Jump to content

How The World Was Created


Recommended Posts

Waheguru - Excellent Katha from Maskeen Jee.

Although I don't agree that science is any where to Waheguru/Akal Purakh/Creator even today as claimed by some Communists as shown in the Video. The mystery is always "NEW to SCIENCE" as the text in Japji Sahib goes "Kiv Kar Aakha Kiv Salaahi Kiv Varni Kiv Jaana, Nanak Aakhan Sab ko aakhe, ik du ik syana". Sorry for the English intrepretation if there are mistakes. SCIENCE has probably reached the Big Bang concept, but there is miles to go from there ...

Bhuk Chuk maaf ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any mention in Sikhi about where (or how) Waheguru originated from?

Isn't it 'Sehbang' in Mool Mantar, just before Gurparsaad?

If, I read it right, Waheguru Ji is 'a-kaal', without - time/death. And therefore, infinate, and forever, in both directions of time. An entity can only originate from something if that entity did not exist at some point, and something existed before the entity. Well, we all know Waheguru has always been, and nothing has existed before Waheguru, in order to create Waheguru, or which Waheguru could originate from.

If I have got it wrong, apologies!:waheguru:

Sorry - I was typing my reply as Singh 559 was typing his, I wasn't ignoring or repeating his post!

By the way Kaljugi - have you seen what I've typed in the GUPT section?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spoke to a couple of school kids (in UK) and in RE the creation on the World is only taught from Jewish, Christian, Islamic, Hindu & Buddhist perspective. When the kids asked why wasn't the creation of the world taught from a Sikh perspective and the teacher told them that Sikhism & Hinduism have the same view of creation. Is this true? If not, then whats the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spoke to a couple of school kids (in UK) and in RE the creation on the World is only taught from Jewish, Christian, Islamic, Hindu & Buddhist perspective. When the kids asked why wasn't the creation of the world taught from a Sikh perspective and the teacher told them that Sikhism & Hinduism have the same view of creation. Is this true? If not, then whats the difference?

So we believe in that whole 'churning of the ocean by Vishnu (is it)?'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use