Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
japjeev singh

Was Bhagat Singh An Atheist?

Recommended Posts

communism does not work

only way in india it would of worked is if state owned all assets for generation giving everyone in india an equal shot at education and prosperity and then slowly move towards a free market system and give more and more private ownership to people

cause sadly after Britain left the people who were in the middle class and upper class were the once loyal to the british and ruled india for the british n they continued to exploit india but now kept the british cut when it came to the money

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

simply...yes He was atheist but not pagan. another one was Khuswant singh (great indian poet ).

BUT............wait........

They always loved the way as Gurus told us ...They always loved What gurus have given us...

They always tried to maintain Gurus look....Sikh sardar..........

(sikhi is not forced on someone,its all about sharda..but If someone sikh can't follow the Gurbani or paadth,,atleast he should maintain the roop of Gurus.......but even if he can't handle it as well,,Then he/she should live according to manmat..

But later, In order to get any credit of sikhism in hi/her life,, They should not be Hypocrites...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

simply...yes He was atheist but not pagan. another one was Khuswant singh (great indian poet ).

BUT............wait........

They always loved the way as Gurus told us ...They always loved What gurus have given us...

They always tried to maintain Gurus look....Sikh sardar..........

(sikhi is not forced on someone,its all about sharda..but If someone sikh can't follow the Gurbani or paadth,,atleast he should maintain the roop of Gurus.......but even if he can't handle it as well,,Then he/she should live according to manmat..

But later, In order to get any credit of sikhism in hi/her life,, They should not be Hypocrites...

no , please read jail chittiyan bhai randhir singh

bhagat singh was a normal person , even though he was born in sikh house hold.

he was a complete athiest

and he purposely cut his hair to let indian media to show him as hindu to obtain fame ,

its all in jail chittiyan please read

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no , please read jail chittiyan bhai randhir singh

bhagat singh was a normal person , even though he was born in sikh house hold.

he was a complete athiest

and he purposely cut his hair to let indian media to show him as hindu to obtain fame ,

its all in jail chittiyan please read

Well said, brother.

Edited by JSinghnz
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bhagat singh did not cut his hair for fame or to win over the hindus

he cut his hair cause he no longer believed in god along with his friends

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no , please read jail chittiyan bhai randhir singh

bhagat singh was a normal person , even though he was born in sikh house hold.

he was a complete athiest

and he purposely cut his hair to let indian media to show him as hindu to obtain fame ,

its all in jail chittiyan please read

I m not saying he was not atheist .. but being mona he was loved by hindus more...but he realized it later. but what did he do right or wrong I don't know but

at last he realized his faults and started keeping his kesh again in jail... and we know it was a good thing...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bhagat singh did not cut his hair for fame or to win over the hindus

he cut his hair cause he no longer believed in god along with his friends

He cut his hair because british police came to know that someone sikh guy had killed their police officer and it was bhagat singh and In order to escape and in order to protect other freedom fighters who were with him..He decided to lose his sikh look..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We are equal in the eyes of God because we are beneath him. It is looking at ants from our eyes. The problem with people is that they think that leadership is a privilege. It is not, it is a responsibility.  As the head of the family you may have the authority but that always comes with accountability. They go hand in hand. In families there is a pecking order, the children first, the women next and then the men. Men are the sacrificial gender, why in cases of emergency do they say "women and children first". A woman will sacrifice her life for her children but never for her husband. A man will sacrifice for both. Women who take leadership from her husband do it because they are forced into it or because the man is not up to it and the woman becomes resentful of her husband. 
    • I don’t see how you see this practice as a part of our ancestral history.  What I chose to do independently outside of Sikhi cannot be associated with Sikhi practices. Similar as to how dietary influence is largely down to the landscape and culture of the region you belong to.  The same is for narcotics which are largely taken due to cultural influence and availability to the region.  Just because I eat potato chips in England this does not mean my future generations should adopt this, and somehow associate this with my religious identity.  Your cultural practices can be altered, discarded and chosen but your religious practices can never change,  whether that be in the 18th Century or the 21st.   If you reword this with ‘medicinal, recreational drug use in the region of Punjab in the 17th-18th Century’, I would have no problem with this observation.  But as soon as someone quotes ‘Puratan Sikhs and use of Marijuana’, I am not comfortable with this!
    • Veer ji can u please post pankitis from gursobha and prem sumarag about sukha?
    • Unless you're going to fight enemies of panth and need help of sukha , I don't see any excuse why I should exempt you from similar judgement as of any regular drug addict. People have for long perverted religion for their goals . Nothing new here. Why not get high on naam instead 
    • The whole point about rehit-namas and the differences between them is a whole discussion in itself, but there is evidence in Bhangu's Panth Prakash, Sainapati's Gursobha, Prem Sumarag Granth.  There is also notice of this in the earliest european sources from the late 1700s.  No one is telling anyone to do these things, but to whitewash your own people's history is weak.  As alluded to previously, the people who did partake aren't likely to have done so for what we call 'recreational reasons' today. It may as well have been medical reasons? Given how sukha da tehl is being increasingly investigated by modern science along this very line, it isn't implausible. It may well have been a carry over from pre-existing Ayurvedic practice? Can't you people have a grown up discussion about this? 
×

Important Information

Terms of Use