Jump to content

Wjkk Wjkf V/s Sat Shri Akal V/s Others...!


Recommended Posts

wjkk wjkf

daas always think what was the fateh before vaisakhi 1699.... when sings used to meet each other, did thay say "sat shri akal" or "sat kartaar" or "dhan nirankar" or "something else...?"

also, when dasam pita ji has given us "waheguru ji ka khalsa waheguru ji ki fateh" then why it looks like "sat shri akal" has overtaken "waheguru ji ka khalsa wagheguru ji ki fateh"

ppls dont feel shy in saying "sat shri akal" but they feel shy in saying "waheguru ji ka khalsa waheguru ji ki fateh"

any idea or polite views???

thanks

wjkk wjkf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awgy Awvq isMG ju pwvY ] vwihgurU kI Pqy bulwvY ]

aagae aavath si(n)gh j paavai || vaahiguroo kee fathae bulaavai ||

Whenever he sees another Singh approaching at a distance. He greets him with 'Vaheguru Jee Kaa Khalsa! Vaheguru Jee Kee Fatheh!!'

"Sat Sri Akaal" is taken from the Jangee Naraa (War Cry). Sat Sri Akaal is not a greeting between Sikhs. Remembering the Khalsa, it's creator (Vaheguru) and remaining in high spirits is what the Fatheh was given for and why it is the necessary greeting. Most people changed it to "Sat Sri Akaal" because they did not want to take Amrit and hence the world "Khalsa" did not feel appropriate for them. Ask any older person why the Fatheh has faded. It is simply because people drifted away from the basic Rehat of taking Amrit.

Anyone can say Fateh to anyone else. The reason for saying the Fateh was so that it brought you into high spirits and reminded you of Vaheguru and the Khalsa. If you are not Amritdharee it should also ring a few bells!! And no, it is not just for men. Singh is used in the Rehatnama to represent a Sikh of the Guru.

fateh is the way to gooooooooooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awgy Awvq isMG ju pwvY ] vwihgurU kI Pqy bulwvY ]

aagae aavath si(n)gh j paavai || vaahiguroo kee fathae bulaavai ||

Whenever he sees another Singh approaching at a distance. He greets him with 'Vaheguru Jee Kaa Khalsa! Vaheguru Jee Kee Fatheh!!'

"Sat Sri Akaal" is taken from the Jangee Naraa (War Cry). Sat Sri Akaal is not a greeting between Sikhs. Remembering the Khalsa, it's creator (Vaheguru) and remaining in high spirits is what the Fatheh was given for and why it is the necessary greeting. Most people changed it to "Sat Sri Akaal" because they did not want to take Amrit and hence the world "Khalsa" did not feel appropriate for them. Ask any older person why the Fatheh has faded. It is simply because people drifted away from the basic Rehat of taking Amrit.

Anyone can say Fateh to anyone else. The reason for saying the Fateh was so that it brought you into high spirits and reminded you of Vaheguru and the Khalsa. If you are not Amritdharee it should also ring a few bells!! And no, it is not just for men. Singh is used in the Rehatnama to represent a Sikh of the Guru.

fateh is the way to gooooooooooo

Waheguru Ji ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh Waheguru thank u veerji Waheguru

post-5232-1210845935.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol....

its ... sa-si-kal, sa-si-kal, u ok?

lmao!! Thats tooo funny!!

And Techno Singh, amazing post!!!! im going to print it out and stick it around my Gurdwara!!!! Absolutely amazing!!

Itz amazing how distant from Rehat people are!! Nearly every1 i know doesnt even know what Sats Ria Kal means!!! It used to be the greatest War Cry ever!! BOLESONIHAAAL..... SATSRIAKAAAAAL. Now it is just being "dumbed" down by stupid punjabis. The bhangra artist "dr zues" has made a song titled "Sats Ria Kal" that people dance to at weddings when they get tottaly hammered. Thats how distant every1 is from Sikhiii!!!!!!

If someone says Satsriakal to you, you should tell them that it is a War Cry and only half of it, and if they still want to carry on using it, then they must say Bolesonihal Satsriakal while greetin sum1!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use