Jump to content

Sant Ramanand Was Target: Eyewitness


Azaad
 Share

Recommended Posts

Attack on Sant Niranjan Dass and Sant Ramanand in Vienna has taken a new turn with an eyewitness claiming the latter was the target of the attackers and not the former as was being projected by the media.

While the attack on the duo in a Ravidass temple on May 24 had been reported as an attack on Dera head Sant Niranjan Das, but an aide and witness of the incident, today told media persons the accused had come to kill Sant Ramanand and not the former.

Tarsem Lal, said Sant Niranjan Das was sitting ahead while Sant Ramanand was sitting five or six feet behind him when the assailants came and one of them started shooting Sant Ramanand first, he added.

Lal had accompanied both the sants during their tour to Austria and came back today with the body of the Sant and a recuperating Sant Niranjan Dass.

He said Sant Niranjan Das was hit in the melee that followed as the rushed to the aid of his deputy and got injured, he said.

However, he was silent on the identity of the assailants and evaded other queries.

Initially it was reported some Sikh fundamentalists had targeted dera head Niranjan Dass for allowing his followers to touch his feet in the presence of Guru Granth Sahib.

The Vienna police too had also reported the attack was premeditated and a conspiracy. What lends credence to fresh revelation is the fact Sant Ramanand had been named successor of Sant Niranjan Das but he was more dynamic of the duo and it was due to his efforts that the more than 36 deras had come up across Europe alone.

He was largely credited with popularising the sect across the globe. Like Sant Niranjan Das, he was given "Chadavah? (religious offering) to the dera when he was a kid.

Known as aggressive and assertive person, he was graduate and had introduced the concept of circulating CDs and DVDs to propagate the teachings of Sant Ravidass. Hence, a possible threat to those who killed him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jason12

Mind you, the news item didn't say that Sikhs terrorists were not to blame. It is true that Sant Rama Nand was instrumental in spreading the mission of Guru Ravidass Ji across the world. So to stop the spread of mission, the sikh terrorists must have though it best to take out the target. Matha tekna was made an issue here but this killing is more to derail Guru Ravidass Ji's mission.

Since Austrian Police says that they were Sikh Fundamentalists and also seems to be a caste factor. It is clear high caste sikhs or sikhs who don't like running of Guru ravidass temples, because it takes away dalit charawah from their gurudwaras may have taken the action. It is not an unknown fact that sikhs don't like ravidassis calling ravidass as Guru and they are extremely jealous of Guru ravidass temples progress. They see the lower castes slipping out of their grip.

If Tarsem lal, the eyewitness didn't say anything about attackers, it could be because calling them sikhs again may infuriate millions of dalits in India. Now whether they were born sikhs or dressed as sikhs needs to be seen. But sikhs haven't been ruled out yet. So please don't jump to conclusions. Since they carried gatras in traditional sense, they must have been amritdhari sikhs. Same gatras these "sikhs" prodly used to attack unarmed worshippers and took a little girl hostage, we heard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since they carried gatras in traditional sense, they must have been amritdhari sikhs. Same gatras these "sikhs" prodly used to attack unarmed worshippers and took a little girl hostage, we heard.

They must have been wearing some real scary looking gatras to be able to use them to take a little girl hostage in a room full of brave Ravidasias.

K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mind you, the news item didn't say that Sikhs terrorists were not to blame. It is true that Sant Rama Nand was instrumental in spreading the mission of Guru Ravidass Ji across the world. So to stop the spread of mission, the sikh terrorists must have though it best to take out the target. Matha tekna was made an issue here but this killing is more to derail Guru Ravidass Ji's mission.

Since Austrian Police says that they were Sikh Fundamentalists and also seems to be a caste factor. It is clear high caste sikhs or sikhs who don't like running of Guru ravidass temples, because it takes away dalit charawah from their gurudwaras may have taken the action. It is not an unknown fact that sikhs don't like ravidassis calling ravidass as Guru and they are extremely jealous of Guru ravidass temples progress. They see the lower castes slipping out of their grip.

If Tarsem lal, the eyewitness didn't say anything about attackers, it could be because calling them sikhs again may infuriate millions of dalits in India. Now whether they were born sikhs or dressed as sikhs needs to be seen. But sikhs haven't been ruled out yet. So please don't jump to conclusions. Since they carried gatras in traditional sense, they must have been amritdhari sikhs. Same gatras these "sikhs" prodly used to attack unarmed worshippers and took a little girl hostage, we heard.

dont jump to any conclusions? you just jumped on a whole pile of them. btw no one cares about the ravidassia. lol, most sikhs didnt even know your little cult existed before the shooting. have a nice day :) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jason12
Since they carried gatras in traditional sense, they must have been amritdhari sikhs. Same gatras these "sikhs" prodly used to attack unarmed worshippers and took a little girl hostage, we heard.

They must have been wearing some real scary looking gatras to be able to use them to take a little girl hostage in a room full of brave Ravidasias.

K.

You can see the pictures on net. Ravidassias who were unarmed gave them very good thrashing. I hope you were not expecting little girl to snatch the knife, are you? They sikhs were sikh i.e mentally sick and now sikhs would sing dhadiwaars about them and glorifying them on youtube. Such a pathetic response.

Mind you, the news item didn't say that Sikhs terrorists were not to blame. It is true that Sant Rama Nand was instrumental in spreading the mission of Guru Ravidass Ji across the world. So to stop the spread of mission, the sikh terrorists must have though it best to take out the target. Matha tekna was made an issue here but this killing is more to derail Guru Ravidass Ji's mission.

Since Austrian Police says that they were Sikh Fundamentalists and also seems to be a caste factor. It is clear high caste sikhs or sikhs who don't like running of Guru ravidass temples, because it takes away dalit charawah from their gurudwaras may have taken the action. It is not an unknown fact that sikhs don't like ravidassis calling ravidass as Guru and they are extremely jealous of Guru ravidass temples progress. They see the lower castes slipping out of their grip.

If Tarsem lal, the eyewitness didn't say anything about attackers, it could be because calling them sikhs again may infuriate millions of dalits in India. Now whether they were born sikhs or dressed as sikhs needs to be seen. But sikhs haven't been ruled out yet. So please don't jump to conclusions. Since they carried gatras in traditional sense, they must have been amritdhari sikhs. Same gatras these "sikhs" prodly used to attack unarmed worshippers and took a little girl hostage, we heard.

dont jump to any conclusions? you just jumped on a whole pile of them. btw no one cares about the ravidassia. lol, most sikhs didnt even know your little cult existed before the shooting. have a nice day :) .

MOD EDIT I guess sikhs are a voilent cult and members of this cult engage in terrorism against innocents and against other religions like now Talibans do. How similar are you to them? No wonder, it is your reputation and the talk from people like you that peace loving sikhs also get attacked in US here. Shame on you. Straighten up guys. your world is changing around you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These guys followed this Sant because he was of a same caste. This Sant was propagating Bhagat Ravidas's teachings just because of same caste.

So now comes religion based on caste! You have to be doing leather business to join. These guys are setting up same system which Bhagat Ravidas fought against.

Get a chapni nak dubaon layee!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use