Jump to content

Www.Manglacharan.Com


sikhreality
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'd never respect Santa he never backed sant ji,sant ji says in his video, Santa also said he'd get sant ji out of harmandar sahib in 3hrs then he sided with indira he has gne down in history as a gaddar and will always be one

a benti from Buddah Dal UK, at the next Uk Buddah Dal program we invite you to come their and express your views on 96 crori Baba Santa Singh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd never respect Santa he never backed sant ji,sant ji says in his video, Santa also said he'd get sant ji out of harmandar sahib in 3hrs then he sided with indira he has gne down in history as a gaddar and will always be one

You do not respect Sant ji also.Neither dal khalsa and other congress agent organizations respect him.They respect only Ragi Darshan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To everyone on SIkh Sikh sangat the way in which to destroy a culture explained :-

In order to change the structure and power of a group to win favour and to bring that group into your control a number of steps must be undertaken

Depending on the group size and the pride of a group the only way to change it is with in as established groups resent any outsider stepping in and trying to change them (and damn right to) as a group always assumes it is correct in its philosophy

So the action that hindus or anybody who wants to change that group takes is it finds bright spots with in the group. The bright spots are literally people with in that group that hold qualities that the regime or hindu nation or muslim nation wants to change so in the case of sikhs it would be sikhs that doubt the authenticity of the Adi Granth or Guru Granth Sahib and can be changed easily through subtle manipulation through others already established in that group (which in our case would be the bhai spreading sarbloh granth etc)

At first only two or three members of the group that they want to change have to agree (our group in this case sikh sangat) once a group rapport is established (everyone is cool with it) then others in the group (sikh sangat akj etc) accept that the concept introduced (sarbloh) is indeed on par with their current thinking the group then spreads this like wildfire throughout the group the enemy or hindus in our case leave the group which dissolves into the new structure from within and because the new manipulated group think matches the enemies in small degrees they keep on making these small changes until their thining is aligned and merged into the bigger group (hindus)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so in the case of sikhs it would be sikhs that doubt the authenticity of the Adi Granth or Guru Granth Sahib and can be changed easily through subtle manipulation through others already established in that group (which in our case would be the bhai spreading sarbloh granth etc)

Those who believe in sikh scriptures such as Dasam Granth and sarbaloh Granth have highest regards for sri guru Granth sahib ji.All of those jathebandis consider Sri Guru Granth sahib ji as their Guru eternal.They have made maximum sacrifices for panth. Their credentials are strong.Examples of these jathebanids are Damdami tksal and singhs of akj who sacrificed their lives for sikh panth whenever there was a call.

On the other hand those who spread such rumours are themselves no. 1 denigrators of Sikh panth.They are the ones who have lifted their finger on authenticity of

Sri Guru Granth sahib ji. One of the ring leaders of this gang is kala afghana follower Joginder Spokesman.They are the ones who are propagating against SGGS ji.

Here is what this ring leader of heretic lobby writes about SGGS ji

The link for spokeman's ( March 16,2010)balsphemic editorial questioning authenticity of Guru Granth sahib ji is given

below

http://rozanaspokesm...om/fullpage.asp ... 16&pview=6

English translation for the same is given below

After guru gobind singh ji left for his heavenly abode, those people, who were desperate to label Babeh Nanak's sikhi as just another offshoot of brahmanical religion, suddenly became active. For centuries, these individuals had been fanatically determined to finish off any religion from this world that is not a part of Brahmanic ideology. Buddhism issued a challenge to this ideology, and everyone is aware of what these people did to that religion. These individuals also wanted to hurry to make Sikh religion a part of Brahmanic ideology so that no bigger trouble surface later. In this hurry, they got 'Bachittar Natak' written which is full of mistakes and lies and propagated that it is the autobiography of Guru Gobind Singh, written by himself. In that hurry, they also got few compositions from hindu granths from here-and-there and said that this all is the 'treasure' Guruji has left for us. The one and only purpose of these compositions was to make sikhi a part of Brahmanic ideology.

Because the sikhs themselves were busy fighting wars, it became even more easy to push this conspiracy further and nirmalas, udhasis took this job in their hands. Not only books like 'Gurbilas Patshahi 6' and 'Dasam Granth', but almost all historical resources have been written by the nirmalas. The Srichandis (these people) these nirmalas and udhasis destroyed or burnt Babeh Nanak's handwritten 'Pothi Saihb' and later wrote that this 'Pothi' was destroyed during wars. The 'Cholaa' of Babeh Nanak didnt get destroyed, the wooden sandles remained safe, every writing and memorials of all the other gurus and 35 bhagats remained safe, so was it that the wars had to only destroy the handwritten 'Bani' of Babeh Nanak?

It is absolutely certain that these people made many changes to Guru Granth Sahib and started the bad trend of burning the older Birs [saroops] (so that every piece of evidence) could be destroyed, and started propagating the idea that 'to do Sanskaar of old Birs' is a part of religious duty. Only dead bodies are burnt. Do the old Birs symbolise the books of dead knowledge? Burning of knowledge can never be called an act of any religion. These people, in order to hide their ill-deeds, also started declaring that no changes can be made to any word, characters, or Matra of the bani of Guru Granth Sahib. To cover up their tracks, these very people, who had themselves made big changes, played this card to finalise their changes. There are many other religions. They also have their respected granths. No other religion made 'Sanksaar' or 'Changes of words, characters and Maatras' a sin. Why? Why didnt any Guru impose this kind of ban? Why did it occur to only nirmalas and udhaasis? There is a need to think, analyse and research this. Many proofs are surfacing that present evidence of thebut whenever anyone starts taking steps towards seeking the truth, the nirmalas and their agents start crying foul and say, "Look, he is raising objections against guru granth sahib. Those backstabbing of Babeh Nanak by nirmalas and udhaasis who screamed and shouted would never want the truth to surface and their plans explosed. We will write more on this later, for now however we want to give you the hint and pointer that right from the beginning, these srichandis have tried to backstab the philosophy of babeh nanak and have made a fool of the sikhs.

Another bloody attempt at backstabbing has increased when panth accepted 'nankshahi calender' of 2003 has been restamped with 'we are hindus' dates on new calender. What was the need to make changes when this calender was accepted by the entire panth? A handful of nirmalas and their 'Cholaa and round dastaar wearing' sants started crying that how come their highly successful job of layering Brahmanic skin on sikh religion for the past 300 years has been brought to a abrupt halt with 'nanakwadi' approach. For the past 300 years, their sole purpose had been to try to keep the sikh philosophy, sikh gurdwaras, sikh maryadas, sikh history and gurbani attached to brahmanic ideology in one form or the other. In the 2003 'nanakshahi calender' they could see complete seperation of the sikh philosophy and history from the brahmanic ideology. This attempt was to kill all the attempts of the srichandis. Srichandis became worried to no end.

Consider this good fortune of the srichandis that the sikh politicians sitting on the seat of shromani committee meaning control of gurdwara golaks were hard to get votes of sabat soorat sikhs. The srichandis sants promised the votes of the lazy idlers sitting at their deras (the total of which is in lakhs) and as such have been successful at stabbing babeh nanak one more time with the help of these 'akali leaders'. On the pretext of Sangrands and Massiyas, the nanakshahi calender has been attached to bikrami calender. They are scared that time is soon going to change its tide and if the wound is not inflicted on time, maybe new leader will not agree to do this job. Just as they succeded in propagating 'dasam granth' and 'gurbilas' in haste, they have now converted 'nanakshahi calender' into 'dual-philosophy' aka two-faced calender. The target is still the same that was 300 years ago - to not let the unique character of sikhi surface and to keep sikhi nailed to the floor with the rope of Brahmanic ideology. Like we said above, times have changed and this revolution of 21st century will soon bring an end to both of them.whether

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not believe for one moment that Guru Gobind Singh Ji would ask us to do Havan and adorn Tilak this is RSS propaganda it will not work

I am not sure but the history of the RSS does not seem to go back as far as that of the Sri Sarbloh Granth or other granths such as the Bansavlinama regarding the Khalsa and Havans?

Tilaks? Was a tilak not applied when the gaddi was passed from one Guru to another? Someone shoudl have told the Gurus and Baba Buddha Ji that they were complying with RSS traditions!

Singh good website. Look foreward to seeing more stuff on there soon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Gurus must have been RSS agents because they did tilak ph34r.gif

Seriously though dismissing something based on one line that you find hard to comprehend is stupid. They are great Sikh saints and scholars out there who i am sure would answer our questions if we ask them.

I remember some Singhs recorded questions and answers with Sant Jagjit Singh Harkhowale. I think more of these type of things need to be done on issues or pangtis we may find controversial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use