Jump to content

Muslims View On Veg And Non Veg


akal sahai
 Share

Recommended Posts

............ however zakir naik is very knowledgeable on islam and ............

Trust me, he's not.

Zakir Naik is indeed very Knowledgeable on Islam but i feel he's very cunning, dishonest and misleading. He often cites false figures to justify issues like Polygamy etc.

And i read his views on Sikhism in his study on comparitive religion where he says Guru Nanak patshah was influenced by Kabir Ji and satguru patshah would often go to muslims for advice.....i mean why would satguru patshah go to anyone for any advice when he himself was ek-jot with waheguru and on what evidence did Zakir Naik wrote all dat shyt?

And then Ali Sina of faithfreedom.org had also done a written commentary on Zakir Naik's debate with christian scholar William Campbell whom muslims site as a victory. Ali sina has revealed how Zakir Naik attributed a number of verses from quran in one go and said amidst thunderous claps from muslims that these verses explain water cycle in 'great detail' but when the verses were anaysed there was no rocket science or great detail. They were very basic things that are seen by naked eye but surely if i would have been present among the audience i would also have been impressed. Zakir Naik's surely a great orator and perfomer but hardly a honest propogator of truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

another thort that occured to me was, when the islamics execute sinners cos they beleive Allah wants them to, they always strike from the back. why when they have the backing of Allah? when they halal sheeps and stuff, they always pull the head back so the animal cannot see the blade the halaler is holding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had this conversation with a muslim girl when i was in uni. I asked her "can a Muslim be a vegeterian"? she replied "its wrong for a muslim to be vegeterian because they are turning something that is halal (ie something that is right) into harram (ie something that is wrong)". So basically what she was saying was, if a muslim refuses to eat meat (even if it is halal), they can not be a muslim because God has made it permissible for them to eat it.

I challanged her opinion by asking "are vegetables halal (permissible to eat)?" she replied yes. I asked what if someone decided they dont like eating potatoas becasue they dont like them. potatoes are halal, so are they turning something halal (potatoes)into something haram? at this she changed her original opinion and said, it is the muslims individuals choice weather or not they chose to eat halal meat.

As for Dr. Zakir Naik, there is some truth in what he says but he does frequently pass of his false findings as fact. I will make an assumption that half the crowed that listen to him are uneducated as they just happily gobble up what ever he tells them without giving it a second thought.... if requested i will give examples in due course.

Pfft - I'm a Muslim and she doesn't seem so knowledgable on the matter. Just because something is Halal doesn't mean it's obbligatory!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had this conversation with a muslim girl when i was in uni. I asked her "can a Muslim be a vegeterian"? she replied "its wrong for a muslim to be vegeterian because they are turning something that is halal (ie something that is right) into harram (ie something that is wrong)". So basically what she was saying was, if a muslim refuses to eat meat (even if it is halal), they can not be a muslim because God has made it permissible for them to eat it.

I challanged her opinion by asking "are vegetables halal (permissible to eat)?" she replied yes. I asked what if someone decided they dont like eating potatoas becasue they dont like them. potatoes are halal, so are they turning something halal (potatoes)into something haram? at this she changed her original opinion and said, it is the muslims individuals choice weather or not they chose to eat halal meat.

As for Dr. Zakir Naik, there is some truth in what he says but he does frequently pass of his false findings as fact. I will make an assumption that half the crowed that listen to him are uneducated as they just happily gobble up what ever he tells them without giving it a second thought.... if requested i will give examples in due course.

Pfft - I'm a Muslim and she doesn't seem so knowledgable on the matter. Just because something is Halal doesn't mean it's obbligatory!

TO THOSE WHO ARE REPLYING TO THE CHATKA/GOAT ISSUE AT HAZOOR SAHIB, INSTEAD OF ARGUING AND BICKERING THEIR, ANSWER THE VIDEO..

HE SAYS THAT PLANTS CAN FEEL PAIN AND HAVE SENSES TOO, SO THEN IS EATING MEAT WRONG BECAUSE PLANTS ALSO FEEL PAIN WHEN YOU KILL THEM?

WE SIT THERE MAKING A MOCKERY OF THE VIDEO, LAUGHING AT THE ENGLISH, ETC BUT WHAT IF SOMEONE CAME HERE AND SAW THIS VIDEO?

LETS BEGIN TO ANSWER QUESTIONS WITHOUT BRUSHING THINGS UNDER THE CARPET..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had this conversation with a muslim girl when i was in uni. I asked her "can a Muslim be a vegeterian"? she replied "its wrong for a muslim to be vegeterian because they are turning something that is halal (ie something that is right) into harram (ie something that is wrong)". So basically what she was saying was, if a muslim refuses to eat meat (even if it is halal), they can not be a muslim because God has made it permissible for them to eat it.

I challanged her opinion by asking "are vegetables halal (permissible to eat)?" she replied yes. I asked what if someone decided they dont like eating potatoas becasue they dont like them. potatoes are halal, so are they turning something halal (potatoes)into something haram? at this she changed her original opinion and said, it is the muslims individuals choice weather or not they chose to eat halal meat.

As for Dr. Zakir Naik, there is some truth in what he says but he does frequently pass of his false findings as fact. I will make an assumption that half the crowed that listen to him are uneducated as they just happily gobble up what ever he tells them without giving it a second thought.... if requested i will give examples in due course.

Pfft - I'm a Muslim and she doesn't seem so knowledgable on the matter. Just because something is Halal doesn't mean it's obbligatory!

TO THOSE WHO ARE REPLYING TO THE CHATKA/GOAT ISSUE AT HAZOOR SAHIB, INSTEAD OF ARGUING AND BICKERING THEIR, ANSWER THE VIDEO..

HE SAYS THAT PLANTS CAN FEEL PAIN AND HAVE SENSES TOO, SO THEN IS EATING MEAT WRONG BECAUSE PLANTS ALSO FEEL PAIN WHEN YOU KILL THEM?

WE SIT THERE MAKING A MOCKERY OF THE VIDEO, LAUGHING AT THE ENGLISH, ETC BUT WHAT IF SOMEONE CAME HERE AND SAW THIS VIDEO?

LETS BEGIN TO ANSWER QUESTIONS WITHOUT BRUSHING THINGS UNDER THE CARPET..

you're not gonna sing are you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use