Clarifications On Dasam Granth

[republicofkhalistan]

These works are attributed to Dasam Patshah:

1. Dasam Granth

2. Sarbloh Granth

3. Puranmasi Katha

4. Mukt Marg Granth

5. Prem Sumarag Granth

6. Vidya Sagar Granth (never found after it was drown in river Sirsa)

Now these works are attributed to guru Ji.

The first 2 are quite known... But the other 3? What are the sangats view about this? And also Kam1825, you once said in a topic you would scan and post Puranmasi Katha... Please do it. It would be amazing seva and i would be thankfull to you.

Wasnt Prem Sumarag Granth written somewhere near the 1800s? Is there any Brahmgyani Ji that said that Prem Sumarag was written by Guru ji?

And what is Mukt Marag Granth all about?

Sorry if i offended anyone, but this just seems TOO interesting.

Bhul Chuk Maaf

WJKK WJKF

[republicofkhalistan]

Well actually SGPC has banned Charitropakhyan/Tria Chariter...

"The S.G.P.C. has called it a Puranic myth and not work of the Tenth Guru.."

"The SGPC, vide its letter no. 36672 dated 3. 8. 1972, has declared to be a composition from Hindu mythology and not by the Tenth Master, could have been combined with sacred gurbani by any Sikh"

[Guest shastr]

whos talking about charitropakhyan?

[republicofkhalistan]

Sorry mate.

My mistake, it was CHARITROPAKHYAN and not CHANDI CHARITAR that wasnt included. Sorry again. I edited tht post.

[Inder Singh]

Well actually SGPC has banned Charitropakhyan/Tria Chariter...

"The S.G.P.C. has called it a Puranic myth and not work of the Tenth Guru.."

"The SGPC, vide its letter no. 36672 dated 3. 8. 1972, has declared to be a composition from Hindu mythology and not by the Tenth Master, could have been combined with sacred gurbani by any Sikh"

SGPC has not banned Charitropakhayan.That letter is fake.

Cahritopakhayan is not hindu myth.These are mythical stories with moral lessons.Charitra 1 and last charitra that is chaupai sahib are about akal purakh.

Chandi charitras are in stndard version.Malkaus ki vaar is taken out.Incidentally i see no reason why Malkaus ki vaar should be taken out.

It starts as

ik oankar waheguru ji ki fateh

Vaar malkaus ki patshahi 10

Malkaus dhun bisal banai

Alakh nam sacha sadai

Jab Dono hada ek rakhai

nanak Eh bidh sache ko ban ayi

Nanak jo prabh bhavange

Har ji har mandar avenge

Sorry mate.

My mistake, it was CHARITROPAKHYAN and not CHANDI CHARITAR that wasnt included. Sorry again. I edited tht post.

Both these compositions are there in standard version

[Guest shastr]

charitropakhyan is the one with 405 charitars right? well that is included in the bir with 1428 angs, along with chandi charitar, cuz i was about to say, how on earth would they take out chandi charitar.

[Inder Singh]

charitropakhyan is the one with 405 charitars right? well that is included in the bir with 1428 angs, along with chandi charitar, cuz i was about to say, how on earth would they take out chandi charitar.

There are 404 Charitras.Chandi di vaar and Charitropakhayan are included in standard Dasam granth.

[Guest shastr]

"ett sri charitropakhyane tariya charitare mantri bhoop sambadhe char sau panch charitar sumapath mast sub mast afjoo, dohora"

thats from sampooran reheraas sahib. "char sau panch", as in 405...... right?

[Inder Singh]

"ett sri charitropakhyane tariya charitare mantri bhoop sambadhe char sau panch charitar sumapath mast sub mast afjoo, dohora"

thats from sampooran reheraas sahib. "char sau panch", as in 405...... right?

This is the concluding verse of Chaupai sahib

ਚੌਪਈ ॥

चौपई ॥

CHAUPAI

ਸੰਬਤ ਸੱਤ੍ਰਹ ਸਹਸ ਭਣਿੱਜੈ ॥ ਅਰਧ ਸਹਸ ਫੁਨਿ ਤੀਨਿ ਕਹਿੱਜੈ ॥

स्मबत स्त्रह सहस भणि्जै ॥ अरध सहस फुनि तीनि कहि्जै ॥

It was Bikrami Samvat 1753;

ਭਾਦ੍ਰਵ ਸੁਦੀ ਅਸ਼ਟਮੀ ਰਵਿ ਵਾਰਾ ॥ ਤੀਰ ਸਤੁੱਦ੍ਰਵ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸੁਧਾਰਾ ॥੪੦੫॥

भाद्रव सुदी अशटमी रवि वारा ॥ तीर सतु्द्रव ग्रंथ सुधारा ॥४०५॥

This book was competed on the banks of Sutlej on Sunday, the eighth Sudi of the month of Bhadon.

There are 404 Charitras before that .Chaupai sahib is not numbered in Charitra.

[xHarinder_singh]

on some websites, its mentioned that compositions like Sri Akal Ustat and Sri Gyan Parbodh were left incomplete. Is this true ???

If a complete granth was compiled before 1699, how can some compositions be left incomplete ?