Jump to content

Question To Raju


xHarinder_singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Raju seems to be a relatively nice Indian (he might be reading some chanakya niti secretly in the night though, lol, jokes, haha). It will be nice if we can have some debate whether Mr. Gandhi shud be called father of "nation" by the hindu population. What did he give to hindus ? Bomb blasts ? 25 crore muslim population ? poverty ? Corruption ? U have hindu leaders like Chand Mohammad converting to Islam(which might be a chanakya niti, where other hindu follow the footsteps of Chand Mohammad and "convert" to Islam, and become "muslims" and INCREASE THE INTELLIGENCE of the hindu intelligence network).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raju seems to be a relatively nice Indian (he might be reading some chanakya niti secretly in the night though, lol, jokes, haha). It will be nice if we can have some debate whether Mr. Gandhi shud be called father of "nation" by the hindu population. What did he give to hindus ? Bomb blasts ? 25 crore muslim population ? poverty ? Corruption ? U have hindu leaders like Chand Mohammad converting to Islam(which might be a chanakya niti, where other hindu follow the footsteps of Chand Mohammad and "convert" to Islam, and become "muslims" and INCREASE THE INTELLIGENCE of the hindu intelligence network).

Hmmmm, wrong sections : has very little to do with Sikh Politics. This is more hindu related. Never the less, It is totally up to the " Hindu population " if they want to call Gandhi father of the nation. We might have certan grievens with it but its their opinion which should be respected. Unless it directly has an effect on sikhi we shouldnt get involved its not a matter for sikhs to get tied up in. Think we have better things to do.

"What did he give to hindus ? " thats for the hindus to know and discuss!

"U have hindu leaders like Chand Mohammad converting to Islam" Thats up to him if he wants to convert, long as it wasnt forceable no need for us to have any concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raju seems to be a relatively nice Indian (he might be reading some chanakya niti secretly in the night though, lol, jokes, haha). It will be nice if we can have some debate whether Mr. Gandhi shud be called father of "nation" by the hindu population. What did he give to hindus ? Bomb blasts ? 25 crore muslim population ? poverty ? Corruption ? U have hindu leaders like Chand Mohammad converting to Islam(which might be a chanakya niti, where other hindu follow the footsteps of Chand Mohammad and "convert" to Islam, and become "muslims" and INCREASE THE INTELLIGENCE of the hindu intelligence network).

Hmmmm, wrong sections : has very little to do with Sikh Politics. This is more hindu related. Never the less, It is totally up to the " Hindu population " if they want to call Gandhi father of the nation. We might have certan grievens with it but its their opinion which should be respected. Unless it directly has an effect on sikhi we shouldnt get involved its not a matter for sikhs to get tied up in. Think we have better things to do.

"What did he give to hindus ? " thats for the hindus to know and discuss!

"U have hindu leaders like Chand Mohammad converting to Islam" Thats up to him if he wants to convert, long as it wasnt forceable no need for us to have any concerns.

Yes, their opinion shud be respected. But there are 2 things here.

1. hindus shud call gandhi father of hindu nation and NOT nation.

2. By calling gandhi as father of nation, hindus are going to isolate themselves from sikhs. Nathuram Godse shud be the father of the hindu nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raju seems to be a relatively nice Indian (he might be reading some chanakya niti secretly in the night though, lol, jokes, haha). It will be nice if we can have some debate whether Mr. Gandhi shud be called father of "nation" by the hindu population. What did he give to hindus ? Bomb blasts ? 25 crore muslim population ? poverty ? Corruption ? U have hindu leaders like Chand Mohammad converting to Islam(which might be a chanakya niti, where other hindu follow the footsteps of Chand Mohammad and "convert" to Islam, and become "muslims" and INCREASE THE INTELLIGENCE of the hindu intelligence network).

Chand Mohammad is just one hindu who converted to Islam, there is also "Dharmender" who converted to Islam after his second marriage to Hema Malini. He adopted the name of Bahadur Khan or something. Probably just convenience or dhimmitude.

the terrorist attacks carried out by Islamists all over India has completely bypassed these gentlemen who still live in bliss, their minds not polluted by any hate that is natural to arise in common people as a result of the goings on.

Coming to Gandhi, he has his own place in Indian history. Very few people, including Hindus, get him right on the first study.

His role was different, he had to reverse the 'divide and rule' policy of the British and the culture of hate which completely surrounded the environment of the country in those days. Baloch fighting against Hindus/Sikhs. Gorkhas fighting against Sikhs/Muslims. Sikhs being used to fight against Muslims and Muslims from Potohar being used to quash any rebellion by bhaiyyas. It was a right royal mess.

Gandhi provided a different perspective, his methods were planned only for the Brits, he would have not been successful against a Mughal despot like Aurangzeb.

It was entirely due to his efforts that the likes of Frontier Gandhi (Bacha Khan) decided to side with the likes of Bose and provide united front against British.

Gandhi might not be perfect, but he provided solutions and leadership during that crunch hour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

btw some people seem to think that I am a Hindu going by my i.d. This is incorrect.

I am a Syrian Orthodox Christian. Our Church is headquarted at Antioch and Mosul, Iraq.

It is part of the Eastern Orthodox Church which is prevalent in Syria, Greece and Russia.

And small numbers are found in Iraq, Jordan and India.

During Ottoman period when Turkey, (in whose land Antioch is found) was ransacked by the Ottomans and Muslims during crusades came under Islamic occupation, the Christians fled those lands.

One of the places they later came to was India.

Check out these wiki links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignatius_Zakka_I_Iwas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syriac_Orthodox_Church

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That just left me dazed and confused. I skimmed through it, but there's little or no information as to your beleif all I saw was words that I've never heard before, maybe you might want to get your people to edit that. Thanks for the links though, it just makes me appreciate Sikhi that much more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use