Jump to content

Sikh Community Will Always Support Hindus


Recommended Posts

Remember guys, the Khalsa does not hate any community or religion. In fact the Khalsa doesn't hate ANYONE for that matter. Our fight is against tyrants only, even if they wear the 5 kakaars outwardly.

Anti Hindu people need to read ''The Gallant Defender'' wherein a HINDU exmagistrate vocally takes the Sikh side in describing the events around 1984. Painting everyone in a community with the same brush is the mark of an ignorant fool.

Exceptions are always there.

this dosnt apply when your father is guru gobind singh ji and when your grandfather gave his life to protect the the same community from extinction that you seem to hate.

Brilliant posts Singho

I think this shabad says it all

pRBwqI ]

prabhaathee ||

Prabhaatee:

Avil Alh nUru aupwieAw kudriq ky sB bMdy ]

aval aleh noor oupaaeiaa kudharath kae sabh ba(n)dhae ||

First, Allah created the Light; then, by His Creative Power, He made all mortal beings.

eyk nUr qy sBu jgu aupijAw kaun Bly ko mMdy ]1]

eaek noor thae sabh jag oupajiaa koun bhalae ko ma(n)dhae ||1||

From the One Light, the entire universe welled up. So who is good, and who is bad? ||1||

logw Brim n BUlhu BweI ]

logaa bharam n bhoolahu bhaaee ||

O people, O Siblings of Destiny, do not wander deluded by doubt.

Kwilku Klk Klk mih Kwilku pUir rihE sRb TWeI ]1] rhwau ]

khaalik khalak khalak mehi khaalik poor rehiou srab t(h)aa(n)ee ||1|| rehaao ||

The Creation is in the Creator, and the Creator is in the Creation, totally pervading and permeating all places. ||1||Pause||

mwtI eyk Anyk BWiq kir swjI swjnhwrY ]

maattee eaek anaek bhaa(n)th kar saajee saajanehaarai ||

The clay is the same, but the Fashioner has fashioned it in various ways.

nw kCu poc mwtI ky BWfy nw kCu poc kuMBwrY ]2]

naa kashh poch maattee kae bhaa(n)ddae naa kashh poch ku(n)bhaarai ||2||

There is nothing wrong with the pot of clay - there is nothing wrong with the Potter. ||2||

sB mih scw eyko soeI iqs kw kIAw sBu kCu hoeI ]

sabh mehi sachaa eaeko soee this kaa keeaa sabh kashh hoee ||

The One True Lord abides in all; by His making, everything is made.

hukmu pCwnY su eyko jwnY bMdw khIAY soeI ]3]

hukam pashhaanai s eaeko jaanai ba(n)dhaa keheeai soee ||3||

Whoever realizes the Hukam of His Command, knows the One Lord. He alone is said to be the Lord's slave. ||3||

Alhu AlKu n jweI liKAw guir guVu dInw mITw ]

alahu alakh n jaaee lakhiaa gur gurr dheenaa meet(h)aa ||

The Lord Allah is Unseen; He cannot be seen. The Guru has blessed me with this sweet molasses.

kih kbIr myrI sMkw nwsI srb inrMjnu fITw ]4]3]

kehi kabeer maeree sa(n)kaa naasee sarab nira(n)jan ddeet(h)aa ||4||3||

Says Kabeer, my anxiety and fear have been taken away; I see the Immaculate Lord pervading everywhere. ||4||3||

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sunsingh said :

Anti Hindu people need to read ''The Gallant Defender'' wherein a HINDU exmagistrate vocally takes the Sikh side in describing the events around 1984. Painting everyone in a community with the same brush is the mark of an ignorant fool.

babbarsher said :

if we started hating them coz they hate us then whats the difference between us and them? its like saying since some whites mistake us for arabs we should mistake all whites for racists....sounds stupid dosnt it?

Mehtab Singh, said:

Remember guys, the Khalsa does not hate any community or religion. In fact the Khalsa doesn't hate ANYONE for that matter. Our fight is against tyrants only, even if they wear the 5 kakaars outwardly.

----------

I agree!

As for Harmandeal, its ignorant idiots like u who give us all a bad name. Can u provide an Evidence fro your outlandish, stupid comments?

Please read what the granh sahib ji has to say about ram chander, it shows respect to him, and you are insulting our gurus by saying such things.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest amar_jkp

its not hate its political awareness.sikh cant be victims of gay ram chander and his clan all the time.

Rama and all Hindu God and Goddess are imaginary characters they never existed. Waris Shah wrote Heer Ranjha does it mean Heer Ranjha existed ?

NO. Same can be said for Balmiki Ramayan . Rama never existed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest amar_jkp

Then why ahd bhagat Trilochan written about Ram Chander in the Granth sahib ji, and also abotu Laxman, Ravan and Hanuman on page 695?

Why have our gurus written about him in the granth sahib?

Its a famous story , whats wrong in writing about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've been unable to read between the lines and grasp the subtext of the article. It's a clear attempt at pitting Sikhs against some nebulous form of Islam, by equating medieval Mughal expansionism with its various contemporary terror-related forms. British-penned propaganda or a general West vs Islam perspective, it's doing exactly what you constantly highlight on this forum about us being "recruited" by outsiders as fodder.  The playful and almost throwaway tone of the article and its vernacular is also cringeworthy. Am I suggesting we leap into bed with Islam and its adherents? No. But I don't like attempts by outsiders trying to mine our painful and blood-soaked history to manipulate us into following whatever current strand of policy they've devised against one of the existential dangers facing them. Equally, intention counts for a lot. If the guy's aim was to flatter Sikhs and shed light on a quaint and once-proud warrior race, then fair enough. But I don't take things like this on face value. There's always a purpose behind it however faint. Your cheap little attempts at psycho-analysing and shaming me into conforming to your worldview isn't working and it never will. EDIT: Having just flicked through the website from which the article originates my suspicions were correct. It's a moderately right-leaning Spectator-esque online zine.
    • No, I just think you constantly over analyse the wrong stuff. This is just some simple bod 'boosted' interpretation of Sikh history from a purely physical perspective (as opposed to spiritual). What it seems to be trying to do is amplify Sikh bravery and independence in a very simplistic manner.  It's not dissimilar to what I've heard Sikh street guys talking just prior to going out to kick off with another group.  I don't think you can read very well, compared to a lot of stuff, at least this piece somewhat underscores a perspective that doesn't co-opt Sikhs to other causes. And if a brit white guy wrote this (below), he'd be being more honest than the vast majority of the rest of his people (even though the guy is obviously ignorant of the modern nature of the Sikh army under Sikh raj with his swords against canons comment). If he was a proper brit he'd be telling us about how grateful our lot were to be subjugated and used and abused by the colonialists: The Sikhs were better fighters than the Moghuls, when the numbers and the guns were anything like equal, and by the time the Brits arrived, they’d carved out their own state in the Punjab. They fought the Brits twice, swords against cannon, and were slaughtered, then flattered, then coopted—the classic Imperial method of dealing with brave but dumb cannon fodder, as in “Our dear Highlanders,” cannon fodder in cute kilts. 
    • So why would you want to keep dragging them back here, then?
    • If it was confirmed that a British white guy wrote that piece, you'd be all over it, castigating it as establishment propaganda designed to get us to fight under the banners of ex-imperial powers for their modern colonial escapades. You're very selective with what you choose to object to: it's not the actual substance of the message that annoys you but the vessel in which the message is delivered, yes?
    • I just think it's a simplified narrative designed to inspire a bit of fearlessness in Sikhs. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing.  There will always be some people who will misinterpret and maybe fly off the handle due to their own personality traits, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't have such accounts.  I tend to see these things as stepping stones or entry points for people to explore the ithihaas/culture in more depth.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use