cringing.

The Singh pushed in front of people to get to the mic, causing a commotion. Rushed to come out with this.

He was told moving of the Mecca or any other building is Un-scientific, Dr Niak then said lets just suppose it did happen it would be recorded by Islamic historians.

These mircales are always connected with Religous founders in Religion to proove they are men of God.

If Guru Nanak did move the mecca, he would have documented in his writings. Guru Nanak also was against myth mircales.

The verse which is NOT in the SGGS ...goes along something like the whole of mecca was spining.

If anything was spinning it was the peoples mind with whom Guru Ji had debate with when he gave them his answer, "to point my feet to a place where God is not"

I like your response. Sadly too many of our own people think that discarding miracles is some sort of insult to Sikhism. It is highly likely that overzealous Sikhs attributed miracles to Gurus, that they themselves did not promote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use