Jump to content

New Baba Nihal Singh Ji Nihang Katha


Recommended Posts

I think this debate has gone on long enough.

Some Basic point

1) We are all sons of the same father

2) We may have been split into different jathebandis to achieve specific aims of the panth - some like seva - kar seva, some kirtan - akj, some martial arts - nihang singhs, some gurbani jaap and arth - damdamitaksaal.

3) The jathedaars of Taksaal do not mention the Nihang Singh link or Budha Dal link etc. If you want to beleive it, so be it.

4) You state taksaal Singh dropped the bana

''Some devoted their lives to parchar and santhiya and adopted the white, or color of saint hood and purity. nihang singha had to remain shaster dhari kamar kaase tyar bar tyar neel baana or orange shaheedi bana at all times as full time soldiers. Akaalis ofcourse were the generals''

I have several pics of Taksaal Vidiarthis who wear ''not taksali bana if there is one'', some pics of Baba Gurbachan Singh Jee with shastars etc.

5) Taksaal Vidiarthis may have worn a ''more planar bana and a saintly dress'', but when required to give their heads and stand up for the panth they gave kurbania in very massive numbers, a huge proportion of the generals of the current movement were vidiarthis of Sant Jee and/or had close links - hence retook up yor ''apparent bana - shastars etc'' and lead the kaum, can the same be said about others?

''Guru sahib gave the orders to start it to teach proper santhiya to jangi singhs as well as rest of the panth.''

It seems then that taksaal gave santhia to the nihang singhs, hence it being a different entity.

On an overall bigger picture, who cares? i personally dont, the jathedaars state differently, you beleive what you want, i dnt really care

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

''Guru sahib gave the orders to start it to teach proper santhiya to jangi singhs as well as rest of the panth.''

It seems then that taksaal gave santhia to the nihang singhs, hence it being a different entity.

in the misl period back then. nihangs had different duties. there were langari nihangs, jangi nihangs, and also the vidyaarthi nihangs who gave santhiya and many more. so instead of just listening to one side of the story "taksali katha" you should do your own research too my friend :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have several pics of Taksaal Vidiarthis who wear ''not taksali bana if there is one'', some pics of Baba Gurbachan Singh Jee with shastars etc.

5) Taksaal Vidiarthis may have worn a ''more planar bana and a saintly dress'', but when required to give their heads and stand up for the panth they gave kurbania in very massive numbers, a huge proportion of the generals of the current movement were vidiarthis of Sant Jee and/or had close links - hence retook up yor ''apparent bana - shastars etc'' and lead the kaum, can the same be said about others?

I am quite sure I said there were ALLOWED to disarm not that they were required too. If some one wanted to keep shaster rehat, chardi kala. They were not MANDATED to be fully shaster dhari with their kamar kaasas tied.

5.. are you doubting Harienvelas shaheedis? Baba Nihal Singh ji isn't called jinda shaheed cause it sounds cool. This isnt a contest of who has sacrificed more, that becomes a houmai contest.

''Guru sahib gave the orders to start it to teach proper santhiya to jangi singhs as well as rest of the panth.''

It seems then that taksaal gave santhia to the nihang singhs, hence it being a different entity.

So i guess the dals raagis, langar seva, etc are not nihangs because they are not jangi singhs. Budha dal therefore can not be nihangs as well as they dont do most of the fighting... combat is done by taruna dal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ek pita ekas ke hum baarak

lol who came first the chicken or the egg...

has turned into

who came first the taksali or the nihang

I say neither - IK was first and after that...

eaekas bin sabh dhha(n)dhh hai sabh mithhiaa mohu maae ||1|| rehaao ||

Without the One, all entanglements are worthless; emotional attachment to Maya is totally false. ||1||Pause||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use