Jump to content

Khalistan In The Unpo


Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

I know that in 1993, Khalistan was accepted as a full member of the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO).

UNPO raises awareness of members internationally and allows UNPO members to participate in international dialogue. It also maintains close relations with the United Nations and the European Union, supporting participation of its Members in international forums. Through UNPO, Members have opportunities to present their cases to international bodies such as: the United Nations Human Rights Council, the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, and European Union institutions.

That sounds great, and we were members as Khalistan... However, looking through the UNPO website now - it seems Khalistan is no longer a member.

Does anyone know why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this thing better ought not to be discussed. It will just show how idiotic our Sikhs have been... The reason was jealousy of fellow Sikhs...

Bhul Chuk Maaf,

WJKK WJKF

(FYI, it wasn't a member for a long time, a few months or 1 year maximum)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so what happened? i thought khalistan was never part of it as many international organizations dont see sikhs as seperate from hindus because of the post-partition law in hindustan?

True that is what the UN told us they said how can Sikhs as for freedom when they already have freedom?We questioned what do you mean freedom ,UN said Sikhs(Hindus) are already free and they have India(Hindustan) so if Hindus(Sikhs) are free why do they want a seperate nation from their fellow Hindus, - he knew we was a seperate nation and all that but he was pointing to something in the Indian Constitution that Sikhs are catergorized as Hindus, and India uses this to shut up human rights groups and the UN by saying Sikhs are Hindus and Hindus already have freedom.

Khalistan was thrown out of the UNPO a few months after it joined,this happened through Indian Pressure and foolish pro Indian Sikhs within our own Gurdwareh's and Communities who called Khalistanis extremists and said they do not represent Sikhs.

Even Sindhis the Hindus in Pakistan are part of the UNPO but I guess they have the backing of the Hindu Govt of India .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what happened: Dr Gurmit Singh Aulakh got Khalistan admitted in the UNPO. The flag of Khalistan was also hoisted by him. Later, in jealousy, or government pressure, Dr. Jagjit Singh Chauhan and Simranjit Singh Mann wrote several letters against Dr. Aulakh, saying that he had no right to do so, etc, resulted in the removal of Khalistan from the UNPO. It was a member for a few months only.

Just read history of 1947 to now... And notice how divided we are! We are even more divided than the Muslims who have 73 sects and the Christians who have hundreds of sects...

Bhul Chuk Maaf,

WJKK WJKF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...
On 4/27/2018 at 10:02 AM, Tejvir said:

Anyway of petitioning the decision and getting Khalistan back into UNPO?

Would definetly add clout to Punjab 2020 Referendum. 

I have no expertise in this, but I'd look to how other groups achieved it for the formula and process. 

It seems in the past Hindustan has claimed that constitutionally Sikhs are Hindu. However Guru Granth Sahib Ji clearly states otherwise and that would have to be asserted. Further backed by the evidence and history of human rights violations against the Sangat by Hindustan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use