Jump to content

Marijuana And Nihangs


tec9
 Share

Recommended Posts

jagbir singh so called babbar, i suppose we are also living in a "kookoo land" for believing that the chote sahibzade of 5 and 8 gave up their lives instead of having their hair cut, along with countless other shaheed singhs and singhnis?

It is not about Guroo Sahib's forgiving nature, it is about the chardikalaa of Maharaj's sikhs, who cared about thier guroo more than their lives. To suggest that they would commit a kurehit to save their lives is sayign that they valued their lives over thier Guroo.

Satguroo is dayal yes, if he is dayal enough to forgive, then he is dayal enough to make a sikh bear the unbearable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shastr

people, u guys are just talking crap. execpt for the guy that talked about the power of bani, that was the only post that made sence.

that video says the bhang is for bir raas and stuff right? so you could be tyar par tyar. well yea, thats a bunch of crap. guru ji tells us in chandi chritar, that those u want the nasha of bir raas, all they have to do is read this bani. all they have to do is do the simran, do that jaap, and they will get that nasha.

and jassa bhaji, u said something about putting the paste of bhang on ur your leg or something, well yea, thats stupid too. cuz buddy if u had naam inside of you, there is no need for anythign else. if u had that avasta of baba deep singh, who got his head cut off, but wat kept him going? THE 101 JAP JI SAHIBS THAT HE DID AS NITNEM!! we just dont have that sharda inside of us to reach that level, so we will never know the true power of bani. those who have bani inside of them do not feel pain, they do not feel hot or cold, they dont care even if they have to sit on the hot plate, they dont care even if they have to sit in boiling water, they dont care even if they have to get their head cut off, they dont care if they have to stand between bricked walls. with bani, all those things dont matter, becasue akal purkh will be inside of you, and the only thing u feel is his love. the only pain u feel is the pain of akals love, the only hot or cold u feel is that of akal. first we must reach that level, cuz there is nothing like the nasha of bani. bhang is just a joke, thats a distraction. and the poeple who do it, cant get off their addiction to it, so they say, "oh its guru ji's parshad" and too bad that same guru ji gave us his bani as his saroop. we read bani, guru ji will not only be with us, guru ji will be in us!!

and to tec9 bhaji, lol, u say sikhi is not a religoin? lmao are u joking buddy? "sikh ek vakri kaum eh" the words of sant jarnail singh ji(who's nitnem was 151 jap ji sahibs)...... and here u are, obviously some bigtime bhramgiani or something who thinks sikhi is not even a religion. wake up man. wake up!

at the end of the day, if u are a guru ka sikh, ur head should be at charan of guru granth sahib ji.

SO TO THOSE PEOPLE WHO THINK DOING MARIJUWANA, EATING MEAT, AND DRINKING IS A PART OF SIKHI, I SUGGEST YOU DO LOVELY PARKASH OF GURU JI, AND GO TO ANG 1377, READ SALOK #233, AND READ IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN!!!!

GURU JI TELL US:

Kabeer, those mortals who consume marijuana, fish and wine

no matter what pilgrimages, fasts and rituals they follow, they will all go to hell. 233.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here is what akhal thakt has to say on the matter of meat: also remember that is never been questioned thats singhs in times of war used marijuana and Guruji premitted this. I am not saying it is right to use these today for social use but it is allowed in times of war.

Misconceptions About Eating Meat

by Sandeep Singh Brarrkhanda.gif

The view of Sikhism is that eating meat or abstaining from it is the individuals choice. A Sikh is considered no lesser or greater a Sikh if they eat meat or are a vegetarian.

Final Ruling from Akal Takht

The Akal Takht represents the final authority on controversial issues concerning the Sikh Panth, in this regard the issue of meat eating has been settled. Hukamnama issued by Akal Takht Jathedar Sandhu Singh Bhaura dated February 15th 1980 that Amritdhari Sikhs can eat meat as long as it is jhatka meat and that eating meat does not go against the code of conduct, Kurehit, of the Sikhs. Thus a Sikh cannot be excommunicated for eating meat.

ball_o.gif The Times of the Gurus

ball_o.gifThe Bani of Guru Nanak on Meat and Vegetarianism

ball_o.gif Quotes from Sri Guru Granth Sahib

ball_o.gif The Comments of Sikh Scholars Regarding Meat

The Sikh Reht Maryada (The Official Code of Conduct)

An Amritdhari Khalsa Sikh is not allowed to eat the meat of an animal slaughtered the Muslim way.

In Punjabi the word "Kuttha" specifically means meat prepared according to the Muslim ritual slaughter.

Punjabi-English Dictionary, Punjabi University, Dept. of Punjabi Lexicography, Published Dec. 1994. "Kuttha: meat of animal or fowl slaughtered slowly as prescribed by Islamic law."

Punjabi English Dictionary, Singh Bros., Amritsar "Kuttha: Tortured, killed according to Mohammedan law."

What is Jhatka Meat and Why?

Jhatka meat is meat in which the animal has been killed quickly without suffering or religious ritual.

Sikhism, A Complete Introduction, Dr. H.S.Singha & Satwant Kaur, Hemkunt Press

We must give the rationale behind prescribing jhatka meat as the approved food for the Sikhs. According to the ancient Aryan Hindu tradition, only such meat as is obtained from an animal which is killed with one stroke of the weapon causing instantaneous death is fit for human consumption. However, with the coming of Islam into India and the Muslim political hegemony, it became a state policy not to permit slaughter of animals for food, in any other manner, except as laid down in the Quran - the kosher meat prepared by slowly severing the main blood artery of the throat of the animal while reciting verses from the Quran. It is done to make slaughter a sacrifice to God and to expiate the sins of the slaughter. Guru Gobind Singh took a rather serious view of this aspect of the whole matter. He, therefore, while permitting flesh to be taken as food repudiated the whole theory of this expiatory sacrifice and the right of ruling Muslims to impose iton the non-Muslims. Accordingly, he made jhatka meat obligatory for those Sikhs who may be interested in taking meat as a part of their food.

Sikhs and Sikhism, Dr. I.J.Singh, Manohar Publishers.

And one semitic practice clearly rejected in the Sikh code of conduct is eating flesh of an animal cooked in ritualistic manner; this would mean kosher and halal meat. The reason again does not lie in religious tenet but in the view that killing an animal with a prayer is not going to enoble the flesh. No ritual, whoever conducts it, is going to do any good either to the animal or to the diner. Let man do what he must to assuage his hunger. If what he gets, he puts to good use and shares with the needy, then it is well used and well spent, otherwise not.

Why is Meat not served in Langar? The reason why meat is not served at langar in the Gurdwaras is because langar is supposed to be a symbol of equality of mankind where all people no matter what race, religion or caste can eat toghether in the atmosphere of brotherhood. Hindu, Sikh, Muslim, it does not matter who they are. Different religions have different dietary restrictions. Hindus cannot eat cow, muslims cannot eat pork and will only eat halal meat. Jews will only eat kosher meat, others cannot eat fish or eggs. But in a gurdwara langar, it does not matter what their dietary taboos or religious beliefs are, the food is designed so that all can eat together and no one will be offended or not be able to partake of the meal.

http://www.sikhs.org/meat.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it somewhat pointless bring up these issues time and time again, pro or against it shouldn’t be reflective of how we see, treat and stereotype people generally. That really is the issue in hand is equality and opportunity, do people consider those that drink alcohol, eat meat, take drugs etc etc as equal human beings?

In most cases people who practice such things are seen as lesser by those that are religiously minded and Upnai are particularly judgemental and vindictive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Do you really think that maharaj would not forgive his pyara fauji after he was fighting for the last 3 weeks without food.

Satgur mera sadha dheal

Guru ji sed rehat piari mujh ko sikh piara nahee, if a sikh had enuf sharda fr their guru they would kp rehat till the end - no meat , no drugs

vjkk vjkp

.

Do you really think that maharaj would not forgive his pyara fauji after he was fighting for the last 3 weeks without food.

Satgur mera sadha dheal

Guru ji sed rehat piari mujh ko sikh piara nahee, if a sikh had enuf sharda fr their guru they would kp rehat till the end - no meat , no drugs

vjkk vjkp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Do you really think that maharaj would not forgive his pyara fauji after he was fighting for the last 3 weeks without food.

Satgur mera sadha dheal

Guru ji sed rehat piari mujh ko sikh piara nahee, if a sikh had enuf sharda fr their guru they would kp rehat till the end - no meat , no drugs

vjkk vjkp

.

Do you really think that maharaj would not forgive his pyara fauji after he was fighting for the last 3 weeks without food.

Satgur mera sadha dheal

Guru ji sed rehat piari mujh ko sikh piara nahee, if a sikh had enuf sharda fr their guru they would kp rehat till the end - no meat , no drugs

vjkk vjkp

so we should listen to you not the akhal thakt! lol ok Jathadar Ji. I go with Akhal Thakt all day long (sorry) i dont eat meat but if you do feel free(no halal) i do not judge, its your relationship between god and you! Also the singhs who ate meat during battles, and is clear from evidence that they did!! you are judging them as well with that comment! shame on you!! think before you type!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL! U guys make me laugh! Waheguru gave us this thing called commonsense! I amazed that kaljug has gotton so bad that we've forgotton this thing called "common sense" still exists! :rolleyes listen,Guru Ji tells u, u do good, u get good, u do bad, u get bad! It IS realy that simple! U wanna eat meat, go ahead do it, but dont defame sikhi by trying to argue what is right or wrong according to what "YOU" interprete bani as being "gurmat" and non gurmat! I swaer dont u guys get bored of this! SS CLEARLY STATES that this is a no no discussion, but again, here we are! Mods plz close this useless and pointless topic!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use