Jump to content

ਬੇਦ ਕਤੇਬ ਕਹਹੁ ਮਤ ਝੂਠੇ


Bijla Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what r u sorry for pjs?

what wrong u did?

and gurmat sangeet thx for opening my eyes

this is the copy of arths by prof. sahib singh from the link u posted. i was not able to read the arths in punjabi from the website and thats why i am posting that in punjabi here

ArQ:- (hy ihMdU qy muslmwn vIro!) vydW jW kurwn Awidk (iek dUjy dIAW) Drm-pusqkW ƒ JUTIAW nwh AwKo [ JUTw qW auh bMdw hY jo iehnW Drm-pusqkW dI ivcwr nhIN krdw [ (Blw, hy mu`lW!) jy qUM ieh AwKdw hYN ik ^udw sB jIvW ivc mOjUd hY qW (aus ^udw A`gy kurbwnI dyx leI) murZI ikauN mwrdw hYN? (kI aus murZI ivc auh Awp nhIN hY? murZI ivc bYTy ^udw dI AMS ƒ mwr ky ^udw dy A`gy hI Bytw krn dw kIh Bwv hY? [1[

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The very sad thing is that we as a community have reached such a stage where one Sikh cannot even do veechar of Gurbani, our very purpose of life as Guru-vale, without being made to feel like a heretic.

Shaabash khalsa fauj!

When veechar is done with nimrata, pyaar and in sehaj then no issues arise of animosity and none is left feeling like a heretic for having a disscussion. Instead both parties should leave with a sense of self betterment.

But when one is not open to others opinions, interpretations and views (lacking appreciation for others views) then veechar will never take place in its real sense. Just a 'dressed up' attempt to push your own personal view. The internet doesn't help with this either - it allows for unaccounatbility, veechar is always going to better done in person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Veer Bijla singh Ji, Excellent original post, very palusblie.

Now 'thru no falut of any1 else except my own' I am more confused. I always thought that when we are 'vichaaring' Gurbani we have to keep couple of things in mind;

1) Guru Amardasji's anmol vachan ' sanjhi sagal jhanei'; Gurbani addresses an issue with an example but the 'sikhiya' applies to all 'not only to the one/ones being addressed'.

2) Gurbani's 'vastu' is eternal and universal while the contemporary example's roop is only applicable to that time's customs, happenings, things etc.

3) Gurbani's 'vastu' always conveys continuouty 'eik-saarta' in the message, 'no mutually opposing messages'

Now when I read the following 'anmol vachan' after looking at your post;

ਸਲੋਕ ਮ ੧ ॥ ਦੀਵਾ ਬਲੈ ਅੰਧੇਰਾ ਜਾਇ ॥ ਬੇਦ ਪਾਠ ਮਤਿ ਪਾਪਾ ਖਾਇ ॥

ਉਗਵੈ ਸੂਰੁ ਨ ਜਾਪੈ ਚੰਦੁ ॥ ਜਹ ਗਿਆਨ ਪ੍ਰਗਾਸੁ ਅਗਿਆਨੁ ਮਿਟੰਤੁ ॥

ਬੇਦ ਪਾਠ ਸੰਸਾਰ ਕੀ ਕਾਰ ॥ ਪੜ੍ਹ੍ਹਿ ਪੜ੍ਹ੍ਹਿ ਪੰਡਿਤ ਕਰਹਿ ਬੀਚਾਰ ॥ ਬਿਨੁ ਬੂਝੇ ਸਭ ਹੋਇ ਖੁਆਰ ॥

I used to understand that Gurbani is always exposing the futility of the ritualised 'karamas'. Hence here the true meaning (as I used to think) is that the ritual of 'paath' as just a worldly 'kaar' does not, but contemplating with real 'bhavana' to understand confers one with the 'gian' to clean the 'mat' to wash away the sins etc.

But than if one goes about this with the understanding you have very plausibly explained in your post then 'ਬੇਦ ਪਾਠ ਮਤਿ ਪਾਪਾ ਖਾਇ' will confuse me, as I cannot then apply the 3 rules mentioned above and interpret this as it has been always been interpreted.

History quite evidently shows us that its not the 'scriptures' but the practices around them which keep on laying more and more bricks on the 'ਕੂੜੈ ਪਾਲਿ' to boost our egos. The very 'false wall' our weak minds cannot break, at least have not been able to do so so far. That I thought was the eternal, universal truth of wonderous Gurbani, but then I may have lost the plot altogether!

Please forgive my ignorance and indulgence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use