Bhagat Singh And The Truth

[Only five]

If hes not a Sikh, then edit your post and take off Singh.

Your just one big comedian for Sikh sangat. Can you say the word extremist.

wow you call me a comedian cause you would rather believe in your fairy tail's

Come on, own up to your extremist ways and take the Singh off. You're so called facts point toward he was not a Sikh, so take off the Singh.

for what reason should singh when it was part of his name

And taking up Sikhi was part of his way of life near the end.

[Only five]

Let me ask you. How long did it take for you to come up with your opinion to try and convince others that Bhagat SINGH is not a Sikh. 2 3 4 hours. And it got canned in to seconds.

[yubacitysingh]

Let me ask you. How long did it take for you to come up with your opinion to try and convince others that Bhagat SINGH is not a Sikh. 2 3 4 hours. And it got canned in to seconds.

considering every historian on india's independence claims he was an athiest communist including his family

the fact the british would of exposed if he had become a sikh again cause it would of benifited them

and the fact he wrote a letter explaining why he was an athiest

and what evidence do you provide for your fairy tale

[Gurdaspuria E12]

want evcidence read the extract fom bhai sahib randhir singh(brahmgyani ) who talks in detail of his convo wid bhagat singh dere.

indian historians have own agendas. essentialy bhagat singh has been hijaked by alot of groups. Hes been kinda of stolen from the sikhs.

[Only five]

want evcidence read the extract fom bhai sahib randhir singh(brahmgyani ) who talks in detail of his convo wid bhagat singh dere.

indian historians have own agendas. essentialy bhagat singh has been hijaked by alot of groups. Hes been kinda of stolen from the sikhs.

Thank you! Finally someone with wisdom presents facts and reality.

[yubacitysingh]

want evcidence read the extract fom bhai sahib randhir singh(brahmgyani ) who talks in detail of his convo wid bhagat singh dere.

indian historians have own agendas. essentialy bhagat singh has been hijaked by alot of groups. Hes been kinda of stolen from the sikhs.

lol bhai sahib randhir makes a claim and you believe it without him proving it just cause he made a claim, once again i believe this man's claim is a lie

because bhagat singh's sister till this day say's bhagat singh died as a communist/freedom fighter

bhagat singh's family claimed this and they were the last once from the outside world to see him day's before his hanging

the british would of exposed bhagat singh fast if he flipped on his beliefs, it was bhagat singh's belief's and conviction passion that inspired others to follow him, don't you think the british would use bhagat singh's change in idealogy to hurt him and his movement rather then protect it

how was bhagat singh's hijaked considering all british historians on british rule on india and india's freedom struggle acknowledge bhagat singh was a communist freedom fighter, all historians acknowledge this, but tell me what agenda do the indian historians have for hiding this

greatest evidence is bhagat singh's letter why i am an athiest, how do you explain that letter

don't tell me the british made up the letter cause tell me why would the british make up a letter why i am an athiest when they were trying to destroy bhagat singh's communist freedom movement, you do know when bhagat singh was fighting the british to overthrow them he was fighting to overthrow them and place a communist government, if you believe the lie and conspiracy that the british wrote that letter tell me why would the british write that letter to add fire to bhagat singh's freedom movmeent, if the british wrote that letter they would be helping bhagat singh's cause, hence why i believe this conspiracy is stupid that the british wrote it

[Only five]

want evcidence read the extract fom bhai sahib randhir singh(brahmgyani ) who talks in detail of his convo wid bhagat singh dere.

indian historians have own agendas. essentialy bhagat singh has been hijaked by alot of groups. Hes been kinda of stolen from the sikhs.

lol bhai sahib randhir makes a claim and you believe it without him proving it just cause he made a claim, once again i believe this man's claim is a lie

You say a Gursikh is a liar and your historians and communist people and British are telling the truth. Do you know which site you are on. This is a Gurmat Site where Gursikhs are respected for their high morals.

And stop calling him Bhagat 'Singh', you can't call him by that name since you don't believe he was a SIkh. Do you get this very critical point. Or is your extremist ways blocking your vision.

because bhagat singh's sister till this day say's bhagat singh died as a communist/freedom fighter

bhagat singh's family claimed this and they were the last once from the outside world to see him day's before his hanging

Was Bhagat Singh sister and family with him in the jail or was Bhai Sahib Randhir Singh ji with him in the jail.

the british would of exposed bhagat singh fast if he flipped on his beliefs, it was bhagat singh's belief's and conviction passion that inspired others to follow him, don't you think the british would use bhagat singh's change in idealogy to hurt him and his movement rather then protect it

how was bhagat singh's hijaked considering all british historians on british rule on india and india's freedom struggle acknowledge bhagat singh was a communist freedom fighter, all historians acknowledge this, but tell me what agenda do the indian historians have for hiding this

greatest evidence is bhagat singh's letter why i am an athiest, how do you explain that letter

Can a letter be written without a pen and paper?

don't tell me the british made up the letter cause tell me why would the british make up a letter why i am an athiest when they were trying to destroy bhagat singh's communist freedom movement, you do know when bhagat singh was fighting the british to overthrow them he was fighting to overthrow them and place a communist government, if you believe the lie and conspiracy that the british wrote that letter tell me why would the british write that letter to add fire to bhagat singh's freedom movmeent, if the british wrote that letter they would be helping bhagat singh's cause, hence why i believe this conspiracy is stupid that the british wrote it

Couldn't someone else make the letter or was rest of the world along with his associates dead by then? To keep the movement going, his associates wrote the letter. IS this not a possibility.

Bhagat Singh and his associates did kill an innocent man, so can't his associates make a false letter and write it off as his. Also the date the letter was written was 5 month before he was hanged. So in those 5 months when he was in jail with Bhai Sahib Randhir SIngh ji, could it be, Bhai Sahib influenced him to be a Sikh. I read the letter and it's not even solid in providing evidence for being an atheist. So are you saying that Bhagat SIngh, to you he's only Bhagat, was not a smart man.

Also what about the fact that in the letter Bhagat Singh refers to his grandfather as orthodox Arya Samajist, but his grandfather was a Sikh. Did Bhagat Singh forget what religion his grandfather was from. It's hard to believe a person like Bhagat Singh who was so focused on religion and atheism would forget what religion his grandfather was from.

Also Bhagat Singh's father was a Sikh, so when he in the letter mentions all the religions and try's to discredit them for their belief, why didn't Bhagat Singh discredit Sikhism. Bhagat Singh grew up in with Sikh parents, so did he again forget to mention the youngest religion and forget to bash on it like the other religions. In the whole letter he only mentions one sentence about Sikhism. Hard to believe a person taht grow up in the religion, would only mention one sentence on it.

But then again what do I know.

[SaintSoldier1]

I am surprised what kind of Sikhs are you who are trying to defame Bhagat Singh him just because someone called Bhai Randhir Singh wrote something in his book . What Randhir Singh wrote is incorrect , unsubstantiated, childish and deceptive. Even a school kid in India wont believe what Randhir Singh wrote.

Firstly as a Sikh why do you need to defame Bhagat Singh for being an atheist or cutting his hair. Bhagat Singh was a Sikh and would always remain a Sikh . He was more of a Sikh than most of you writing this crap online. He cut his hairs for a bigger cause and any Indian fighting against the British would do the same. Maybe you have no understanding and appreciation of Indian freedom fighters as either you have never stayed in India or you have no maturity to understand him…...you belong to Randir Singh Clan.

Do you know General Shabeg Singh who commanded the Indian Army and helped India win the 1971 war with China and also fought with Bhindrarwale . He also cut his hair to serve his country. That didn't make him less Sikh. It was Indira Gandhi's treachery that he was asked to leave the services. The truth is that Cambridge educated Nehru and his legacy (Congress and his whole Gandhi clan) are the biggest curse on the country of India. For those who ahve read the book, Reminiscences of the Nehru Age by Mathai will undersntad that (Google it)

Secondly why do you need Bhagat Singh to believe in God or have kesh for you to be true sikhs. A true Sikh doesn't judge others and try to defame others. Maybe you should look within and see are you really. Are you true sikhs of Guru or some weaklings trying to convince yourself to be ones. True Sikhs are ones who can give their life for a good cause in heart beat. I am sure none of you will qualify in that case. Bhagat Singh was one of those who was willing to give his life in heartbeat.

Stop using Bhagat Singh's writings to defame him. If he was an atheist and didn't believe in God that was his right to do so. He is the most courageous freedom fighters that India ever produced. He did a great service for his country and I am proud that he was a Indian and was born a Sikh. Read the history my friends. In that way I can point fingers at many who contributed toward the Sikh cause.

He was braver, nobler and wiser than English educated morons like Gandhi, Nehru, Jinnah who screwed the Indian nation for their own political and egoistical ends. Like former supreme Court of India judge says that Bhagat Singh was real freedom fighter, not like "cunning rascal" Gandhi

http://www.dailyo.in/politics/bhagat-singh-mahatma-gandhi-sukhdev-rajguru-freedom-struggle-british/story/1/2704.html

If you are a true sikh of a guru please stop this discussion on Bhagat Singh and focus on developing your own inner self.

[JSINGHANANDPUR]

Wjkk Wjkf

I have limited knowledge about him but from what ive read and heard yeah he was an atheist. Maafi for saying this Mehtab Veerjeo but there is a difference between being in a 'Sikhi saroop' and being a sikh. Saroop without backup of Gurmat is nothing but a bhekh, a disguise.

Why I am an atheist - Bhagat Singh

I agrre PJ Singh . First he was born in Arya Samaji Family , even in his letters to family members he normally starts with om on the heading , saying namaste to mfamily members to conclude the letter . further during college days was drawn to Atheism ,and socialist ideology . i cannot understand why we are so hell bent on proving him Sikh . He was impressed by Guru Sahibaan as a norma Punjabi would , nothing less nothing more . What this present arguement will gain - nothing . I Repeat NOTHING . better let his soul be in rest wherever it is , and lts move further in our own ideology