It Guru Ji's Bana Not Nihang Bana!

[_!_GUPT_!_]

i didnt mean to cause any trouble with this topic but it seems like everyone has had a little argument :S

Basically can everyone please report this group to get rid of it as it is NOT nihang bana its guru ji's bana!

*END OF TOPIC*

[tec9]

they both the samething as the tenth guru was a nihang so it is a nihang bana and it is guru's bana what a stupid tread! By the way i havent bothered to read any previous reply to this just thought i would put my 2p worth in!

[samosa]

http://www.amritworld.com/main/nihang/nihang/

[Guru_Da_Chella]

I wouldn't use the amritworld site as being totally right, the views are biased.

I also found this on the sarbloh site lol (from the Akali Nihangs section under sanatan sikhs)

I have censored out parts that would be offensive to this website lol :

The Sanatan Sikhs - The Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa

Page 4 of 4

Nangs cont'd

A further issue that has to be highlighted is that ALL those Sikhs who are not Nihangs by action, tradition, attitude or the wisdom they possess, but, instead dress up as Nihangs to mislead people are also considered Nangs.

Many such fakes now exist and have convinced people they are Nihang Singhs. However, they are but fools, deceiving themselves, and those around them.

There are also many man-made personality cults such as the (censored), self-proclaimed Sants (saints), and their followers, that have adopted the Akali Nihang Singh uniform and (wrongly) claimed it as their own. This is a feeble attempt to appeal to people to gain new recruits. They in the most part do not even understand the origins of the uniform let alone its significance.

Some such groups have even accused the Akali Nihang Khalsa of not being true to history in order to keep the limelight away from their own hypocrisy and cult status.

Even many militant, fundamentalist, fanatic groups that have nothing to do with the Sanatan Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa, such as the (censored) who are the militant wing of the (censored), have also adopted this same image of the Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa. The followers of such movements are frequently depicted adorning the Akali Nihang uniform.

These same individuals insult and ridicule the very knowledge that brings about the uniform, heritage and traditions themselves. This section has caused an uproar from the groups guilty of being Nangs. However, this is inevitable as the truth will only hurt those individuals who are living a life entwined with hypocrisy, lies and confusion.

In the eyes of the Sanatan Sikhs, and especially the Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa, these people are in fact seen as even lower than Nangs, as they insult the very wisdom itself.

These personality cults, and self-proclaimed Sants are now sadly gaining the most members, both in India, and around the world under various names and guises.

[Into the Light]

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

[jassa]

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

guru gobind singh ji used nihang in at two places in sri dasam granth 1 in chandi di war for the army of durga other in bachiter natak hussanis battle where he called his fauj as nihangs ... and nihang for guru gobind singh is used not in one but many granths such as gurubilas patshahi 10 where its clearly said about ponta sahibs jung that nihang leading nihangs ie guru gobind singh ji leading his fauj !!!

and akali word came into being officially for guru sahiban and his fauj ever since akal bunga was made ...

[Player]

The sarbloh site could be seen as biased also. Everyone is biased in some way or other.

If your gonig to keep baana then behave like a Sikh of the Guru

[Into the Light]

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

guru gobind singh ji used nihang in at two places in sri dasam granth 1 in chandi di war for the army of durga other in bachiter natak hussanis battle where he called his fauj as nihangs ... and nihang for guru gobind singh is used not in one but many granths such as gurubilas patshahi 10 where its clearly said about ponta sahibs jung that nihang leading nihangs ie guru gobind singh ji leading his fauj !!!

and akali word came into being officially for guru sahiban and his fauj ever since akal bunga was made ...

Other than Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Jee (where you state Guroo Jee is not referring to himself) are any of these accounts, that do refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung of the time period of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720)?

[Into the Light]

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

guru gobind singh ji used nihang in at two places in sri dasam granth 1 in chandi di war for the army of durga other in bachiter natak hussanis battle where he called his fauj as nihangs ... and nihang for guru gobind singh is used not in one but many granths such as gurubilas patshahi 10 where its clearly said about ponta sahibs jung that nihang leading nihangs ie guru gobind singh ji leading his fauj !!!

and akali word came into being officially for guru sahiban and his fauj ever since akal bunga was made ...

Other than Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Jee (where you state Guroo Jee is not referring to himself) are any of these accounts, that do refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung of the time period of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720)?

no replies?

am i to assume that there is no evidence to prove that Guroo was a Nihung?

[akal sahai]

can't be bothered lol, believe what you want.........