Jump to content

reactions of sum hindus


Recommended Posts

Curious Man, you shouldn’t get too angry. I’m sure Kunti Putra is just a misinformed man. He’s obviously just heard the story from one side. Best way to convince someone is through tolerance and pyaar, and lets hope one day he sees the truth and acts like a true “Kunti Putra”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhs have given nothing to Hindus.
:umm: Guru Tegh Bahadur sacrificed himself for Hindus in Kashmir, and this <banned word filter activated> says Sikhs gave nothing to Hindus.
Everytime the Muslims rise and persecute, Sikhs come and join with Hindus and as soon as they get a chance they turn upon Hindus.

When have Sikhs turned against Hindus?

Sikhs were instrumental in the British rule of India. Hindus should be mad at Sikhs for that. We forgived them, but they refuse to mend their ways.
:D Maybe he should be mad at his own folks for not doing something to be instrumental. Jeezzzz what a JEALOUS man :(
Sikhs do not want to share. They want to continue to sominate. They are afraid of being asked to treat Hindus as equals.

Sikhi is all about vand ke shakana out of our earnings. Sikhi sees all humans as equal to us no matter what religion and where they come from.

What a seriously misinformed murakh :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

tru tru tru....i send him an email....

i said..... that u r yelling so much about marathas did that and so..... but remember...if sikhs wud have not been there ....marathas like shivaji wud not have been there...they all gained tactics from guru Hargobind ji....

and moreover ...if Sikhs wud have not been that time...u wud have not even been a Hindu....as u know how fast the whole of india was converting to muslims....

aah..and all this abt british empire stuff....out of 2% population of india(i.e. of Sikhs)...85% of sikhs fought against them....and ok just say rest 15% were in imperial army....but what has the rest 98% of population did.....

wht abt the imperial army deep in south...east ...west ...and central.... who let the britishers to enter and spread ...were there sikhs in bengal...were there sikhs in whole east india...were there sikhs ...in southern india....were there sikhs in central india...rajasthan...NO they were not in mojority....how could u say we helped the britishers to rise.....wht happened to all rajputs...huh??

just remember one thing ..today u r hindu....and proud to be hindu...only because the sikhs fought most strongly against the mughals....to save whom ..the hindus and downtrodden..... ???

if u still think i m wrong.....reply me....if not still reply...i m here not afraid...!!

Boley Soooo Nihal!!.... Satshriakal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use