Jump to content

Arguing With A Muslim


Recommended Posts

Basically there is a Muslim guy in my collage and we started talking about each other’s history, and I told him about what the Muslims have done to Sikhs, such as what happened to Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji, Bhai Taru Singh Ji, The Sahibzade and how we gave our heads, and them cutting babies and making the mothers were them.

and he started going "Muslims aren’t allowed to do that..."

and we started ARGUING BADLY!

So now he wants evidence that Muslims have done this. And he goes give dates, and were it is written down and why it happened. and that where I need your help.

SO SANGAT JEE PLEASE HELP, THIS GUY IS GETTING REALLY PROUD AND BIG HEADED! HELP!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

All of the below are from the book 'sicques tigers or thieves' by amandep madra and parmjit singh

there is an eyewitness account by a jesuit priest (Father jerome xavier) of Guru Arjan Dev Ji's shaheedi

Guru Tegh Bahadur Sahib Ji's shaheedi- 'The jats pathans, and sikhs, 1768' by Xavier Wendel- about Guru ji choosing to give his life over converting to Islam

account of Baba Banda Singh Bahadur Ji's shaheedi and the inhumane treatment of the sikh prisoners of war -'Madras Diary and Consultation Book', 1715-1719

ill try and get more later

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All religions are best in their own Faith and Belief. Muslims have been taught right from the Begnning that who so ever is not MUSLIM is Kaafir.

Therefore Muslims are proud of their History and We are proud of Our History.

The way they convince Non Muslim to convert to Muslim. We shud also do the same

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These guys are brainwashed and more significantly dishonest man. Arguing with them is like banging your head against a brick wall. Coz they won't accept no logic. To them quran is the only logic. The best way to shut em up is to question about Muhammad's life and his wives. Him marrying a 4 yr old and indulging in child sex and then also his marriage with Safiyah the 18 yr old jewish girl whose family he murdered and had sex with her the same night. Combine these facts and question him if such a person can truly be a role model for humanity? Go to sites like www.faithfreedom.org and wikiislam. You gotto know enough before you debate. Also question about heaven 72 virigns and stuff and y muhammad had arond 10 wives wheres muslims are allowed 'only' 4 each.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just kindly remind him of the fact that the king of the middle east during the 10th century had all the Qurans burnt, as they went against his ideology of what is halal and what is haram (including forceful conversions). He has the Qurans rewritten to his own accord and had these fakes WIDELY distributed to all muslims. So he may worship the Quran, but its a fake Quran.

...just a little known fact...

72 virigns

originally it was 72 grapes. but over time the two words sounding akin, turned grapes into virgins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

our history wasnt about muslim vs. sikh. it was about sikh opposing tyranny in any form. problem is history is often full of biased accounts written by victors (the tyrants). i doubt he would accept accounts of history written by non-muslims whereas the rulers would obviously write that they were peace-loving.

first sikh shaheed is Guru Arjan Dev Ji Maharaj. Despite being trusted friend of his father, Emporer Jahangir states in his autobiography Tuzak-e-Jahangiri that he made no investigation of any allegations and simply passed the Guru to Murtza Khan for execution under the law of Yasa. Yasa is Turkish word meaning "kill slowly by torture". The law of Yasa was used by Changez Khan known all the world over as the cruelest person. This punishment was later given to Bhai Mani Singh who was hacked inch by inch on November 17, 1737. Bhai Taru Singh, Shahbaj Singh, Subeg Singh and many others suffered the same fate.

Emporer Aurangzeb was first ruler in history to attempt to impose Shariah Laws on non-islamic country & was one of main reasons the mughal raj collapsed. This meant Jizya tax was imposed on non-muslims, music was banned, temples demolished & people forcibly converted to islam which led to ninth Guru's martyrdom.

Put aside Sikhi and say just in his own family if Emporer Aurangzeb is indeed Alamgir & great muslim how can anyone justify according to islam imprisoning his father? having his elder brother beheaded & serving the severed head to his old aged father in a dish? killing another brother? if that is how he treated family how does he think this great ruler treated non-muslims?

http://www.aurangzeb.info/ has historical exhibits depecting the cruelty of his rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Sikh Shaster, I think you got your answer in your own post :

"and he started going "Muslims aren't allowed to do that..." "

Yes indeed Sikhs were killed, tormented and tortued by Muslims. But it was the mughal government that instigated it and was responsible for the persecution of Sikhs. Therefore any person employed by the government or who received benefits from the authorities killed Sikhs. Muslims, Hindus and yes even Sikhs betrayed their own brethren.

No religion rewards the killing of innocent people more so of babies. So I think the religious debates you have at college shouldn't be of my religion is better than yours. Sikhi states there is only one god.

"proud and big headed about what?

proud becasue he thinks he is the most religious and Islam is the only religion. And Big Headed because he thinks that I'm lying and he has won the conversation and that Muslims are the best.

Sikh guru's also had muslim companions, e.g. Bhai Mardana. Mian Mir laid the foundation at Harmandir Sahib.

You should discuss things that unite and bring communities together and not cause friction and hate amongst each other at college.

Also I don't think it is right to post messages which might sound offensive about prophet's of other faiths Babber Khalistani.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ਮਿਲੈ ਅਸੰਤੁ ਮਸਟਿ ਕਰਿ ਰਹੀਐ ॥੧॥

मिलै असंतु मसटि करि रहीऐ ॥१॥

Milai asanṯ masat kar rahī▫ai. ||1||

Meeting with an unsaintly person, just remain silent. ||1||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11904355/Paedophile-policeman-22-sex-14-year-old-girl-jailed-five-years.html
    • Personally I'm not remotely surprised. Let's put things in a wider geo-political perspective. These are my opinions btw, I don't expect people to share them, and as writing them are uncomfortable, I imagine reading them will also be for many. Whatever your feelings about it, the reality is that right now, India (politically and economically) is doing big things that challenge the global, white supremacist dominance (read eurocentrism) that's been dictating things for centuries to all nonwhite people's (and others) detriment.  The indian speeches castigating the hegemony and warmongering by mainly western europeans and americans resonate with many people globally including Africa and some parts of latin America. I've heard this multiple times over the last year from varying sources. So for the first time in centuries, the people who've held a hegemonic stranglehold on global politics and economy and even culture are on a back foot.  Indians are (understandably in context) being seen as heroes for helping finally confront and face this reality and not succumbing to western threats and manipulations. This was a once in a lifetime opportunity and india took it.       Slap bang at a point when this is happening our lot pop up looking as if they want to derail that. And people shouldn't be ignorant of the perception of certain apnay being chaaplooses to goray, which shouldn't be surprising given the unquestioning military support for the white colonial agenda certain apnay gave in recent history.  I've always said that white supremacism/hegemony is something that we have to face up to and confront, regardless of any contentions with delhi.  If timing and tactics are anything to consider, I would have thought letting india get on with challenging western european hegemony and the undeniable growth of neo-nazism in the west would've been in our interests right now, especially as we aren't capable of dealing with it on our own, and with many of our lot having a historical proclivity to subordinate themselves to this for personal gain in any case.  So I'm not remotely shocked a lot of hate is coming our way.    It's like supporting certain people during the 'Indian mutiny' which did us no favours and just led to the plunder of Panjab and after a hundred years of slavery, use and abuse being left to face mass murder and rape and losses of large swathes of land whilst certain people scuttled off into the sunset. 
    • If a time is coming it could be much worse than another war (in which being prepared will be pointless).   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use