Jump to content

Soormeh Kill Sacha Sauda Follower


Recommended Posts

Beautiful realization, Papi!

On an aside..

Jo Peh Hamna Paap Karanta, Aahay Ananta, Patit Paavan Naam Kaisay Huntaa?

Killing over opposing beliefs. Where are we going with this mentality. One day we will be proud if our own people go to the extents of 9/11, it seems, over conflicting opinonis and belifs, and that scares the crap out of me.

Or, as I'm sure will be pointed out, perhaps I'm just naive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done guys.

This is a great step. Basically, it is difficult to kill Ram raheem because of his security. However, we should be going for the next best thing which is beating up/killing/maiming his key followers. If you cant hit the jackpot you can always hit the next best thing. They cant guard everyone and everything. Hit the weaker targets.

These fools shouldnt be able to sleep at night. Make it feel unsafe and unpopular to be a follower of dera chootha sauda.

This is war guys. Anything goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm trying to figure out what kind of 'surma' kills a random misguided follower of the Sirsa leader.

It would have been one thing to give a adequate response to the bodyguard that killed a Sikh in Bombay, just picking off somebody who goes to or at sometime went to the dera is stupid and wrong and anti-Sikh and anti-God.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"He was posted as patwari in canal department,"

By the way, there's nothing to say that this case has anything to do with the ongoing Sikh/Sirsa struggle.

All we know that happened is that some patwari (land registration official) was killed. For all we know, this could have something to do with a land dispute that was unfavourably settled or something else completely unrelated.

Since there are plenty of Sirsa followers, not every Sirsa person who is robbed, killed, or has something else happen to him had it happen because he goes to the dera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys love to argue, yet know ZERO FACTS.

Lilly Kumar led mobs to attack Sikhs, and was one of the deras 15 member committee in mansa area. He got what was coming to him.

Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know that.

Were the civil authorities moving against him? (Was this the reason he was going to the courts?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys love to argue, yet know ZERO FACTS.

Lilly Kumar led mobs to attack Sikhs, and was one of the deras 15 member committee in mansa area. He got what was coming to him.

Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know that.

Were the civil authorities moving against him? (Was this the reason he was going to the courts?)

Yes, hindu authorities always move against Sikh killers, which world you living in. Just remember tytler, sajan, kps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know that.

Were the civil authorities moving against him? (Was this the reason he was going to the courts?)

Yes, hindu authorities always move against Sikh killers, which world you living in. Just remember tytler, sajan, kps.

bkand brother, you've provided a viangmei (sarcastic) slap, which I am grateful for, but hopefully someone familiar with the situation can provide the information we're looking for (whether the civil authorities were moving against this man).

We need this information to determine the justifiability of this move in accordance with Sikh ethics as defined by Sri Guru Gobind Singh ji. (It is justifiable to pick up the sword after all means have been exhausted. -- Zafarnama http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Zafarnama)

By a simple corollary, if all other means have not been exhausted, direct action is haram (prohibited).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use