Jump to content

The Moon landing/40s years ago...faked ??


Guest fordcapri
 Share

Recommended Posts

In my opinion,

they did go to the moon, of course they did, it is just too big to keep under wraps for 40 years, there were just too many people involved to fake it.

However, it was more or a propoganda war and media driven thing and the last thing NASA wanted was for the guys to get back and find the camera film was all fogged up or the pictures were not framed properly - the Hassalblad cameras were fixed to the chest of the astronouts and were of fixed focus, all they did was just point and shoot and hope for the best - for this reason NASA may have staged some of the photos for PR purposes, so that they could frame the shots correctly and have them crystal clear in focus etc. so that they could hand them out to the media and get all the correct publicity, and it worked because the PR wa so good that it propelled the space program for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to add. I saw a news report only the other day saying that NASA had lost the film of the exploration of the moon. This was high quality stuff. All that remains is teh grainy pictures that were sent back to earth via satelite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They saw mysterious lights which Astronaghts refer to as critters.

These lights could not be explained and still cannot be explained to this day.

The truth is that alot of strange activity goes on above our atmosphere which scientists cannot provide an answer to.

alot of strange activities go around us. all these people talking about seeing ufo's cant all be fake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats this hangup about mobile phones ? Radio has been around for a long time. Wireless transmitters. Ships were able to talk to each other across hundreds of miles from before WW2 without wires. All the astronauts transmitter had to do is reach the spacecraft and then the spacecraft had transmit back to earth. A spacecraft that could carry whatever size battery it needed for the purpose.

As for the hardware and software ? Enough velocity to escape orbit and enough correction to land. What else is needed ?

Stop being cranks, it doesn't do any of your political beliefs any good either. A crank in one area is far more likely to be a crank in another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use